Let's pretend that picrel is a genuine program and it works exactly as advertised (providing a software interface to time travel, likely taking advantage of some fictional "accelerator" card). Who would be allowed to use it, how much would it cost, and what would the implications be?
>>108455861Courts.
nobody would be allowed to use itimplications would be total destruction of the universe
>>108455870>sets sqwimble to 100Not my problem
>gets wrong lat/long valuesoops >>108455935based sqwimble enjoyer
is this WSG84 thread?
>1.3Imagine the horrors that happened at 1.0 that made all those improvements necessary
>>108455870The timeline the user was in before using the program would stay untouched. He'd just slip into a different timeline that he's fucking up.
>>108456207I still have nightmares about that cat...
>>108456262HERP DERP FUNNI HL2 REFERNCE XDDD
1.2 didn't account for the movement of earth through space.
LOL. I remember the days when I was delusional enough to think I could build and program a time machine. Thanks, Chronovisor. Anyway, this isn't a problem of software ethics. It doesn't matter if the time machine is controlled with knobs and dials or embedded Windows. The entire tech would render life meaningless. Why bother with anything when you can just piss off to another timeline as soon as you face the slightest inconvenience?>>108456262What cat?
what about a "wayforwardmachine" like waybackmachine but it lets you see the web's future on a designated page. Forgot about the realism - just think about how fun that would be from 2026 to 2046. But the browser might not be able to hold future formats. Though maybe not much will change
