Isn't Arch supposed to be bleeding edge? You might as well use Debian stable at this point.
>>108466767>Arch "We ban you if you question the ID verification we are implementing" LinuxNot even once.
>>108466899proof?
>>108466767you can get it from the testing repos if you want it that badly, itll probably be a buggy mess. all new gnome releases are always riddled with them
>>108466767arch uses the lastest stable version, its not "bleeding edge"
>>108466903Go to arch subreddit and try to ask about it. See what happens.
>>108466918>Go to arch subredditno, prefer killing myself
>>108466925You prefer killing yourself to sharing an OS with retarditors? What a position to be in.
>>108466942no, i prefer killing myself over going on reddit, no OS come into play here
>>108466918r/archlinux is a fanmade subreddit
>>108466949The OS you are using is primarily ran and used by the people you refuse to visit on reddit. Make it make sense.
>>108466983>hitler used a car>you use a car>you are hitlertry harder cunt
>>108466998Hitler didnt use a car made by his enemies.
>>108467013Hitler also ACKed himself. Your point?
>>108467252You should continue to follow your leaders.
>>108466918>Nooo I got banned for making death threats to the maintainers. I am being silenced!
>>108466767>Isn't Arch supposed to be bleeding edge?No, it's rolling release. It's never been anything else. They push the latest stable release of a software after confirming everything that depends on it basically works (read: builds and runs). Fedora and OpenSUSE are both way way more unstable than Arch and push actual beta releases to prod for some reason.
>>108466767Use case for bleeding-edge GNOME trash?
>>108466899>Not even once.I'm already off it and won't ever be donating again. Arch might as well be a dead distro, with that shit.>>108466903>"Spoonfeed me like a baby!"No.
>>108466918r/archlinux isn't official, but a retard like you wouldn't know that.
>>108466767it's rolling release, not bleeding edgeand something as major as a full desktop environment update requires proper testing before pushing to users, especially when its the buggy piece of shit gnome we're talking about>>108466899>>108466918there is a megathread up right now to discuss this and basically everyone including the mod who made it is against verification
>>108466899That's archinstall guy
>>108466973>>108469067An arch dev asked the mods there to ban users for questioning ID verification, citing CoC violation
>>108467622>for some reason.Because by the time it makes it to RHEL it won't be beta.
>>108466767Debian and Fedora cannot compete with Arch on this unless you mean rawhide or sid + experimentalsee: https://repology.org/project/gnome-desktop/historyif you want the newest version on Arch: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Official_repositories#gnome-unstable
crunching the data using awk -F\t '{print $2}' tmp.txt | grep -v Project | tr \[:space:\] \n | sort | uniq -c | sort -n yeilds that Arch wins
>>108466767I find your impatient eagerness to install gnome on arch suspicious and concerning.
>>108469895Proof?
>>108466767Okay, but why would I want to use Gnome? It looks ugly to me.
>>108467252Yeah as opposed to getting raped, tortured and then murdered by the soviets. Your point?
>>108470042nta but i love the Soviets now
>>108470225hava nagilla my subhuman
>>108466899>Arch "We ban you if you spam the forums with a topic about which we told you we are still deliberating" LinuxBEYOND BASEDinstalling Arch this weekendentitled children can keep crying like the bitch cunts they are
>Ubuntu and Fedora have versions with GNOME 50 before Archthe absolute state
