i literally just copy the folders directly onto the external SSD. i suppose i could zip em but the time it takes to compress is the time it takes to copy em over.when i do it the next time i delete the old backup and then transfer it againi am the king of inefficiency
>>108494042tar -czf /mnt/backup/linux-isos.tar.gz /home/op/linux-isos
tar -czf /mnt/backup/linux-isos.tar.gz /home/op/linux-isos
>>108494092what good does a tar do for offline use? t. dumb
>>108494384smaller, easier to move around, less mutable
>>108494577well ty
What you're doing is probably good if you have the space. If some kind of archive gets corrupted, you lose everything. If one file gets corrupted, you lose one file.
>>108495780if a corrupted file can threaten your backup, what you have is something other than a backup.
>>108495812right? so OP shouldn't be zipping his backups then?
>>108494092Yoooo this nigga still archiving to tapes.
>>108495812unitedstatian education moment
>>108495831just use a filesystem with built in compression for your backupyou could even ratchet up the compression level and it's all transparent.
>>108494042I generally do zfs send incremental and i also use restrict to have a cloud backup on top for the most important stuff.
>>108495831if any file being corrupted is a risk to your backup, you don't have a backup. doesn't matter whether you zip it or not.a proper backup does not care whether any files anywhere are being corrupted or not.