Getting anything in the air us more expensive than on the ground. Pretty much the only expensive tech that makes sense is military radar or other dumb stuff. What are you going to do? Double sided tape a tablet to the bathroom wall?
buy an ad linus, we're not going to give you content ideas
>>108521514No he's a greedy jew and a retard for thinking you can techify an airplane. Everything needs to be certified by the government to fly in the air.
>>108521510The last thing you should put is anything modern. The less likely someone can access your stuff from outside the plane.
>>108521510>how would you tech-ify an airplane?I wouldn't. Give me a WW2 era plane any day over a computer with wings. I love tech but not when it comes to keeping me in the air. t. Dad flies a 1944 Douglas C-47 Skytrain (not the civ DC-3 version), grandpa owned and flew it before him and I pretty much grew up in that thing.
>>108521510look at air force one, the thing is just a flying server room
modern engines and unleaded gas would be nice for general aviationand throw in a pegasus and party balloons too
Airplanes are already tech. That thing is covered in sensors connected to a computer running GNC algorithms and gathering telemetry.
>>108521510"gook force one" painted on the side
