If you're replaced by AI, your job was just a dull, rigid procedure, not essentially different from manual labor.
When is AI replacing the C-suite?
Sure, doesn't change the fact I'm unemployed and in the current system massive unemployment will be a problem
>>108467090the problem isn't unemployment but population, which is largely dead weight trash.
>>108467123stop posting unhinged nihilism cringe, please and thank you.
>>108467090Unemployed people wasting their time on the internet instead of looking for a job is the massive problem
>>108467138>t. dead weight trash(me too if its any comfort)
>>108467264You sound like a jewish doom merchant, sad!
>>108467203Prime bait lol
i remember marc andreesen saying in some interview that the only skill ai won't be able to replace is the unique intuitive judgement of the venture capitalist, lol
>>108468301is this picture shopped lol?
>>108467073It can literally make better decisions than some of these money-brained bozos. Shareholders and private equity will oust ceos for director models, or a human that abides completely by one’s directive. Would save a huge amount of money.
>>108467062Manual labor is the best and most fulfilling type of work unless it is some industrialized china-style factory work where you flip cups on a conveyor line for 10 hours a day.Our brains are made to like manual work since that's the kind of job that was required to survive. It's why a lot of people like things like fishing as a hobby despite seeming boring as fuck from the outside.
>>108468340No
>>108467062AI doesn't exist yet.
even before AI ive always been unemployed nobody in general would hire an unemployable 25 year old man not even lifting in a sweatshop warehouse
>>108467062sure. now what?
Why can't AI replace fastfood wagies? Wouldn't they have been the easiest to get rid of?
