Firefox now supports JPEG-XL out of the box. When will 4chan start supporting it?
>>108436811What does decode performance look like now? Decode performance was the reason Google canned it as far as I know.
>>108436811What makes you think Firefox is a metric?
>>108436811> Firefox now supports JPEG-XL out of the box.I don't think it does.First of all, https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/notes/ currently redirects to https://www.firefox.com/en-US/firefox/148.0.2/releasenotes/ and my Firefox 148.0.2 does not offer an upgrade and https://whattrainisitnow.com/release/?version=beta says that the release date for Firefox 149 is “March 24, 2026”.Additionally, the bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016688 does not seem fixed and thus JPEG XL is not supported in Beta and Release builds of Firefox.Finally, 4chan should support image formats in order of their appearance, and thus WebP support and AVIF support should precede any support for JPEG XL.I also don't really believe that 4chan's image processing engine has any support for JPEG XL implemented already and just waiting to be enabled.
>>108436811>using a royalty free, no patents formatcool it with the antisemitism
>>108437420Not exactly, I've heard microsoft owns the patents to jpeg-xl. So jpeg-xl could start charging for royalty payments.
>>108436811>title says thing is available via an external system component>/g/eet: Firefox now supports thing out of the boxmost literate /g/eet(to use r*dditards favo(|u)rite expression)
>>108437363>Finally, 4chan should support image formats in order of their appearance, and thus WebP support and AVIF support should precede any support for JPEG XL.Is this nigger serious?
>When will 4chan start supporting it?Never. Duh. Where's it implied that 4chan should support standard image formats?
Firefox suffers from memory leaks making it unusable.
>>108437926see >>108436851It's the same reason you don't see AV1 replacing H264 everywhere.>inb4 "fuck le poorfags!"Okay well that's money lost for businesses and they care about money not le latest kool hipster tech.
>>108436851>>108437363Reminder these are some of Daiz's bots.Daiz is behind ALL WebPiss and Tel AVIF shill posts. https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/108373308/#108381241https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/108373308/#108381299https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/108373308/#108381312
>>108438846>Tel AVIFkek didn't know that one
>>108438846I remember this guy, never understood why he shilled avif so hard
>>108436851It's an entirely different decoder now. Old numbers are moot. Admit that JXL won.>>108438846fixLIVES had a consistently idiosyncratic posting style before the tripname even appeared. I am convinced that it's a separate person.
>>108436811.gif suffices for 4chan.
>>108436811Why not bmp instead over jpeg xl?
> Tel AvifYour words may sound antisemitic at the first glance, but we both know that you are an undercover philosemite whose wish is to give all the credit for AVIF to the Jewish race and then also transfer the ownership.Typical falseflagging.
>>108436811It would make 4chan a better site and the servers would consume less space so the jannies don't want it>>108436851Even in my ancient Android phone can decode jpeg-xl as fast as the rest of the formats on Chrome and Fossify Gallery wtf are you talking about?>>108437518JXL is FOSS, Microsoft doesn't own shit. Again, what the fuck are you talking about?
>>108436811>4chan>modern technology
>>108436865>Use case for breakfast?
>>108438732Nobody gives a shit about avif or webp
>>108436865use case for real money?
>>108436851webp is the bestjxl and trannif clearly lose color depth
