https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe-dEE_wzyAHow COOL is that???
>>108475656Imagine robot imams and cyber Islam. Fucking based. Albeit, we still have plenty of young Muslims, so it's not needed, but would still be cool.I am hesitant about that monk running chatgpt, though
>>108475656A machine for prayer?!
>>108475656Of course it's a Unitree robot
>>108475714Japan is still in the stone age. Please be understanding.
>>108475656Robots cannot administer valid Sacraments.
>>108475727Robots can be programmed to be the ideologically purest expressions of religion. Their sacrament would then be the most valid.
>>108475727>The Pope declares that robots can administer valid sacraments because blah blah>Ackshually robots CAN administer sacraments and this has always been the position of the Catholic Church
>>108475656I think that it Buddhism is a joke so it seems about right
>>108475747>coulda woulda shouldaAnd God could have created the world differently, but He didn't.>>108475783The Pope can't go against Tradition or Magisterium. It's why they still haven't been able to ban TLM despite all their efforts, which are much more effortful than the novelty joke of ordaining clankers.
>>108475851>The Pope can't go against Tradition or Magisterium.Yes they can. Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is no longer taught. The Catechism states that Muslims can be saved, and this is published by the bishops worldwide as a standard teaching apparatus, which renders it infallible as it constitutes an act of the Ordinary Magisterium. Of course this contradicts historical teaching, which invalidates Catholicism completely.
>>108475894>no longer taughtWhat is or isn't taught is pastoral decision, it doesn't make the teaching false. I'm pretty sure many things were taught that aren't anymore and that doesn't make the old teaching false. Now whether or not it was the right call to stop teaching Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus... is not our call to make.>Muslims can be savedAnyone can be saved. They just have to accept Our Lord Jesus Christ. A pre-colombian injun could be saved despite never hearing the good news in his life, when in the event of his death he converted. Invincible ignorance. I'm pretty sure the modern satanist world is pretty damn invincible to most people, sadly some clergymen included.
>>108475921>is not our call to makeWell you got that part right at least. You have no say in any of it and regardless of whether you think it's wrong it's your duty to accept it. So if they allow robots to administer sacraments, as you said, it's not your call to make. Saying it can't happen is meaningless because if it does you'll have to accept it regardless.
>>108475727That's Christian problems.
>>108475921Also I think you're deflecting on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. Unam Sanctam (1302) states:>Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.The modern Catholic Church teaches that Protestant churches function as means of salvation, meaning that being subject to the Pope is not necessary anymore. But I guess there are ways to weasel around the terms "absolutely necessary" and "every human creature", despite those being as clear as possible, right?
>>108475894You're wrong. The muslims can be saved stuff was an interpretation over semi ambiguous words. There's no ambiguity about who can deliver a sacrament, it must be a human. If the Pope decided via ex cathedra that toasters can deliver sacrament then the bishops have means to retract it.
>>108475934>So if they allow robots to administerBut they can't. It's not meaningless. It's like saying "if God floods the Earth again", it won't happen. It can't happen. He promised He won't, therefore it won't happen. Period.>>108475957I didn't read the whole document, but your post seems to imply pre-colombian injuns were hellbound with no hope of Salvation. I'm pretty that was never true.
>>108475957>But I guess there are ways to weasel around the terms "absolutely necessary" and "every human creature", despite those being as clear as possible, right?You know, I'll do it for you. You can say:>Since a person is baptized that makes them the subject of the Pope regardless of whether they accept or reject the Pope, so therefore you can reject the authority of the Pope completely and utterly and yet still be his subject and thus be saved.This of course makes Unam Sanctam nonsensical since there would be no reason to even state this, but by Talmudic semantics you can solve any problem.
>>108475656Is there anything Fallout failed to predict?
>>108475977>therefore it won't happen. Period.Sure it can. The Pope can grant some special dispensation for Sacraments to be administered by a delegated robot substitute that has been blessed by a priest. If he did that what would you do? You'd just say it was correct and forget you ever argued against it.>I didn't read the whole document, but your post seems to imply pre-colombian injuns were hellbound with no hope of Salvation. I'm pretty that was never true.What does "every human creature" mean? I know, we can say that their existence at the time was not known as thus they do not count as humans in the context of the document. No matter how clear a definition is you can get around it if you try hard enough.
>>108476000No he can't. You're clearly a dumbass using words in latin the way the left uses scientific words to sound smarter. You don't understand anything.
>>108476000this retarded nigger probably thinks the pope could claim that jesus didn't exist btw
>>108475977>It's like saying "if God floods the Earth again", it won't happen. It can't happen. He promised He won't, therefore it won't happen. Period.If you described the current state of the Church to any Catholic before the 1900s they would tell you the same thing.
>>108476011>>108476017>Well you're just stupid and a niggerI accept your confession of defeat
>>108476022inb4 before you say that everything I said was wrong because I typed confession instead of concession
so how does one become a monk?is there like an overseas program or something
>>108475656that which doesn't exist has nothing left to erase.funily enough those robots may be more enlightened than the monks as they do not have a self or qualia.
>>108476177look it up and you'll realize why there's fewer and fewer monksthere's documentaries too in youtube too
>>108476290ai has (is?) a projection of humanity's qualia by definition
>>108476177Join a church and talk to your priest about it rather than asking on an anime porn forum.
>>108476326it is a projection but doesn't have a qualia of its own, it's not conscious, like all projections.
>>108475656To WORSHIP?Might as well close the damn temple.
