Nowhere. Because: it's not. Technology is strictly a band-aid solution to external disruptions to the bio-ecologically natural state of human beings.

>>108478693
It's easy to make shittier software faster, anon.
The whole point is that middle management doesn't give a fuck and only wants features for their salesmen to sell, and band-aids for their customers' complaints.
This has been a constant forever and will only get worse now with LLMs, for both users and programmers.

making a good gui app is hard, it basically becomes spagatti, always

File: le kill yourself face.png (421 KB, 864x766)

421 KB PNG

>software
>good

any moment now

>>108478693
Good software is easy to make if you have funding. Guess which market imploded over the last weeks?

1. devs in the industry make things more complicated than they need to be on purpose to keep their job
2. tech companies are prone to feature creep because it's more impressive to normies to announce a shiny new feature than fixing bugs and refining
3. indians
4. vibecoding
5. webshit is an easier platform target than native
6. politics and ego within the organization of the project
7. technical debt and legacy systems

>>108480048
What about open source hobbyists? We used to have so much good quality hobby software.

>>108480310
Open source is still affected by 3, 6, 7 and indirectly by the rest.

>>108478693
Good software exists, but it's ignored for shiny trend software

>>108480433
You forgot the fourth

>>108478693
>it's so easy to make good software now
Says who?

>>108480310
https://github.com/LinuxBeaver/

>>108482185
Did you lose Bruce3434?