>goyim actually believe this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHrZRJR4igQ

>>108480614
the mark of the beast will be even easier, and is mostly painless

File: e.png (1.52 MB, 881x1306)

1.52 MB PNG

>>108480614
>verifying your age on every single website
Ooh. Use case?

I mean if the option is just a website pulling from whatever I told part of my OS vs the website taking my fucking ID and face-scan and blood sample then yeah, you're right.
The idea is that ANY age-verification is an overreach though.

>>108480658
yeah bro, free money, ai robot servants doing everything, it will be the life... also they'll be able to torture you inside your mind for what will feel like 1000 years in just a single day but they'll only do that to those who commit wrongthink... and also just some unlucky people maybe everyone idk
what could possibly go wrong?

>>108480678
>The idea is that ANY age-verification is an overreach though.

Guess what world we live in? One in which age verification exists already.

You're going to like OS-level AV. It's a net improvement on the current way things are done.

>>108480614
>will actually be more privacy friendly than verifying your age on every single website
neither should exist
parents should be watching their kids, I shouldn't be forced to show my face to my OS and every website because some deadbeat parents can't watch their kids

>>108480614
This would be true if it's just setting an age that requires root access or a parental controls password to modify. So I'm not necessarily against it on Linux in its current form. But you know what they really want is for everyone to submit all their info to a Palantir-associated company to set it.

>>108481203
It all started with pornhub

>>108480614
what if we just dont do age verification anywhere and go back to the ways of the old internet? you know, thats kind of the whole point of being on 4chan.

>>108480614
Honestly I'm optimistic they'll just have an easy to spoof system that no one will really care about once its all said and done since 99.9% of goyim will be using devices that aren't linux.
>Literally just "what is your date of birth?" box that you can lie about, the exact same shit as when any distro asks you for your name during install and you just lie
>Token based system where one valid token from a fake ID will just be spread amongst users of the distro
>""more sophisticaed"" system where everyone will just spoof their own tokens one time using AI generated images and fake AI generated IDs

This shit never works out, Linux is too open for age verification to be the boogeyman people are making it out to be.

>>108483036
4chan does age verification

>>108483375
i have never been asked my birthday here before.

>>108480614
If it's based on zero knowledge proof which is able to be certified by neutral third parties such as a library, sure. It would actually improve the net in some ways. Anything else is 1984 though.

>>108483375
>>108483404
Both of you Africans stfu.
This is our super sekret club and it needs to stay that way. Think before you post

>>108480614
A major problem with OS level verification is that different governments are asking for different verification standards.

California accepts self-declaration by users that they are +18, and will let your OS get a "I am +18" badge for that.

Brazil rejects self self-declaration; you need to show government ID or do a biometric face scan.

Granted, in these two examples (and potential EU laws), it is claimed that the personal information shall get deleted from databases as soon as verification is complete. You will have to take this on faith. Microslop automatically links OS encryption keys to cloud-based identities for whoever gives in to their mandatory email sign-ins.

Even if you live in a 'democracy' that is not explicitly authoritarian, you trust your government will not leverage this in their casually unleashed AI-powered mass spyware? That corpos won't mass harvest your personal information for profit (Windows Recall is designed to take a screenshot of your system every few seconds so an AI can build a personal profile of you)? Will database leaks and critical vulnerabilities stop happening?

This sets up the building blocks for a segregated internet, and your OS verification is effectively a digital passport mandated by the government. if you are verified websites work, if you are not verified major websites are inaccessible or restricted. This makes censorship tools far more powerful, and moves it from the website level directly into the operating system itself.

>>108480658
god isn't real

>>108480614
>2 sheckels have been deposited
may you suffer.

>>108484472
jew here and im against this shit. stop making everything about the jews.

>>108480614
Using age signals is a great idea that is infinitely more privacy-friendly than any other alternative. You, an adult, buy a device, you, an adult, set up the accounts, those accounts send appropriate signals allowing or disallowing adult content, there's no need to "verify" anything, privacy is absolute.
"Age verification" as mandated by the Brazilian government or by Applel in the UK is just another name for id verification. It's only marginally more privacy-friendly than verifying your id on every website as long as you trust your os not to disclose your identity.

Age signals are something we should defend. "Age verification" is a vague promise to make us comply. They're not remotely similar. You often see the terms used indistinctly because bad actors like Facebook are spending millions of dollars trying to force a digital id to actually identify every user online. If proper, anonymous age signals were adopted, their plan would get ruined. That's why they spam every corner of internet trying to convince everyone that they're the same thing.
It may sound counter-intuitive, but even highly negative posts benefit them. If pro-privacy people rejected "age verification" but embraced age signals, they'd have a problem. If they convince everyone that "age verification" and age signals are one and the same it doesn't matter if pro-privacy people oppose it, because there won't be an alternative, so it'll still be easier for them to push an actual id verification.

Fuck age verification. And fuck (those) who pretend age verification and age signals are the same.

>>108483444
The internet is serious business.

>>108485752
what is the differance between age signals and parental control?

>>108480614
Absolute cope.
Kill yourself shill.

Identity theft galore >:)

>>108485954
Literally only the way they're presented to the user. I absolutely support anyone who defends that parental controls are enough, but I still think that at this point age signals are a much better solution because they're "deliberate."
Let me explain myself, parental controls aren't considered a solution because most people don't use them. Average retard buys a phone for his retarded kid, he doesn't set up the parental controls because he's a retard, then he blames everyone but himself because his retarded son spends the day looking at porn. When you force that retard to tell if the account is for him or for his retarded son, it's completely on him. He can't just say that he forgot to set up the parental controls. He becomes accountable.

lf you ask me, those retards should have always been accountable, but when you allow retardation for too long it's extremely hard to revert it just by telling people they need to stop being retards. And out of all the possible alternatives, forcing people to tell if the accounts on their devices are for adults or for children is the less invasive system I can think of to actually force retarded parents to do their fucking job.

1. I will never use a linux OS that has age verification

2. If distro maintainers are such little coward worms that theyll comply instead of moving theirs hosts to Russia then they deserve to fall.

Its official the west has no freedom now

>>108480614
are you a retard?

File: 1753288750053469.jpg (35 KB, 771x398)

35 KB JPG

>>108480614
>glowniggers aren't even trying anymore
Embarrassing.