I don't use Arch, BTW
>deletes all opposing view posts>"100% of linux users support age verification integration into the kernel!"welcome to /r/eddit
>>108446265Arch sisters...
>>108446311Except he's talking about the official Arch forums, you retarded brown mongoloid.
>>108446265>NOTEWORTHYkek
Fuck off, retard.
>>108446345>I need to form an opinion on whether age verification is good or bad!the answer should be clear, fuck these goycattle
>>108446438There is always Void.
>>108446345>We're making up our minds>No, you may not have any input on the discussionOPEN SORES
>>108446448Void and possibly Gentoo are our only hope.Reason: they aren't funded by corporations or governments. Arch took the money
>>108446265I wish they would do the same to /g/. how many fucking threads about this shit?
>>108446345german twink is retarded, its a simple yes or no question and they had a year to anticipate this and days after dylanmtranny obliterated soistemd to answer it (with no), let arch die, aryans are on artix either way
>>108446460You could always go to reddit
>>108446451correct. why should anyone suffer listening to a low IQ goycattle such as yourself?
>>108446479>Only superior high IQ people know WEF is right and globalism is the wayWe will murder you
I use macOS btw
>>108446451>>108446457>YESSSS GOY INSTALL VOID AND CONPLETELY DESTROY YESRS OF SETTINGS AND TWEAKS AND CONFIGS FOR A UNSTABLE SHITRO, SO IN A YEAR ITLL BE COMPLETELY USELESSYou retards DO realize all websites and online services will require a verification token before they grant you access right? You don't think that's where all this is going to end up and fast?Your little shitty weekend warrior distro will be rendered useless when that finally gets implemented.
>>108446731I'm not hearing any solutions. You sound like a consume product redditor
>>108446345>duplicating existing topicswell stop locking them then lol
>>108446265i already jumped ship. arch has fallen
>>108446328Yes, Arch is just deleting everything. Every post in the forums (they directly moderate) and on Reddit (whose cuckmods would happily slurp holy nectar from their cocks). They clearly don't want people to have any place to voice their opinion or to organize.
>>108446731>online services will require a verificationthey are lobbying politicians exactly so they can make the os do that instead of them
>>108446753there are no solutions, moron. you have no power.
>>108446833>you
>>108446844yes, (You).
>>108446862(You) means yourself, newfren
>>108446731Guess I'll have to off myself when it's implemented everywhere. Too bad.
>>108446826Right, the os verifies your age and provides a token to the website letting you access it. No token, no access. They just want the burden of verification to be on the os, not them.
>>108446265Deal with it, chud. Now, all rise for the anthem of California. Heil Newsom.https://youtu.be/ACxVxbvJQ0o
>>108446438>basement-dwelling incels who've never had friends or colleagues don't understand the concept of being part of a team and achieving consensus
>>108446265The pedophile elites really need to know your kids ages why can't you just be normal and upload their picture ID's?
>>108446451What have you contributed to the Arch Linux project that entitles you to a say on its future direction? Feel free to fuck off and use a meme protest distro (like Artix) if Arch no longer suits your needs. That's the beauty of open source software and freedom of choice. Otherwise you're going to need to change your diaper and shut the fuck up.
>>108447349I'm not going to shut up. I'm going to openly mock people who use this government-funded bullshit distro
>>108446265so Gentoo and lfs are the only safe distros now...i see.
>>108446265it's a nothing burger of a change. it's a meta data fdield that is optional to fill out.picerel is @gemini
>>108447461of course the pedo's are furious
>>108447461You appear to be lost, fren.
>>108447471you must think I give a shit what you think
Who the fuck doesn't use an Arch-fork in the big '26?
>>108447366Enjoy screaming into the void whilst people laugh at you and then get on with their day.>>108447471You appear to be retarded, retard.
>>108447322>We're still coming to a consensus as to whether our Indian colleagues shitting in their office chairs is a negative for team morale.
Shouldn’t age verification be in the kernel?
>>108447487Nobody in this thread is talking about your shit init system, pootering.
Can someone explain to me how they'll even implement this? Will you just not be able to complete the configuration of your machine without connecting to your local government's surveillance tool?
>>108447626Probably. Welcome to the future.
>>108446900You gonna pass a law? File a federal injunction?
>>108447061It's a good idea, in theory, but it can't be implemented without leaking PID. Their solution will be to force the cybercriminals to participate in the same dragnet as everyone else, which likely won't work, and would likely have the obvious sorts of results that one would expect.
>>108447543calm down, Satan
>>108446457Atrix.
>>108447061>No token, no access.Good. I don't want access to such a site. I will download everything I care about before this becomes widespread, and then abandon the internet for a probate network.
>>108447892private*
>>108447543Yes, it should not only be in the kernel, but there needs to be hardware tokens and switches (think Samsung Knox fuses but a little different) in hardware like GPUs and bios, eg you can't enable hardware GPU access until drivers are age verified and it prevents you from running stable diffusion or uncensored LLMs etc
>>108446265If I had to guess, it's because this age verification shit is a massive disinfo/FUD attack on Linux. If threads here are anything to go by, hysteria and emotional nonsense is off the charts while hard, grounded arguments driving reasonable discussions involving facts and logic are nowhere to be found.
>>108447984SHUTIT DOWN
>>108447996Yeah that's the thing. You retards throw tantrums and overreact on purpose giving (((them))) the justification for aggressive moderation.
>>108447543kernel? you mean systemd-vmlinuzd, right?
>>108446939Turn the violence outwards to someone who deserves it
>>108448028We're just putting them on notice. >NOOOOO! YOU CAN'T VOICE YOUR WRONGTHINKEnjoy your germanbux while you still can
>>108446731what the fuck is this? it is just a init system, you can make this shit out of a shell scriptfuck you
>>108448279>still strawmanningSpeak your mind all you want. All I'm saying is that it might help to make some effort to be truthful, objective and earnest (responding to every post as if it is a subversive attack, while also saying nothing true or substantial, is the opposite of this.If I was seeing good arguments, honest arguments, informed arguments, I'd support them no matter how passionately they opposed age verification. But I'm not seeing that and every lazy no-content shitpost you fling just makes it worse.
>>108446731this guy has had this same meltdown on every single thread about this topic by the wayprobably got filtered by cfdisk
>>108449136>filtered by cfdiskI just realized that was a thing yesterday. Fucking partition magic-style point and click gui. I've been sitting there with fdisk all these years like a caveman.
>>108446265they are against the CoC, you biggotted cis scum!
>>108447892whats better, a probate or a masterbate?
>>108446265arch is - ironically, considering the name "arch" itself, innit? - x86 only.It was DOA.
I'll just use forks and AUR packages if the shit gets annoying. Or switch the distro. I'm too tired of doomposting.
>>108446345Arch is compromised
>>108446265There are literally 3 threads on this topic on the Arch forum, 2 of them are closed and every single one of them has literally no posts of any value in them.Except posts like this one, which say very little>>108446345
>>108447395lfs not a distro
>>108446265>age verification is becoming part of systemd>systemd is a core part of Archtherefore, age verification is becoming a part of Arch.
>>108446448>void I have been using it for over 3 years now and all I can say is that it's somewhat stable but when shit breaks or behaves unexpectedly good luck finding help among those 5-6 people that maintain it. and yes, the most active maintainer is a tranny
>>108450168Any project with a CoC is compromisedIt's like a tattoo on a whore. You immediately know to avoid.
>>108453388Void has consistently been more stable for me than any other Linux distro or Windows 10/11.
>>108447349i like the sound of fuck systemd
>>108453632except when packages are kept not updated for longer than on debianglibc was kept at 2.32 for 2 years I think
>>108447543>>108447931And this hardware should be a satellite connected neuralink!
>>108453662If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Please german tranny, do not redeem systemdalit krishna birthday or that will be the final straw and im going to afro ergonomic computing distro by niggers, for niggers.Artix.
>>108446448wasn't Void abandoned (at least for a while)? remeber switching to some weird distro after Crunchbang got axed... not corpo owned, custom package manger - seems it was Void.. but maintaner wasn't updating it for quite some time and people though he abandoned it..
>>108446731>all websites and online services will require a verification token before they grant you accessFirst, that would stop ai bots, which is unthinkable in current year. If they add some exception I'll piggyback on that and instead of a bot pretending to be human I'll be a human pretending to be a bot.Second. Good fucking riddance.
>>108454041>First, that would stop ai bots, which is unthinkable in current year. IfWhy would it? I would bot with my real name. Just like I already do nowadays. This isn't about banning bots, it's about doxing and locating you and your relatives when you make statements.Automation isn't illegal, it is what puts food on your table, ungrateful dimwit.
>>108454527Your boss asks you to set up a bot on his infra and you use your name? Surely not. The boss name? Does Google crawler bots run under Nadella's age id token? Surely not. Dumb retards running bots on their own names are nothing. 90% of internet traffic is big corpos bots. If requiring them to provide age of consent ID of a real person, they'll be banned. If they provide "hello, I'm a scrapper bot" ID, they'll be banned by a lot of sites. So they'll have to fake "henlo, I'm surely a human, pls let me in, here's my credentials". But corpos get audits, so if the bot gives ID saying he's adult, if it's fake ID that's illegal and won't get OK stamp on audit. So they VVILL have a backdoor for them that will look like human traffic from the server pov.
>>108454659Well> Does Google crawler bots run under Nadella's age id token?Trump does it that way, in a way. His company is his name turned into a legal contract. You can turn your bank account into a company bank account. From that point on you and your name are a company, able to run crawlers just like Google.Look how far Trump got with this strategy. Sorry for having Trump derangement syndrome and bringing in politics here, but before Trump was a politician he taught exactly that. How companies work. What they even are.I am 100% sure that Elon Musk is botting using robots using his real name. He even claims so on a stage, in front of an audience. He does so with his real name.I'm not trying to be correct at all costs, I am merely autistic about this whole topic. One day I was like "wtf is a company anyways"
>>108454971Okay, autist-anon, but other than celebs like Trump and Elon who live off their public image, I doubt most other bots use the big guy's real name: bot crawls into some CP, "your name is on this, sir, off to jail you go". Bosses wouldn't pull responsibilities like that on their own name for no reason, they'd try to convince the dev to use his name instead, and if he's a retard he would. Again, this is still not being used, I'm waiting to see how it will be used. Because there will be some loophole.
>>108446731You mean all those shitty little establishmentcuck websites and services will be rendered useless
>>108446438Whether the verification itself is good or bad isn't the issue, it's whether or not to comply with the law. The consequences have to measured both ways.
>>108455034Telegram has bots, its owner got arrested in france last year.
