>drop 99.9999% software compatibility in the desperate chase for battery efficiency>alienate all professional customers>alienate all developers>cheat with hardware accelerators in web browsing to make up for ARM being total shit in real workloads>get utterly destroyed in battery life anyway 3 years later by intlelARM is dead.
>>108520683I thought arm is good for work no?
>>108520689lollmao even
>>108520689>you can run 12 apps>good for workhow do you define work? editing a spreadsheet? you can do that on a 20 year old thinkpad.
>>108520683Show single core performance comparison.
>>108520683Just reminder that $2.5k intel laptop started lagging during basic web browser test, couldn't even keep up with basic m5 air LMAO.
>>108520693Listen bro aside from an iphone and an ipad (two hand me downs) I don't use apple products, but there's no way all those benchmarks I see online are bullshit I'm not buying the fact my 9800x3d is better than the m5
>>108520700Like, adobe, coding etc ? I don't really care for laptops, desktop only kinda guy
>>108520714>>108520721so easy to trigger ijeetsjust show them real life benchmarks
>>108520728I'm not trigged,as I said I never bought an apple product, I just don't understand the hype if what you saying is true
>>108520714I call bullshit
>>108520711>Show single core performance comparison.
>108520711if a program only needs a single core, it's not performance intensive in the first placeanything that actually needs performance will be multicoreoh, your currynigger silicon gets destroyed in multicore by everything? too badget a toilet currynigger
>>108520735Lol you are arguing with brown person.He didn't post the video of his 40 hour benchmark, because in the same video when they opened VOLVO website on $1k m5 air, and $2.5k dell intel laptop it started lagging.time stamped it for you.https://youtu.be/YgnVgVYOqbo?t=952
>>108520743No watch the video ---> >>108520759that's where OP took his 40 hours benchmark lmao.he didn't post the link for a reason, kek.
>>108520759It's not timeatped, can you tell me the time ?
>>10852077615:00
>>108520784I see, listen It's pretty bad ngl How does it compare to desktop tho,I don't really use laptopsMy rig is 9800x3d, 9070xt and 32 GB ddr5, how does it compare to Mac studio
>>108520711In Geekbench, right?
>>108520800Or Mac mini , the desktop Mac
>>108520759>on mac you can select all the files and open them all at once>on windows i have to go back and open them one at a timeWhat the fuck? You can select and open multiple files at once on Windows.
>>108520800I think the m5 18 core pro/max share the cpu cores now they only have additional GPU cores. (20gpu cores in Mac mini pro and 40 gpu).Basically, m5 Mac Studio/Mac mini Pro is faster in single core performance and eats much less power. I think it's like. 14-20W total cpu/gpu if you are watching 4k vid on YouTube, but your computer is better for gaming if you care about that.>>108520825I am currently running 5600x/amd 6800 gpu hackintosh Tahoe, I prefer it over windows and linux.Feels like linux that just works.
>>108520806GCC default linker? Anything.
>>108520852Mostly gaming and coding Btw can I use this on my PC ?
>>108520683>chrome web browsingshould have tested safari.>youtube video watchingwow, a productivity monster>test gaming, which is harder to manipulate and the mac wins.>>108520693bro, no macos user needs to compile the fucking linux kernel. there's no point to these (wrong) stats.
>>108520870Your CPU is fine, but your gpu is not supported.Last supported graphics card is the amd 2, I think 6950 is the most powerful one.Regardless this is last Intel Mac version, if you want to fuck around with macOS just get cheapest m5 mini, you can run bunch of LLM's on it too if you buy one that has enough RAM or turn it into server since they have such a low TDP, I think it's 4w idle.
>>108520887Wow that sucks, btw why no more updates?Also I'll probably will, I just hope it won't be expensive
>>108520852> Feels like linux that just worksWeird. I thought hackintoshers were extremely arrogant elitist and retarded people.Btw, how hard is it to make ryzen CPU run hackintosh? You say it just works, but...
>>108520908> how hard is it to make ryzen CPU run hackintoshAsk your local llm
>>108520900Basically, amd2 series was last AMD card they actually sold with Mac, I think it was in Mac Pro 2019 before their ARM cpu/gpu venture, and they are fully switching into ARM so they don't care about supporting older Intel Macs they don't produce anymore.But you have gaming pc, basically just buy cheapest Mac mini if you want to fuck around macOS, you don't need to game on it, so the extra GPU cores are worthless.>>108520908I been running hackintosh since Mojave, not hard for me, but it depends on your 'puter skills.
>>108520953You made me feel better, btw how much ram do I need for a Mac? 16 is enough?;
>>108520967Depends what kind of workflow you have, do you want to run LLM on it? I'd say 16/24 is fine for basic shit. 48/64+ if you want to use it as LLM machine, but I am not expert on their ARM cpus.
>>108521016Okay,ty bro
>>108520953> I been running hackintosh since MojaveI actually did Catalina hackintosh on my laptop once. But ended up selling it. Did it in a monkey see-money do way. And I know that people usually pick specific hardware for hackintosh, instead of extra bullshitting with driver support.>>108520996We are actually talking about using Apple's software without a loicense. Which side are you on? Pakistan, I assume...
>>108520683I'm all for total ARM death including revival of x86 smartphones that do more than play angry birds but don't stoop down to macfag fear mongering and present unfair tests like these.>Notebookcheck's Wi-Fi battery test simulates realistic web browsing to measure laptop endurance.>The test runs an automated script (HTML5, JavaScript) that cycles through a mix of websites every 30 seconds.>Key parameters include setting display brightness to ~150 cd/m2>using a balanced power profile, and continuous active Wi-Fi browsing.https://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-XPS-14-2026-review-Fully-reborn-with-Intel-Panther-Lake-X7.1218670.0.htmlThis is still dangerous to ARM as it promised more than 15 hours of battery life, which x86 can do now. Even better this is being done with a fucking 1800p 120Hz OLED display which used to tank battery life down to just 10 hours or less. So very efficient x86 + very efficient OLED display combo here dunking hard on miniLED fagbooks with heavy screen ghosting.
I really think the OLED part isn't being sold enough, ~17 fucking hours with less than 1 millisecond of GtG display response time is wild man.
>>108521050>120Hz screenrunning at 1Hz.
>>108521065Not in the notebookcheckreview test.>WLAN runtime lasts for almost 17 hours when on Balanced mode which is very close to what we recorded on the similarly-equipped ExpertBook Ultra. However, note that Windows VRR is not automatically enabled for a default fixed refresh rate of 120 Hz; manually enabling this would drop the refresh rate to just 20 Hz when static for potentially longer runtimes.
>>108521094would love to see what the xps is like unhandicapped
>>108520683> 70 hours of Chrome web browsingsounds like bullshit to me
>>108520759>you are arguing with brown person
>>108520852not a mac
>>108520683it's crazy how so many people still haven't realized that the strength of x86 is the infinite backward compatibility and open firmware interface (bios/uefi)arm will never be taken seriously as long as they don't standardize the firmware interface and have seriously backward compatibility.they realized that for armv8 and now do backward compatbility but it's barely gaining any traction because the platform is still absolutely awful to support, every vendor is reinventing the wheel with their own gotchas and heaps of bugs, it's a fucking nightmare.performance or efficiency are not worth it, cortex-a-based computers need to be eradicated, mac included, they're a net negative for humanity>>108520689it's fine for browsing mails and linkedin, you won't find mac in ATM or cash register, mac are mostly for worthless jobs like designers or marketing, we have generative software to replace these people now, mac just lost their only reason to exist in the prosumer space.
>>108521473Nobody needs more than 8 hours of battery>BUT I WORK 12 HOURS A DAYYou're a corpo slave>BUT I HATE BEING PLUGGED IN!Grow up
>>108520683when intel called apple a lifestyle brand, intel wasn't going to accept being humiliated by apple like that.intel might have periods of retardation but they always snap back and go for the throats of their competitors.see the pentium 4 and intel curb stomping amd into the ground all the way until amd's stock dropped to a $1 a share and virtually almost bankrupt in 2015.apple will regret ditching intel for good.>lol intel sucks, you coping ahahahah HABHJSHAHDyeah, i know, you are a homosexual. but you will get aids from all that cock sucking.
>>108521477just say you're poor
it's another mac schizo thread.
>>108521473>the strength of x86 is the infinite backward compatibility and open firmware interfaceAnd also an NSA micro operating system in the CPU itself to conviniently spy on you without letting you know.
Still buying a macbook pro
>>108520721Why would a 9800x3d being faster than m5 be weird? What kind of curry nigger are you?
>>108521511>AMD/INTEL/APPLEAll have development centres in PissrahellFor sure CPUs from these companies are back-doored by Gayssad, without a doubt.If you want kike free cpu, you have to buy Huawei ARM laptop from china, they have their own operating system + cpu/gpu I think it's 6nm though, ofc. all your data go to Chinese agencies instead (better option, weaker performance).
>>108520683Do apple silicon chips even have dedicated video decoding hardware?
>>108520683Applecels on suicide watch
>>108520683>slower>more expensive>2h battery life under heavy loadlmao x86 is doa
>>108521274>sounds like bullshit to me
>>108520683That is massive, if true.How is it so much more efficient with bloated windows?
>>108521538Because it's more expensive so it must be better
>>108520683>HDR offWhy the hell would you want to turn on HDR on windows when watching sdr content??? It doesn't give you 2.2/bt.1886(aka 2.4) gamma emulation settings and instead uses its own shit tier eotf so bad whoever the fuck is responsible deserves the death penalty since HDR makes SDR content vandalized>what is the usec-Fuck off epussy, your shitty redhat anti white racist software couldn't vsync properly to the display refresh rate and was blocked at 60hz until 2019 and didn't stop stuttering until years after, you're the firefox of linux
>>108523547vandalized on windows*
>>108523204have you seen the state of curryjeetOS?
