>>108446084
okay have fun dropping $800 on a second one in 6 months when it gets burn-in, and another $800 6 months after that, forever and ever

>>108446116
It's not forever. Just until microLEDs come down to a reasonable price under $100k.

>>108446122

I've seen a bunch of 60" MicroLED HDTVS for like $800 already.

>>108446116
more like 400$ and it has 3 year burn in warranty
But I am not sure if I will keep it yet anyways, it has to convince me of its worthyness, otherwise its going back

>>108446132
Anon, I think you don't know the difference between microLED and miniLED and/or need to take your meds.

>>108446122
i don't think this will be a reality anytime soon. the more realistic scenarios that OLED will come down in price enough that we will get used to replacing them every 2 years for 200 bucks or something
the manufacturers probably love the fact that OLEDs are basically disposable, it's like built in obsolescence, keeps you spending money

I have high hopes
>dead pixel?
thats a return
>ELMB not satisfactory?
thats a return
color unsatisfactory?
thats a return
>HDR not as expected?
yep thats a return

>>108446116
>6 months
That's what the warranty is for. If you buy an OLED without a nice long burn in warranty, you were dropped on your head too many times.
Mine has a 3 year warranty, but I'm still going to be annoyed if I have to replace it in year 4, we'll see how it goes though.

>>108446132
You are an idiot.

>>108446619
It highly depends how bright you are running it.
If you are running it SDR at 200-300 nits you well never burn it in
if you are running it maxxed out burn in and panel wear is likely
The candle that burns brightest burns out first, this is literal with monitors

>>108446681
Sure, and I don't run mine on full brightness for that very reason. I'd still say it's wise to avoid monitors without a good burn in warranty.

>>108446692
its 3 years on the one I ordered, but idk if I will even keep it yet
gonna get it tommorow and see
I am coming from CRT, so the bar is high
if the tech isnt ready yet ill just keep on using crt

>>108446084
burn-inlets be seething

>>108446084
>1440p
lol

>>108446116
1440p OLEDs cost nothing anymore

>>108446692
It's impossible to use one at full brightness for desktop use, my eyes water from just 5 minutes of usage.

>>108446084
>anything below 4k in 2026
NGMI

File: 1774135247933846.jpg (181 KB, 1080x990)

181 KB JPG

>>108446084
lol you can afford an OLED screen

>>108448872
do you ever go outside? do you ever use your computer at day. anything below 1000nits is unusable at a sunny day.

>>108450343
holy esl

>>108450367
no argument

>>108450343
I don't use my computer outside on a sunny day, no.

>>108450382
do you live in a basement

>>108450419
Yes.

File: 20260325_120831.jpg (586 KB, 4000x3000)

586 KB JPG

Deliverypajeets destroyed it RIP
Im gonna order another one of the same kind and hope it FUCKING ARRIVES KILL ALL NIGGERS
TOTAL NIGGER EXTERMINATION FUCK DELIVERYJEETS FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU
what a waste of my time.
it also gave me a pretty bad zap my hand hurts might go to doctor
I hate jeets

>>108446084
get a decent 4k instead, plenty of media in 4k

>>108446681
300 nits is crazy dim. I run my display at 480 nits and it's still not bright enough in the middle of the day.

>>108450623
I run my crts at 60 nits measured and its fine for me even in the day

>>108450623
what the fuck are you measuring with?

>>108450629
this

>>108450580
lmao

File: its-alll-so-tiresome-tired.mp4 (188 KB, 534x338)

188 KB MP4

>>108450723

>>108450719
display is advertised at ~500nits when configured for max brightness. I wrote 480 because of the error margin specified by the manufacturer

File: LG G5.jpg (338 KB, 1600x1062)

338 KB JPG

>>108446084
Bought this one couple of months ago, it's pretty cool

>>108450862
Whish they made the G5 in 42 inches like the C5. Would make for a great monitor.

>>108450900
I use it as a monitor, i had 42" before it, and honestly it's not a big of a difference

>>108450911
4k at 42 is absolute minimum PPI I'm willing to endure

>>108450580
Pretty sad, what monitor is it tho?

>>108450930
27" asus WOLED 1440p
pretty nice glossy coat
Just returned it, but now it wont let me order another one, seems my card thinks my behaviour is suspicious
im not home on the weekend anyways, ill try ordering again tommorow maybe whatever is locked will clear up, if not ill have to go to the bank I guess
I swear if the next one also comes cracked...
It is a bit of a shame even if the next one is good that glorious feeling of new monitor is lost on me now.
oh well let me forget about this tragedy

File: 1774072854742703.jpg (42 KB, 1024x853)

42 KB JPG

>>108450580
>>108450132
Gottem!

>>108446116
>6 months
Retarded cope. It's a good 3-4 years now, 5 if you're not retarded.
>b-b-but you have to s-spend money
So what? Dumb 20yo poorfaggot. Your vision is worth far more than the price of a monitor. Backlights fucking kill you. Enjoy your fuzzy central vision in your 40s because you were too cheap to buy hardware that's easy on your body. Bet you sit down all day in a shitty chair, too.

>>108446084
goated with the sauce

>>108446084
>WOLED
Wowzers

>>108446084
should've went with 4k

>>108446084
>he fell for the meme
Enjoy taping all your windows shut so you can properly enjoy your True Black in total darkness

File: makise_kurisu_and_okabe_r(...).png (679 KB, 1007x743)

679 KB PNG

>>108454687
they are allready taped shut for my crts

>>108454687
Lmao you think true blacks is the reason to get a OLED?

File: 1760473340181.jpg (2 KB, 250x213)

2 KB JPG

>>108455492
I love my QD-OLED with its niggerish blacks.
miniLEDs can display brighter HDR.

>>108456014
>QD-OLED
>black
lol

File: 20240326_182813.jpg (2.12 MB, 3984x2988)

2.12 MB JPG

>>108456014
>QD-OLED
no one was talking about that matte garbage though

File: 1774309963021779.png (372 KB, 640x738)

372 KB PNG

I am gonna order as many panels as it takes.
Either Asus will run out of monitors or they will learn to ship it safely

File: 1757332378377.png (577 KB, 923x958)

577 KB PNG

>>108456062
There are QD-OLED displays with glossy panel finishes...

>>108456045
"Muh raised/purple blacks" isn't an issue in realistic display setups, and I'm not talking about pitch black rooms.
I was going to return the QD-OLED if it was an actual concern, that's what return policies are for.

>>108456436
>There are QD-OLED displays with glossy panel finishes...
Its semi matte trash, literally all of them.
afaik only WOLED comes in truly glossy
Its a really nice coating
>purple blacks
is actually kinda gay
Glossy WOLEDs are actually black not pink
The new coating is very good
The coating on WOLED is superior, is the QD Panel enough to make up the difference?

>>108456482
>Glossy WOLEDs are actually black not pink
WOLED is the panel with black crush issues and dirty screen effects.
QD-OLED blacks are fine in proper viewing setups, They're competitive for a reason.
I bought the QD-OLED first and picked out a WOLED alternative if the raised blacks were a real issue.
I didn't have to return it after all.

You keep blabbing about shit you never tested, while I enjoy playing Bloodborne during Return to Yharnam.

>>108456525
>WOLED is the panel with black crush issues and dirty screen effects.
Ironic saying "You keep blabbing about shit you never tested", kek.

>>108456436
>>108456525
qd-oled sucks because of pixel placement not because of the shitty blacks

File: 1771195452731412.png (62 KB, 365x332)

62 KB PNG

>>108456525
What panel do you have?
I bet its semi matte
>black crush
little known fact these days but level 1-16 are actually supposed to be crushed to 0
Muh black detail is why we have all those gay movies grey blacks which really should be black even if "detail gets lost"
>Bloodborne during Return to Yharnam.
Im playing Halo Reach on my CRT rn
I am looking forward to getting my WOLED, should be nice
well see about dirty screen effect or washed out colors, if it doesnt perform how I expect ill return it obviously

>>108456552
>little known fact these days but level 1-16 are actually supposed to be crushed to 0
Are you retarded by any chance?

>Muh black detail is why we have all those gay movies grey blacks which really should be black even if "detail gets lost"
That's a configuration issue.

>>108456540
There is no irony. I own both WOLED & QD-OLED displays, I know what I'm talking about.
WOLEDs get brighter, that's it.

>>108456552
>little known fact these days but level 1-16 are actually supposed to be crushed to 0
Lol what? Not for RGB

>>108456566
Proof

>>108456574
What does proof help here? Yeah not all WOLEDs have gray uniformity issues.

File: 1746357887663.png (846 KB, 1120x374)

846 KB PNG

>>108456546
>pixel placement
Don't act like WOLEDs have perfect subpixel layouts.

File: 1769703067681190.png (872 KB, 941x529)

872 KB PNG

>>108456579
>Don't act like WOLEDs have perfect subpixel layouts.
At least they have vertical subpixels. All you need to fix text rendering is rearrange the order.

File: 1772213287118.png (470 KB, 1075x1398)

470 KB PNG

>>108456599
That still has shitty subpixel layout. Those whites are part of the WOLED's core issue, colors are washed out at high brightness.
There's a reason why both LG & Samsung Display announced true RGB subpixel OLED panels this CES.

>>108456621
>There's a reason why both LG & Samsung Display announced true RGB subpixel OLED panels this CES.
Yeah, which are better than both QD-OLED and WOLED. But right now we don't have them yet.

>>108456563
>>108456568
it is how you are supposed to calibrate a CRT.
Maybe it doesnt apply to flatscreens since you dont need to calibrate bias on them generally
if you setup a crt to not crush blacks it will be very washed out
>>108456621
Every LG panel I have seen irl was fantastic and I dont really plan on running a gazillion nits anyways outside of some HDR games

>>108456638
>it is how you are supposed to calibrate a CRT.
Nope.

>>108456638
>if you setup a crt to not crush blacks it will be very washed out
That's because your CRTs are worn out garbage and you never interacted with CRTs when they were new.
I have new old stock CRTs to this day and you're wrong.

>>108456638
Whichever OLED panel you choose, buy one at a discount.
There's 0 reason to be paying full price for any of these older panels.

>>108456552
>Im playing Halo Reach on my CRT rn
this you? >>108456324

for me it's a 60'' projection television from 1997

File: 20260313_222525.jpg (637 KB, 3000x4000)

637 KB JPG

>>108456650
i have alot of high end tubes
you either use LUTs
or you wreck your black level
you cant OLED blacks out of a CRT without black crush unless you use LUTs
>I have NOS
High end monitor NOS?
Somehow I doubt it
Besides NOS doesnt mean shit, capacitors drif either way
NOS means shit realistically
I have NIB CRTs too, altough no 21" ones
>>108456658
440 euro

File: IMG_20260301_132928.jpg (451 KB, 4096x3072)

451 KB JPG

>>108456644
I remember reading it in a service manual sometime, but maybe i misremembered
crts are beautifull

NOT 4K LULE

>>108456786
OP is going to disappointed

File: 3 year old OLED ghosting.jpg (873 KB, 4000x3000)

873 KB JPG

>>108446084
this is my 3 year old LG C2 OLED showing a pure red image
I use a tiling window manager and you can see a ghost line running down the center as well as icons in the top middle and top left
I do use HDR and have fallen asleep with it on while at high brightness
it is not noticeable during normal use however

>>108456786
>>108456799
no game can run in 4k anyways pretty much...
is it really worth it?
And the 4k WOLED are weird stuff like 4k 165hz and 1080p 360hz since they dont have enough bandwith

>>108456870
>no game can run in 4k anyways pretty much...
Most older shit runs fine at 4k 100+ FPS on my 4080S.
Most newer shit has DLSS and DLSS looks much better with 4k, the resolution it scales up from is higher. Specially with the new presets.

>>108456870
What's weird about 165Hz? Imo it's enough.

>>108456885
>>108456882
For 200 euro more the 4k panel with the same coating seems appealing, but it completely lacks strobing meaning piss poor motion
idk if its worth the upcharge...
im gonna test the 1440p panel first

>>108456911
You're not going to use BFI anyways, it sucks ass. Plus VRR doesn't work on those with BFI either.

>>108446084
That's neat anon. I still use a 16*10 LCD display that I've used for at least a decade now.

>>108456870
These 4K OLED monitors with 1080p dual mode aren't using perfect integer scaling btw, its got some janky blur filter.

>>108456932
1440p 240hz seems better then

>>108446084
Make sure you can permanently turn off CPC in the monitor settings
It's a forced software vignetting effect, LG has started to increasingly grief the picture quality since 2022 if you exclude the 100% window max brightness improvements
Else get QD-OLED, it has better bt.2020 hdr coverage and better white balance(LG's antireflection coating griefs the white balance, on tv it makes whites look pink/green)
>>108446116
Lies, my C1 had the edge oxidation issues because of the shitty indian factory before any burn in and i mistreated it except not blasting 100% brightness all the time

>>108446084
You’re a bit late. We’re only a couple years away from microLED or whatever the new tech is called. Should had bought OLED in 2022 like me.

>>108456942
Yes, 1440p27inch is the sweet spot for QD-OLED because of vertical bar dithering
Higher pixel density makes low res non pixelart games miserable to play and it makes qd oled dithering more visible
Ideal is 48inch 4k and 1440p 32inch, if its too big just put it farther away

>>108456916
BFI is good, but it is extremely niche. You need 240hz plus a ton of brightness for it to be good.
Which restricts its utility to higher end IPS panels, which have other issues.

>>108457131
microLED is still far far away

>>108457125
It advertises even brightness, so probably no CPC
Asus is ungriefing LG panels, no matte coating BFI etc
>>108457131
eh
glossy OLED monitors are available for like a year only
in 2022 id have to get a massive TV

>>108457154
I got a TV and didn’t regret it. I dunno if I can go back to 21/27 monitors. 34 is the bare minimum now.
>>108457151
2030 is just around the corner.

>>108457136
48 4k is less than 100 ppi. 42’ goes up to 105 and it is already too low imo. We get noticeable results all the way up to 300ppi. 8k would be really nice at that resolution, but we’re nowhere near being able to run that. Maybe we never will.

>>108446084
More like SWOLED

>>108457226
4k 42" is basically same as 1440p 27"

>>108457226
Low dpi high res has use cases where its massively better, can display more code and use higher FOV in games without losing ability to see far away things
DPI scaling only works with vector art, pixel art will be upscaled which will always be uglier than displaying it at native resolution(even integer scaling is worse than 1:1 for non pixel art)
It's a tradeoff.

>>108457154
This doesn't mean much, you need to verify if the OSD settings explicitly mention CPC and let you disable it, else you can test by displaying a dark grey fullscreen image, if you see a shitty vignetting filter that changes in a breathing pattern appear as if it was straight from unreal engine 5 then congratulations the panel has WOLED CPC toggled on and to the trash it goes if it can't be turned off
I don't understand why redditards didn't more vocally denounce this shit, it has no reason to exist other than power saving and they are supposed to be the types to either cancel corpos for their bullshit.

>>108457305
or suck corpo dick* lien bruce3434 sucks ebassi's

>>108457305
>CPC
well I know to test for that now
Seems really retarded and pointless

File: dghdrho.png (97 KB, 581x158)

97 KB PNG

>>108457305
It probably is that Outer dimming control option
I was planning on turning all of the shit like pixel shift off anyways

>>108457287
the difference is like 1-2 PPI

>>108457348
I know, my side hoes are 1440p 27 inch with my main being 4k 42 inch. The scaling is identical.

VRR or BFI?
I dont think you can have both at once

>>108457368
VRR

>>108457368
BFI sucks on those anyways

>>108446116
This. OLED is an idiot tax.

>>108457378
400 euro is a small invest for something you stare at all day
>>108457374
>>108457370
how does BFI suck?
Motion clarity is pretty important

>>108456659
no
also halo kinda stinks ngl
im playing on heroic and even magdumping an elite point blank doesnt finish it often
Every enemy is a bullet sponge, so far the sniper is the only half decent weapon and you dont get enough ammo for it
I was expecting so much more honestly
atleast the story is fun

From someone who has never touched halo before, thats my first experience with reach
im gonna probably play through the series its fun enough
It reminds of Metro 2033 in a way, but Metro is a much better game with much better gunplay obviously

>>108457388
Flicker, no VRR. OLEDs response time itself is nice though, for a sample and hold display, slow moving motion is very clear.
Either wait for Pulsar OLEDs or CRT sim shader to get better, instead of BFI.

>>108457416
>Pulsar OLEDs
Is there evidence that those will be a thing eventually?

>>108446530
Yup...!!!
On the other hand one have to think in simple terms like...

When this thing destroy itself what it doing to your eyes...

That is main question!

>>108457416
I see.
VRR only seems usefull in games with bad framerate locking, but for those it is probably better then BFI, screen tearing is annoying
>flicker
I would say I am very resistant to flicker
I am typing this on a CRT running at 60hz
id take a bit of flicker for better motion
>>108457428
Main issue is just how dimm it makes OLEDs
The tech exists, in VR headsets
VR strobing on a monitor would be a dream come true
pulsar still sucks dick compared to VR headsets or CRTs
VR headsets can actually match CRT motion clarity, and that 120hz not some crazy unreachable 480hz very impressive stuff

>>108450132
Blue hair<?

x)
x)

>>108457388
Hello idiot. Enjoy your tax.

>>108456436
sorry... can't stand
>glossy panel finishes
It may work for TV but
for monitor ...
gloss is so disturbing ...

unbearable!!!

>>108457471
hello thirdie
enjoy your cow shit

>>108457516
made me kek

>>108457492
Matte is actual subhuman tech that only tricks your brain into not noticing the reflections. If you use a glossy screen for a meaningful amount of time, you can never go back.

File: 1761919029422220.jpg (2.31 MB, 3840x7286)

2.31 MB JPG

>>108457492
Glossy looks so much better, specially if you live in a basement.

>>108457556
Glossy is the worst, especially if you're in a basement since you see your own disgusting reflection. Matte is the only option.

>>108456014
>miniLEDs can fuck up my eyes

>>108457560
>you see your own disgusting reflection
I don't.

>>108446084
>1440p
>OLED
lol enjoy your subpar text rendering

>>108457716
he bought a WOLED
won't be an issue with freetype

W OLED or QD oled and why?

>>108458626
It's LG phone vs Samsung phone.

>>108446116
Faggots who say stupid shit like this are always poorfags using some dogshit 1080p TN panel or something

>>108457716
You shouldn't be doing anything but gaming on an OLED monitor, I don't know why people don't get this since every single one is labelled as a gaming monitor for a reason. Especially with 1440p, just have some cheap shit IPS next to it for anything else and use the OLED for games only.

>>108457553
is this anon's claim true?

>>108458854
yes

>get new monitor
>rotate old monitor to secondary
>new monitor is so much better than my previous monitor that I want to buy another
No one told me about this

File: Umbau des Schlafzimmers (3).jpg (2.76 MB, 4000x2252)

2.76 MB JPG

>>108446084
Good, you won't regret

I saved over half a year and almost failed to get this 65 inch LG for about 1 K by 20 € but affording such device as a NEET alone is an archievement and you will not ever switch it for the next 10 years (depending how long it actually runs) unless you are a consumerist with too much money.

The energy efficiency is also nice, 65 inch draw 100-120 W max while a 55 inch LCD drew 150+.
>>108446116
I have this since 2022 and yet no burn in after 8# hours a day excessive gaming and watching. Still better than overpaying for shitty IPS at this point i would rather take quality TN over IPS like on my old monitor, in the end the "high end" IPS was just 8bit too and only added horrible bleed for the same overall image quality.

OLED burn in is most likely slow degradation if at all but it does not make the device unusable. You might get shadows eventually. Best way to prevent:

-Set down overall pixel brightness after you darkened your room (Saves power too)
-Run pixel cleaning cycle
-Screenturn off on idle or animated idle wallpaper

Otherwise it NEVER dies. My Acer AL1716 from around 2005 I got on Kleinanzeigen for shipping is so far the only one that ever died to me, but it was just the backlight but it was ancient anyway. I now have a 10 € 1080p shit monitor for my cellar setup.

>Oled monitors
Kek enjoy being cucked by chinkslop monitor manufacturers like Gaysus and Gigashyte. If you want a real oled buy a 42" TV ie LG C5 or Sony A90K or Panasonic MZ800B.

>>108461216
lg makes oled gaming monitors now. one is even 580Hz at 1440p and 720Hz at 720p (or something like that). the instant lg comes out with a 360Hz+ OLED with proper subpixel layout I'm buying one.

>>108457333
yeah one of these should be the shitty CPC from hell
also holy digits of the trinity

File: segsgsewa.png (234 KB, 547x938)

234 KB PNG

Its shipped

>>108458895
I do everything on the OLED, no downsides. So why?

>>108459178
See >>108457556

>>108461145
Don't you get NEETbux, gibs?

File: IMG_5575.png (692 KB, 676x720)

692 KB PNG

>>108446084
>mfw $200 27” mini led kt

>>108458626
qd-oled isn't as fucked. woled if you care only about peak brightness and don't care about it being shitty.

File: 6262.png (2.37 MB, 2004x2004)

2.37 MB PNG

>>108461145
living the life.
do you also have saved for a nice gaming PC?

>Ctrl +f "comfort"
>zero matches
i believe you guys are lowkey clueless. the real question about Oled is not burn in but viewing comfort if you work for long hours. it's the reason i opted against an IPS and went with VA instead. I don't want to burn my eyes out. that's my real question about OLED. im eyeing this laptop lenovo legion laptop and im worried it might be too uncomfortable after long hours.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AA7EeVkYpRs

File: 1774417907727880.png (1.22 MB, 486x1050)

1.22 MB PNG

>>108463968
good point.
I hope the OLED will be as comfortable as a CRT

I wonder how watching 1080p anime and movies will be on a 1440p panel?
tolerable scaling I hope

>>108463968
I've been using an OLED for one and a half years now, usually 8 - 16 hours a day since I'm a NEET and haven't had issues.

>>108464667
Do you disable taskbar?

>>108446116
i dropped 1k on a LG C2 during black week 2022 and I've been using it as a NEET since then for 10-12 hours a day without burn-in. I even played world of warcraft with a lot of static ui elements. How do you explain this? Just luck? It could be I guess
thanks

>>108464742
not him but I replied below you. yes i disable taskbar because it costs me nothing really. I might prefer the clean look of disabled taskbar. i just mouseover whenever i need it. I also dont use a lot of brightness unless i'm playing certain games

>>108464817
if you use it at low brightness it will never burn in
high brightness kills OLED
candle that burns brighter burns out faster my friend
if you are neet using it in dark room with low brightness it will never burn

>>108464742
How does the taskbar affect my eyes...?

has anyone actually ever used burn in warranty?
Do they accept slight burn?

>>108464876
>it will never burn in
>if you are neet using it in dark room with low brightness it will never burn
Uhm...

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monitors/comments/1pd1j6y/lg_c4_42_woled_burn_in_report_5300_hours_pure/

Sure it's literally nothing and it 5300 hours, but it was ran with low brightness and does have minor burn-in.

File: 1774488607866.jpg (38 KB, 520x589)

38 KB JPG

I have ran my oled at max brightnesd with peak brightness set to high for a year and I have no burn in. I think im gonna use a static wallpaper and not hide my taskbar because I dont really like the size I want 48 inches and I need an excuse to waste money

I hope no dead pixels
I dont want to have to return it again
>>108464896
>>108464913
5300 hours/1 year is absolutely nothing
A crt with 5300 hours is considered practically new

>>108464876
>if you are neet using it in dark room with low brightness it will never burn
brightness really matters this much? i hope you're right. but yeah i sit in the dark a lot, but even if i didnt i just dont need much brightness. it doesnt feel good for the eyes either .maybe normies max their brightness and think thats high fidelity

>>108464956
>brightness really matters this much?
of course, the harder you run them, the quicker they burn out

>>108464963
yes of course, i just don't know the degree to which it matters. you seem to place a lot of emphasis on it (low brightness lasting forever and high brightness dead in months)

>>108464966
afaik exponential wear
90% will last twice as long as 100%

File: 1322164307467.gif (1.53 MB, 320x240)

1.53 MB GIF

>>108446116
What sort of poorfag cope is this?
I've got a 3 year old OLED laptop I use for work every day and it has zero burn-in, even on a uniform grey background.
The moment I can buy a 4k 120Hz OLED monitor with a Thunderbolt dock/KVM I'm not going back to IPS.

>>108464998
yep

>>108462292
>See
I see
not being able to let in some daylight without rendering the screen next to useless seems like a pretty massive tradeoff however, and allegedly one can always perform matte coating removal surgery if they find they don't like the coating

>>108465425
hey idiot?
The glossy coating actually performs better in bright rooms
All matte does is make the screen blurry and distribute reflections
with matte you are still getting the same amount (or more) of reflections just blurry
Matte is pretty much worse in every scenario unless you would rather have a blurry monitor then see your ugly face

>>108465425
Unless the light (aka window) is directly behind or in front of the monitor, side light barely makes a difference.

File: IMG_20251110_155154.jpg (369 KB, 4096x3072)

369 KB JPG

plasma

>>108446084
When is true RGB-stripe oled happening? I am gonna get one as soon as there's no compromises on text clarity or anything.

>>108468171
Soon.

>no compromises on text clarity
See >>108457724 & >>108456599

>>108466793
>has plasma
you don't even need an OLED

>>108469569
>woled
I have literally zero usecase for a white subpixel. I'm not gonna be carrying my monitor out to use in the noonday sun, I don't fucking need my colours to be fake and washed out just for the arbitrary benchmark 6 million nits.

File: 1743490153271798.png (1.27 MB, 1276x836)

1.27 MB PNG

>build my PC
>shit it runs great but I gotta upgrade my monitor
>oh shit my main TV broke Okay I'll replace that, OLED obviously
>oh shit my phone broke I'll replace that OLED obviously
>I wanna buy a watch I'll get a brand new fitness watch OLED obviously
>You know what I'll upgrade my table too OLED obviously
>Okay I guess it's time for an OLED monitor
>been a few years now they should be in a great place like literally every other screen I use
>mfw

>>108469594
Look at the color space specs. It's still far above average even with the white subpixel.

>>108469594
Why get an OLED if you don't even use HDR?
It's mainly for gaming and media, you can look at the desktop in good quality on an IPS too.

>>108469600
>>oh shit my main TV broke Okay I'll replace that, OLED obviously
It's the same shit.

>>108469602
I don't know you tell me, everyone on /g/ always says everyone without an OLED is a poorfag

File: 1762993555457382.png (132 KB, 1080x810)

132 KB PNG

>>108469600
I'd rather take pic related over IPS glow
Even with a set-up text like the 5% gray it's still hard to even see with the naked eye

>>108469609
That's true. OLED is the least shit display tech we have and only poorfags seethe about burn-in.

File: eyebrows.png (2.1 MB, 1601x1109)

2.1 MB PNG

Get a plasma an enjoy chinese and/or yanks cartoons wihtout having to upscale to 4K and with better motion. Looks great on this 65VT30 with an ultra-high 34ppi.
I am kinda nettled that people were enjoying near OLED quality back in the mid 2000s while I was stuck with shitty LCDs til I got an OLED.

>>108469853
Plasma and OLED are both emissive with similar motion

>>108469853
OP has a plasma >>108466793

>>108469922
OLED uses sample and hold while plasmas and CRT not.

File: IMG_20251110_155513.jpg (349 KB, 4096x3072)

349 KB JPG

>>108469853
I have my Plasma, but its offcourse not useable as a Monitor.
I tried once
I use it for movies and VNs and nintendo switch
>>108470216
Eh this is a bit misleading
Plasma motion is better then Sample and hold, but its not great
It does not even come close to CRT
A strobed OLED should be on the same leevl as a Plasma

>>108469853
how bad is scaling on 1080p shows on a 1440p panel?
i am quite curiuos about that

File: 1760019043369153.jpg (49 KB, 656x679)

49 KB JPG

I have a shed full of CRT televisions and monitors
I'm set for life

>>108470881
what will you do when you have to move out of your mom's place

File: 0.jpg (702 KB, 1500x2000)

702 KB JPG

>>108470881
Post pics.

>>108470887
>doesn't get the house inherited

File: IMG_20260216_020705.jpg (909 KB, 4096x3072)

909 KB JPG

>>108470881
they are all slowly dying even if you are not using them.
I have many crts too
but here is just high end crt issues alone:
>91txm capacitor issues
>Flat hitachi, flyback blew up
>2060U PSU detonation
>500PS geometry IC failure
smoke em while you got em
replacing PSU electrolytics is also not a bad idea preemptively
>>108470889
nice 2060u
I have a Totoku with NF Diamondtron tube and a Phillips
Have a 2060u too, but mines broken sadly

>>108469594
White subpixels display white on black or black on white text the best, just turn off the cleartype meant for 2006 TN screens

>>108471120
Subpixel AA is meant to use all of the subpixels. Using only the white one would mean that the effective resolution of the text is limited to whole pixels only.
Also I use multiple OSes, cleartype is on windows, is there an easy fix on linux or on wayland for example? It just sounds like way too much bother for a special snowflake display

>>108471577
Works on my machine. Just installed MacType (FreeType port to Windows) and applied the profile some autismo carefully crafted specially for my display. Done, never touched it again.
Oh and this is using all subpixels since it works with arbitrary subpixel layouts unlike ClearType.

>>108472396
sit on the electron gun so it slides into your pooper

I NEED A FUCKING OLED MONITOR

A GOOD ONE

>>108469600
NOT THIS CRAP

>>108475303
Wait a couple years more, current OLED monitor are 3-5 years behind laptops, phones, tvs. My laptop from 2025 has HDR TrueBlack 1000; dunno why they are delaying higher brightness on monitors desu.

Drove past a barbershop earlier this week and a guy was in there playing Earthbound on a VHS/CRT TV

>>108446084
why is there only 1 picture of hyperborea?

File: 1755340499849337.png (59 KB, 259x194)

59 KB PNG

>>108469610
>id rather have a permanently damaged monitor than a mildly annoying and made up feature

File: sgesgssgdgdg.png (11 KB, 65x90)

11 KB PNG

>>108475528
Yes I would.
My phone has a burned in AMOLED where the UI to some mobile game the previous owner played is permanently visible and it still looks 10x better then my old phone with LCD screen
Burned in OLED looks bad in bright scenes
LCD looks bad in every scene
btw the test they did where you took that pic from showed LCDs burn out first and are less reliable
if you buy an LCD its backlight will die before OLED gets burn in
LCDtards cannot stop losing

>>108475711
i dont know what planet you are from but its not the same as mine. nothing you are writing is even vaguely true
oled burns out in under a year in some cases. its extremely noticeable
i have a 10 year old tn panel that looks fine other than sneeze juice all over it
my only conclusion is you are that indian oled shill that spams here on /v/ and /g/

File: morgen.png (37 KB, 616x205)

37 KB PNG

>>108475773
So in conclusion, you are poor which is excusable, but also retarded.
There is no reason to use a TN anything ever.
You could be using a CRT which certainly would outperform your shit panel
>burns out in under a year
good thing the panel has a 3 year warranty
>shill
>indian
My new OLED is arriving tommorow
The first one I got arrived broken >>108450580
so im pretty sure i allready cost the company all of the profit they would have made on me lol

File: IMG_20260308_205609.png (3.89 MB, 2976x3968)

3.89 MB PNG

>>108475773
This is the burn in on my OLED phone btw visible on grey but fine in actual usage

>>108475792
tn is for gaming and ips is for everything else
crts are dogshit for retro fetishists
im old enoguh to have used them when they werent pulled from a dumpster moments before demise. they sucked.
there is a very good chance i make more money than you
>so im pretty sure i allready cost the company all of the profit they would have made on me lol
oh youre literally a teenager

>>108475823
any crt is better then your TN dogshit piss of luddite

>>108475792
>There is no reason to use a TN anything ever.
Other than avoiding glow, ghosting, and burn-in all at once

>>108446084
If it's not a 27", kys.

>>108476048
>glow
my TN has that
>ghosting
lol
>burn in
my TN had image retention
CRT is unironically better in every way
>>108476053
it is

>>108446084
>1440p
lol

>>108476088
You have a shitty TN then
>CRT
Are also good but suffer from 100x price markup due to having been out of production for decades, only available models are ancient used cummed-on ones, and the displays are also tiny and usually low resolution by modern standards (I know you can get large ones but those ultra-rare models cost 1000x more, and you'll still never find a 4k CRT) and low refresh rates (I know they're blur-free but it still increases input lag). If you can find a perfect CRT then yeah it's gonna be pretty good but you can damn well find a high-end modern TN with basically zero issues, other than the sample-and-hold LCD blur, for WAY less effort and time and money than that

File: 59544.jpg (88 KB, 1024x768)

88 KB JPG

>>108476106
speak for yourself, I have a dozen high end CRTs im playing Halo CE on one right now
>shitty TN
They all are, and I have one of the better ones with gloss coating
>caring about input lag
>using a 10 year old TN
are you just retarded?
I would bet my CRT even at low refresh has less input delay then your dogshit 2010s panel with signal processing.
you are honest to god defending the worst era of displays we have ever had, im glad OLED saved us from LCD hell even if its not perfect

crt---

9950X3D2 they told me so many times it'd never happen and now here we are I'm so hype I hope it finally means no core parking bullshit just run whatever on any CCD you want no fucking problems finally an endgame AM5 chip

File: 20240216_211733.jpg (2.23 MB, 3984x2988)

2.23 MB JPG

I cant wait to get my hands on it and finally try HDR

>>108478530
Wrong thread but yo no way, they're actually doing that?
I already got 9800x3d so I'm probably not gonna bother but it makes me mildly happy that they finally fixed the ccd clusterfuck on the __50x series

>>108478796
>HDR
If you want HDR buy a TV these monitors are a joke
HDR is such a joke on them they had to make up that "trueblack hdr" shit because they can't hit real HDR standards
And the insanely aggressive ABL on all these monitors again makes them worthless

If fps isn't your goal get the TV for sure

>>108479549
it does over 1000nits in HDR should be good right?
certainly better then any lcd

>>108457492
matte faggots are absolute filth

>>108446084
>OLED
>rather than just waiting for QDEL
Its honestly the only panel tech ive really been excited about in a long time. OLED is nice visually but it really needs to be phased out. Its a shit, overly expensive, disposable tech that nearly 20 years on is still being figured out

>>108481066
I'm also in the waiting for QDEL boat but there's a lot that can go wrong with it considering it doesn't exist yet as an actual product AFAIK
part of me thinks it would make sense to get an OLED as soon as true RGB panels come out and only adopt QDEL once the initial kinks have been ironed. on the other hand, it's true that all QDEL has to accomplish is beat LCDs which is a pretty low bar

>>108481202
Isnt qd oled rb oled

>>108482016
No, different pixel arrangement. We want striped pixel RGB.

>>108479549
Do you use a TV as a monitor? How is it?

>>108446084
youre gonna regret not getting 4k man. most movies and videos are in 4k these days

>>108483569
nobody watches movies anymore unc

>>108484805
But uncs do?

File: Church of the Holy IPS.jpg (109 KB, 1224x1632)

109 KB JPG

>>108475528
>mildly annoying
kek. Dynamic and interactive unavoidable burn in straight from the factory.

File: 1774877733035834.jpg (3.52 MB, 4000x3000)

3.52 MB JPG

it finally arrived, I have to say, you would be very stupid to buy an LCD nowadays
ABL can be completely disabled in the menu, and even at 50% brightness in SDR mode it is insanely bright to me
I disabled most of the OLED care stuff like dimming, but I kept Pixel shift on cause why not
Motion is way worse then CRT, but the static image quality is so good
ill test it at 240hz now for games, for media OLED is perfection

>1440p
Cope resolution

>>108485757
Time to play Crimson Desert.

File: 92714048_p0.png (3.33 MB, 1230x2106)

3.33 MB PNG

>>108485831
Absolute slop trash
time to play Halo 2

>>108485897
>believing games journalists

>>108469600
don't stare at grey test patterns all day?

File: 20260330_180608.jpg (3.22 MB, 4000x3000)

3.22 MB JPG

Anti OLED pajeets lost
Billions must enjoy accurate and beautifull colors and deep contrast

>>108446084
>1440p

You either stay at 1080p or go 4K. Anything in between is terrible.

File: 20260330_180919.jpg (3.22 MB, 4000x3000)

3.22 MB JPG

>>108486512
Why

>maybe if a post a few more angles someone will finally respond to my bait!!
Yes yes, your desk is shit, your keyboard is dirty, your speaker mounting is rickety, your pristine anime figurines contrast with the mess in the rest of your room, happy? This isn't /bst/ you can fuck off now

>>108486512
>shit scaling for desktop: either everything is too small (100% scaling on windows was designed for 90ish ppi), or you have to use 125/150% which will cause icons and shit to blur out, 4k at 24 inch with 200% scaling is perfect in this regard but jews stopped making that.
>shit scaling for media: everything is either 1080p or 4k, there's pretty much no native 1440p content out there, most hq stuff is still only 1080p (regular blu ray) and will be blurry upscaled to 1440p, 4k stuff will technically look better on a 1440p screen compared to a 1080p one but most 4k content is still only low bitrate streamslop where resolution is the least of your concerns.
So gaming is pretty much the only thing 1440p works with, but most games nowdays are blurry taa slop which looks horrendous regardless of resolution, and with dlss/fsr 4k target res will always look better than 1440p at equal performance so yeah it kinda makes 0 sense for gaming also these days.
1440p cannot even be considered a jack of all trades it's just one of the worst options for anything really.

>>108486768
rude.

>>108457226
>8k would be really nice at that resolution

Eeehm, actually we are, current hardware can run older games like witcher 3 and battlefield 4 at 8k maxed out (no anti aliasing)

So dont spread misinformation

Source: i have 8k display and played these games on it
Pretty cheap too, costed me only 340 euro used

File: g2auK.png (90 KB, 731x599)

90 KB PNG

>1440p
I've had a 24" 1440p IPS for 10 years now, it's nice but after all this time it's still been just small pixels. Starting to be ready for 4K making the pixels finally go away. No one should need to know what subpixel rendering is.

File: grafik.png (883 KB, 1363x781)

883 KB PNG

One slightly annoying thing:
I have the new R version and they removed some settings from the menu
this is the old version of the monitor

File: 20260330_201251.jpg (531 KB, 4000x3000)

531 KB JPG

and here is my Monitors menu.
You can turn off logo detection, but taskbar detection and boundary detection you cannot toggle off anymore
I guess they had to RMA a few too many panels due to taskbar burn in
Its a bit noticable in the web browser with the tabs, id like to disable it but whatever

1440p in 2026 lol

>>108487360
>>108487368
No service menu?

>>108490079
Well its an XG27AQDMGR
I cant find any info on how to acces SM
Infact I couldnt even find anything except 1 reddit post about them removing settings

I couldnt sleep long today because I was excited to keep on playing with my OLED
beauty

>>108491329
ew

File: 1766067480232456.jpg (504 KB, 2170x1270)

504 KB JPG

>>108491329
miniled at that size is poop

>>108490136
On samsung's old qled it was you gotta press middle then held left or right for a few secs and calibration menu would show up, service was a special plug
MSI had you unplug, then hold the button while replugging it or something like it
It's gotta be something similar with the current OLEDs? Maybe you gotta send a special usb packet to access it considering they now make the osd settings accessible through their app on PC via usb

>>108491409
Doesn't it use DDC? It's been a thing for ages to control the monitor over DDC.

>>108485757
>>108485897
Play CE on your oled at 240hz ranfag
it's really good for old games that were made with crt black levels in mind

>>108446116
fpbp

>>108485323
how do backlight fags even put up with this, damn

File: 53648513648.jpg (41 KB, 405x720)

41 KB JPG

>>108486494
SOVL setup.

>>108446084
What are you woling?