[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1757508723455[1].jpg (52 KB, 800x542)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
How will pornography technology react to the increasing restrictions on distribution? Will this become underground? Back to magazines and physical media?
>>
>>108469849
I suspect they'll use these dang old evil torrents and they'll have to ban them to protect the kids
>>
I'm still using the same 2000s sites, it's like the rise and fall of streaming porn never happened for me.
>>
>>108469849
Just imagine pornography in your head
>>
>>108469849
Probably depends on the site. Some already have age gates that are the usual are you 18. The main site I use doesn't work unless you know how to access it correctly. So they probably not even have to do anything.
I've been archiving doujinshi I liked for years now just because. Who knew I was building something for future generations.
>>
I do not care about porn sites having to id users. But you don't id someone for the right to leave their house because they might stop at the pron shop.
>>
File: serious boi.jpg (113 KB, 511x749)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>108469849
Zoomers and millenials stopped showing up to the communal blackmail eyes wide shut type parties so the blackmail triads are trying to herd them by force into the Epstein island’s of tomorrow.
>>
>>108469849
They'll produce boudoir/gravure instead
>>
>>108469874
What sites? I can't even remember where I used to go for porn back in those days, I think I would just look up 'teen sluts' or some generic term and then follow links that looked good.
>>
>>108469860
tor
i2p
ipfs
ftp
gopher
>>
>>108469965
>implying you wouldn't be able to get nudes as a person who hasn't and from people who haven't submitted their ID through messaging
>>
File: 30_yos_then_vs_now.png (885 KB, 1562x1473)
885 KB
885 KB PNG
>>108469849
2 decades ago, this would've been flipped. With the green areas as red/blue and the red/blue areas as green. What happened to the West?
>>
>>108469849
Porn is readily available in the red countries
>>
>>108469849
Taiwan being based yet again. Burgers, Japs and Aussies better come to their aid when Xi comes knocking.
>>
>>108470178
NEWGROUNDS lol
I remember in the late 90s early 2000s I often got porn from p2p app called DC++ or something like that, and sometimes even from soulseek. But a lot of it actually came from CDs for gaming magazines I've been collecting. A lot of hentai there, etc. Mostly mild stuff though.
>>
>>108469892
If we go that far, y'all need to discover the concept of safehorny. There's a lot of it on youtube, in kid-rated videogames, etc. But imagination is still worth using even with all access in the world, it's just capable of much more than any premade content. I just think it goes best when you use it simultaneosly with content and "augment" it in your head.
>>
>>108469849
Pornography isn't restricted in India. Why lie?
>>
>>108470777
you telling me tiktok is banned but porn is allowed?
>>
>>108470777
thank you for updating us on Indian law, sir
>>
>>108470660
I still remember borrowing a harry potter game from my friend for ps1. It was porn, apparently his parents thought it was a good way to hide from him.
>>
>>108469849
>How will pornography technology react to the increasing restrictions on distribution?
Enough pornography has already been made to last mankind forever The usual response is some techological one, inn this case increased VPN usuage, in the interm at least.
>>108469849
>Will this become underground?
It's not a profitable industry any more. It's freeware
>>108469849
>Back to magazines and physical media?
No, they are too stigmatic and always were.
>>
>>108470777
GIven the amout of jeets that are found with child pornography it appears to be both endemic there and culturally accepted. There nees to be a UN convention on nuking India, evenryone all at once, a great coming together of teh US, Russia, UK, France and all the rest including North Korea, until every square inch of it is radioactive glass. Let this be our independence day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoLywiaM6PA
>>
>>108470831
my friend you only need to quote the post once
>>
>>108469849
>>
>>108470685
>If we go that far, y'all need to discover the concept of safehorny. There's a lot of it on youtube, in kid-rated videogames, etc
Ugh?
>>
i don't even want to see porn, glad it is being blocked from minors in my state
my concern is, though, that like a site like pornhub just doesn't want to deal with my state's restrictions so they just ban everyone and say fuck off no porn for you because you're from X. Could be a problem for coomers
>>
I just think it's funny that democrats are against id to vote but want to id you to install an operating system
>>
>>108469849
People will go back to using eDonkey which is arguably more dangerous, you can find animal/child porn on it without effort.
>>
>>108470948
Voter ID hurts them in elections. Digital ID helps them compile lists of children to rape. It's that simple.
>>
I can live without watching somebody fucking a whore do whatever
>>
>>108470948
I think a lot of them do the mental gymnastics that it'll curtail the 'bad' things about the internet (at least in their mind), the social harms that all the nice people from those suspiciously well funded charity organisations give them a presentation over a steak dinner.
>>
>>108471021
you're overthinking it
democrats were fine with minors on the internet when they controlled social media and could groom kids
the second they lost control of social media they immediately wanted to lock down the internet
>>
>>108471052
Honestly I think it's even more simple than that. They'll pass an incomprehensible jumble of laws, then attempt to sue Elon and force X to shut down. They're that petty.
>>
>>108470598
The original people are still here, they're just largely ignored. The only opinions that get any traction are those of women, faggots and fifth column foreigners.
>>
>>108470939
As the most classic example, there's a lot of "try-on haul" channels on youtube where women unpack/showcase cloth, often very hot. Sometimes even mini-skirts, underwear, bikini, etc.
In the kids games, look for characters in tights. They can be extremely hot and still not considered NSFW in any way.
And when they decide that this is also not okay, you're basically muslims at that point lmao.
>>
>>108470685
Safehorny is entirely the result of social media performative males who go 'step on me mommy, look I'm weak and submissive towards women, and find you attractive but not in a problematic way'
>>
>>108471124
They'll be cranking it to ankles.
>>
>>108471135
I don't see how "try-on haul" genre is the result of that, lol. I mean, women like to look hot and try clothes even when only other women are watching.
>>
I work in the industry. We just comply with age verification where it is required.

In a way it is even a good thing that AV is moved to the device level. It reduces a cost. We do not need to check every user. It is quite expensive.
>>
>>108470777
it's banned. i can't even see twitter posts of jp artists that i follow.
>>
>>108469849
porn should be banned

>>108470685
there is no such thing as safe horny
>>
File: 1748138454079444.jpg (55 KB, 911x1024)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>108469849
vibe gooning.
>>
>>108469849
I use a montenegro node to watch porn. The day my VPN sub runs out I am going to stop watching 3dpd porn in favor of hentai
>>
File: file.png (68 KB, 1370x292)
68 KB
68 KB PNG
>>108471195
that's a fantastic news. I am sad for you but happy in general. firefox is testing their free vpn. maybe you can do split tunneling for twitter. I do it using multi containers and http proxy with nordvpn so it's just gonna be easier for you once they release this for the entire world
>>
>>108469849
There's porn and softcore porn everywhere even on censored social media sites that have implemented age verification. There's always ways around it. It's like trying to block an opened floodgate with a couple of poles.
>>
File: sanjeet.jpg (51 KB, 512x512)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>108470913
>my friend
eh. no.
>>
>>108470797
Tiktok is banned because it's Chinese
>>108470859
India has nukes
>>
>>108469849
The world is going to shit.
Full totalitarianism is coming at full speed.
People always think they have the moral supremacy to tell others how to live their lives.
>>
>>108469892
Better yet, just draw your own hentai/r34
>>
>>108469849
>banning porn
Lol you cant do that. If your 12 yo son cant access porn on the internet then he is literally retarded.
>>
>>108471844
most kids today can barely use computers. teachers at schools are just blocking google and thats enough
>>
to keep them off the internet.
>>
>>108471623
Porn was not meant to be seen by minors, and if you give access to porn to minors and tell you did so to the police you will probably get in trouble in most if not all countries.

If you dont like this make a petition to make porn legally available to minors and see yourself how many people you can find that agree with this.
>>
>>108471919
I would honestly say porn should be made legal for 14 year olds. Anyone above 14 with above average IQ already watched porn already.
>>
>>108471919
Ah I've been struggling with this one for a while. I simply don't understand why porn should even be illegal for teens for example. I started beating it around 12, I had free access to porn, it was nice. Wouldn't be so nice if everything was blocked. In the past there were at least paper magazines, comics, books, etc, for this, but nowadays it's all mostly internet. I genuinely don't know how teens dealt with this even before magazines, but I have a suspicion that in those times it wasn't uncommon to get pregnant when you're like 13.
>>
>>108471890
Sad
>>
>>108471941
>>108471942
As far as i know lagally pornography is only when sexual intercourse is depicted.
The exact definition can be slightly different depending on the country of course.

However sexy girls and boys covering the genital parts are usually not considered pornography, yet minors have no problem to satisfy themselves looking at this kind of content.
>>
File: 1772394327211_8219.png (278 KB, 1400x850)
278 KB
278 KB PNG
>>108471979
>minors have no problem to satisfy themselves looking at this kind of content
Anyone can, not just minors. If you can't, you're probably having your T levels declining.
>>
>>108469849
>Germany
>age verification
uh, no? we have softcore porn playing on various tv-channels at night and going onto literally any pornsite is not prompting me to verify my age aside from checking the "ye I'm old lemme fap" checkboxes. where is that map's data even coming from?
>>
Give me a good reason on why porn should be banned. You can't, you don't have one. The crap with protecting minors is ridiculous and makes my blood boil. First, fuck your kids. No one cares about them, except you. Educate them about online content, supervise their access, and if they do access nasty stuff, well, I guess you should.. parent them? It's your home, your rules, and your internet connection.
But don't pass on the rest of society the burden of educating your kids not to beat it to latina or jav videos, and don't punish me and the rest of sane men and women for wanting to jerk off.
In other words, to make sure that even you prudish retards understand: your kids are your business, leave porn in place for consenting adults to enjoy. And fuck you.
>>
>>108472002
I am ok, was refering to the concern of taking porn away from minors in this post >>108471942
>>
There are cuckolds out there who want to see other men have sex on video. Let that sink in.
>>
>>108470941
>don't even want to see porn
>glad it is being blocked from minors in my state
I fail to see a connection here.
>>
>>108471919
The permitions and capabilities are the same as before. YOU are advocating for a totalitarian change because YOU hate freedom. I don't need to petition to change something that was fine to begin with
>>
>>108471919
You are creating an equivalency of "something being illegal" and "totalitarian enforcement being justified to enforce it". You are actually a threat to any free country and any constitution.

>>108472084
- samefag, sorry for double response.
>>
>>108472027
Not to mention that the retarded logic that created the "ban porn to protect the kids" can be extended to other similarly retarded arguments: let's take down all the sites and mentions referencing violent crimes such as murders. Let's ban youtube because it has thousands of documentaries about serial killers. What if your kid randomly finds one while browsing yt, won't be affected for life? It definitely can, and much more than watching a blonde hottie getting fucked doggystyle.
Let's ban books, especially those mentioning sex. Let's censor all the movies involving sex scenes, God knows one teen might watch it and imitate what he saw..
Let's ban, ban, ban. Just because you stupid lawmakers and shitty parents are low-iq and unable to educate your kids.
>>
>>108472084
I never advocated for a totalitarian change and i appreciate freedom.

You seem pretty mad, what would be the outcome if you did this 2 things in your country?

> Police catches you giving minors access to porn
> You ask random people if they think porn should be legally available to minors
>>
>>108469849
Paid will take a huge hit as normgroids get locked out via ID checks on their phone. Piracy will be fine for at least another few years.
>>
>>108472131
Giving random minors access to porn is probably illegal. Doing it as parent is probably legal.
They won't think it should it should be legal.

They also hopefully don't support establishing full totalitarianism to enforce it. This is not a system anyone actually wants to grow up in.

You are one of the most dangerous people walking alive on this planet. And you will never face procecution.
>>
>>108472095
>>108472161
In reality i am more inclined to not having any age verification, but in a democracy a single person like me would not be able to change something if not at least 50% of the remaining population agrees.

I highly doubt that the law is different depending if you are a parent or not, but of course i dont know the law of your country, it could be very different to my country.
>>
>>108472244
Sorry, that's not how democracy works nowadays.
>>
>>108472264
You want to tell me that i decide for everybody?

Asking because i was just called one of the most dangerous people walking alive on this planet.
>>
Guess I'll have to fuck my wife
>>
>>108472368
Me too. When is she available?
>>
>>108472347
No. Whatever you decide or the 99% manority decides does not affect the actions that those in power take.
>>
>>108472482
This is not really true.
However since you seem to believe this, what makes me then one of the most dangerous people walking alive on this planet?
>>
>>108472540
I don't know, it was a different anon
>>
>>108472629
Strange that you felt the need to answer then.
>>
>>108469849
>sweden
porn isn't restricted here wtf
this may be a shithole country with dogshit laws but at least porn doesn't have any restrictions (yet)
>>
>>108472698
Just being polite
>>
>>108472896
Swedish feminists are deranged, have banned prostitution and tried to limit porn purchases (even by law) but yeah those consuming it for free still have some rights. But they're probably the next target and they'll start with age verification the coming years
>>
>>108469849
Porn is banned in China? Reaaaaaaally? Coulda fooled me
>>
>>108470859
That's sounds good to me, but you'll need to hit China with a half dozen nukes at least in order for me to accept this deal
>>
>>108471919
Witnessing sex is not the problem, that's just nature.
Degenerate sex is the problem. An no, kids should not see that shit
>>
>>108469849
I have the feeling that OS-side age verification will become the standard. Not only are all age verification services too annoying for the average person they're a privacy nightmare that some governments are going to raise a stink about (nevermind that the OS is the one collecting your age data...)
Best case scenario, filling a form with a false age will be enough. Worst case, you're going to have to send your ID to some centralized service.

And VPNs will become incresingly common as some sites will simply start hosting on places without those laws.
It's the normification of the internet, they joined, saw things they didn't like and now they're trying to curtail or ban it.
>>
File: 1681062226197253.jpg (3.08 MB, 2976x2163)
3.08 MB
3.08 MB JPG
>>108470598
It took on a propaganda character.
needs the hard link to id to better leverage your animal desires against you
>>
>>108470598
>What happened to the West?
Pedo elites need to keep an eye on us, to protect children from the pedo elites, somehow it's supposed to make sense.
>>
>>108471979
Sure, but it's nonsensical to ban porn for teens while fully realizing they gonna beat it to softcore. I mean, the moment you realize teen do masturbate it stops making sense to ban porn. Which raises important question: how politicians can be so dumb to not even think about it for a second.
>>
>>108472021
I think currently it mostly impacts big social media. For example, NSFW posts on X now require verification if you browse from EU, but change VPN server to something outside and it's ok. This is the reason I stopped using EU servers on my VPN recently.
>>
Wasn't the mainstream porn industry basically dead already anyway on account of onlyfans and like, twitter
>>
>>108476947
Those sites are the new mainstream and other than certain themes and styles getting more and more censored the porn has gotten much better than before. More regular good looking women involved. Better sound/video quality. Easy to access. Ability to tailor your own porn.
>>
>>108469898
>>
>>108469849
Wait, are they actually banning porn in germany?
So far it is just a tickbox.
This is just a tax on the poor who can't afford a VPN.
>>
>>108469849
Fuck you got mine. I didn't datahoard for shits and giggles you faggots.
>>
It gets weirder in some countries, where you can have sex for real at 16 but not look at a video of it until 18.
>>
>>108469849
>Poland
>Testing age-verification
What?
>>
>>108475436
There are countries where it is prohibited for minors to watch pornography.
Beating it to softcore is not a problem there.

In other words they dont ban porn for minors because it was alraedy banned to begin with. What they do is that they enforce this ban better for online services.

At least in the country i am living that would be the case.
Maybe you should check the laws of your country regarding the consumption of porn.
I researched a bit for my country recently and i learned some surprising things i did not know about this, even affecting adults.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.