I used to trust open source software more because being public, issues would surface and be identified more easily under the eyes of many.But now with LLMs, between everyone publishing their vibeslop and maintainers not even reading what they're pushing, I am less inclined to download open source software.Is this what (((they))) wanted?
thats how its always beenunless youre auditing the code yourself, youre relying on trust just as much as proprietary software
>>108522678Always has been, anon.I'd say this is probably an improvement actually, the retarded code monkeys can feed their code into LLMs and say "find bugs" and easily fix catastrophic issues in an hour instead of waiting for it to fuck up enough people's computers that someone finally files a bug report and then 8 months later the developer accepts the pull request written 7 months and three weeks ago that fixes it.
>>108522678kek no. linux was compromised and had a backdoor running for 7 YEARS that nobody spotted because nobody is looking at all the code, everyone just presumes someone else is.
>>108522678do you seriously believe that corporate software isnt being vibe coded as we speakdo you even work as a dev? do you even know anyone irl who works as a dev?the decay youre seeing is universal
>>108522678Positive side of things: you can do your own software. Custom one. You do not need someone else to do it for you. No reason to trust anyone.
>>108523378> had a backdoor running for 7 YEARS Which one? Be more specific, it's not like it happened once.
>>108522678Cope Luddite. AI WON, CODERS LOSTAI is the present and the future and all coders will be replaced
>>108522678A local llm can read a whole repo in less than a minute, give it 60 reads and see if it finds sentence anything sus.
>>108524661
