[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: mizuki.png (644 KB, 1310x786)
644 KB
644 KB PNG
Why do shitty slop Linux distributions garner so much attention? Ubuntu-slop distros in particular. Shit like Zorin OS, who the fuck is it made for? "new users", as if there is any person who cannot use the a fucking computer unless it has a retarded ass GNOME theme which is designed to specifically mimic Windows 7. If I wanted a Linux to run Linux but also be copying the layout of an out-of-date version of another operating system, I'd run Red Star OS. Or Pop!_OS (stupid name btw), which ships out broken software, is recommended endlessly for including proprietary NVIDIA drivers in the .ISO file. Elementary OS, which is designed has some weird, ugly, iOS 6/Mac OS X Mavericks imitation aesthetic being enforced. And god fucking forbid KDE Neon. This shit is why Windows will never die, no matter how cripplingly unusable, slow, and expensive it becomes. If someone becomes interested in Linux, that is the kind of shit that gets thrown at them, that and Ubuntu itself which shoves advertisements in the fucking terminal. But instead of people being directed to an actual good, usable, friendly distribution (pic related), they are instead fed slop and then blamed for having a terrible experience.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.