I just found out today that LLM was invented by an Indian. Why did /g/ lie to me and say that Indians have low IQs?
Because you're an idiot who doesn't understand statistics.
>>108449349There’s about 1.5 billion Indians, no one is surprised that they can produce a few smart ones. What’s shocking is that they shit in the street while the average IQ is in the toilet.
>LLMs were invented by an IndianMakes sense. I think the last time something worthwhile came from India it was still under British rule or something.
>>108449361Statistically speaking, Indians are more likely to become CEOs of big tech companies than any races.>>108449362>>108449381Cope is strong.
>>108449410Yeah, because they infiltrate them like cancer.
>>108449349attention is all you need is one of the worst papers ever and it doesn't involve the invention of the attention layers kek the only thing this paper did is plague the ml research world with the suffix "is all you need" for 5 years
>>108449519You just proved that you have a really low IQ. Imagine calling a paper that has been cited 240k times one of the worst papers ever. That paper literally proposed the transformer(the foundation of all LLMs). You probably couldn’t understand it because your IQ is too low.
>>108449537No u.
>>108449349Heading a project =/= You created something.It means you directed the people who created something.
>>108449537We had LLMs before transformer models, it just improved it
>>108449537A paper proposing the idea of transformers isn't exactly 'creating it'. Nothing groundbreaking is ever created by a single person.And if Jeets weren't so slimey and obsessed with their image enough to lie out their ass then maybe people would be willing to give the smart ones credit for shit like this.
>>108449362>no one is surprisedμ=76, σ=15, x=145; P(X>x) = ~0in other words, the odds a given indian is IQ >145 is effectively zero
>>108449657I hope you weren't trying to refute the other statement with that argument.
>>108449707i'm refuting the idea nobody is surprised; i am surprised
>>108449723You're surprised that India can produce 'a few smart ones'? That should be obvious on its face. You're trying to argue that an Indian selected at random is unlikely to be smart. See the logical disconnect?
>>108449759the product of 1.5 billion and effectively zero is... effectively zero
>>108449900Are you black?
>>108449519Which one invented attention layers?
>>108449349Neural networks were developed by Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts in the 1940s you fucking retard.
>>108449969Based. You'll hear a lot of people skip their work and just credit Rosenblatt.
>>108449969That dead faggot couldn't even demonstrate how to learn it, retard. Anyone can come up with random shit ideas.
>>108449519dunning kruger post
/gee/ has for always says that AI is actual Indians xD
>>108449498Pajeets can’t “infiltrate” due to being the color of feces. They are appointed, by kikes. For what purpose is a mystery; probably some poopskin clan is actually a lost tribe of Israel.
