The sabotage begins. Opendesktop/Redhat get control of grub. Immediately start stripping functionality out of grub to push users to systemd-boot. In a year or to we'll hear about how you shouldn't use grub because it lacks features. Disgusting.
>>108451378The fuck. They seriously believe nobody is going to raise an eyebrow at this?
lunduke thread, kill yourself kike. Link and quote exactly what you seem problematic instead of rage baiting you faggot.
>>108451414checked the ubuntu forum discussion about it. already pushing people to systemd-boot.
Just use something else. You don't need specific distros to use linux
>>108451427>distro supports one init>people are asked to used the best tested and supported init for that distro wow you really showed me you fat bearded faggot. Install another distro you metrosexual. What happened to your OP about removing features from GRUB. Whatever that means you stupid fucking homosexual. Kill yourself
>>108451442Systemd-boot doesnt have themes?!? Dropped, not using that ugly shit. And who uses something else than grub.
>>108451456I use it for my prepackaged images with specific purposes like rescue, mining or thin client images. It's easier to set up in that config than grub if you are using systemDick anyway
>>108451378>In a year or to we'll hear about how you shouldn't use grub because it lacks features.Wrong. You will hear about Grub being used only by reactionary dipshits and having Hitler bytes o algo.
>>108451378Who uses ubuntu?
Guys its protect the kids, stop being racist chuds.
>>108451378That says Ubuntu not Redhat.
>>108451378Will I be able to make systemd-boot play music like I can in GRUB?>>108451555trips of truth. I tired of these neckbeards dictating how my wife's son, Aiden, has to use his mandatory chromebook
>>108451545>ubuntu cripples grub, everyone switches to systemd-boot because they have to>ubuntu drops grub because no one uses it>ubuntu switched to systemd and it went ok, so debian should also>fedora drops grub cause debian and ubuntu have. grub development stalls just like x11.>>108451574you really think the tranny network doesn't span both companies? this is all organized sabotage.
>>108451456>I NEED to theme my bootloaderTotal Ricer Death
>>108451378Why does Canonical even care about Grub? Just stop signing it altogether and only support systemd-boot. Why put the effort in to make a bad version of Grub that lacks any of the features people actually use Grub for? What a bunch of disingenuous scammers.
>>108451378man, before it was oracle, like i really dont like redhat, but is still an improvement
>>108451442As you see on your own table, only GRUB supports TPM variables, and so, secure boot.
>>108451378>muh security>dropping support for LUKSwhat did Mark Shathimselfworth mean by this
>>108451592I'm sure it's trannies on top of trannies all the way down, I already switched to systemd-boot though years ago because grub is a steaming pile of shit and always has been even before they put a 2 after it.
>>108451670I mean you can still encrypt your system except the boot partition.
>>108451378how is having these features a security risk? Does grub implement these thing itself or does it call out to libraries?
>>108451405People did, IBM owns Redhat and they are implementing DEI
>>108451595Yes I do because Im hot and my laptop should be hot to. As an ugly person, you would not understand.
>>108451800GRUB is basically a simple operating system that boots the real operating system. The code might be copied from somewhere else but they have to include it in GRUB. Although because it's GNU slop they would only use GPLv3 code.
"If you can't beat them, sabotage them"
I seriously hope the F/OSS community learns from this assault and puts up better legal, technical and social barriers against it in the future.
>btrfs>LVM>LUKSThat covers I would guess the majority of systems which aren't completely standard. That said, most Ubuntu systems probably are completely standard.Secure Boot is a bit of a pointless meme imo anyway. If you run IT for a company or you let out machines that get used by a lot of different people, I guess I can see the use. Pointless for a home user. If an attacked has physical access, it's over.Anyway, for me, it's EFISTUB.
>>108451933secure boot will be mandatory in the future for digital ID verification. they want systemd to be the platform for this.
Elilo chads win again
on-disk bootloaders are cringe and redundant for uefi platforms.that being said i'd switch to petitboot instantly if somebody were to port it to amd64.
Sabotage will continue until morale improves
this is just about grub supporting booting from those things not restricting you from using them after the kernel is loaded, eg having /boot on btrfs instead of fat32 for some reason in the uefi eraif you hate systemd and dont want to use grub now either on artix you can just make a unified kernel image and boot it directly with no bootloader middleman https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unified_kernel_image
>>108452103>initramfsStopped reading.
>uefilegacy bios
>>108451666who cares about secure boot?
>>108451405People have been rising eyebrows since they began shitting up the desktop with GTK 3.What are you going to do, throw a tantrum on the nazi incel forum known as 4chan? Complain on Reddit and get banned in 5 minutes for being a Chud?
>>108452257Voting Democrats, like in Florida.
SystemDalit
>>108451378HE TRIED TO WARN US
>>108451378opendesktop slop
The issue with Redhat is first And foremost that they help Jews steal from gentiles and rape, mutilate and murder gentiles.Anything else comes second. Say it after me OP.
>>108451701>we made it less secure.. for security reasons
>>108451378>speed through age verification in systemd>shut down all complaints or discussion>sabotage grub to ruin everyone downstream>"just use systemd-boot"Yeah this is a coordinated attack
>>108452671So it seems...
>>108451378>Ubuntu>Canonical>Blames redhat
>>108451442>no MSI board compatibility on grubhow come?inxi -MMachine: Type: Desktop Mobo: Micro-Star model: B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) v: 1.0find /boot -name grub/boot/grub
inxi -MMachine: Type: Desktop Mobo: Micro-Star model: B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) v: 1.0find /boot -name grub/boot/grub
>>108451442>no MSI board compatibility with GRUBworks on my machine
>>108451939This is a terrifying prospect.Probably exactly what they want. This would effectively brick your computer without ID verification.
>>108453552>>108451939xeddit is that way you stupid faggots. You can't cash in you's for money, take your bait elsewhere.
>>108453664The fuck are you talking about. Do you even understand how signed boot works
