>H.264 license fee surgeWill this affect 4chan?
i'm trans btw
There are fees to streaming with some specific codec? What?
>>108523259IDL what any of this meansGive me a rundown chat
>>108523259Rentmaxxing
>>108523259why did you make a new thread when the old one is still alive?
>>108523470The av1 shill was blown the fuck out last thread so he needed a clean slate.
>>108523303this is why 4chinz is acoustic about free as in freedom codecs such as vp8, vp9 or av1.
>>108523318literally pic related
>>108523259>unintentionally speeds up the adoption of royalty free codecsLOL good job retards. Meanwhile VVC is aborted in the womb in favor of AV1 because literally nobody trusts MPEG enough to make hardware decoders for it, or any of their new patented codecs for that matter. It's funny watching them pull desperate shit like this.
>>108523259I don't get it. Can't they just use x264/x265 to avoid the licensing fees? IIRC the patent fuckery only applies to H264/H265.
h264 base and main patents already expired. These guys are just squeezing the last drops out of the reminding irrelevant patents for the few years left, they’ll go after the semi big fish which will worth millions of dollars worth of lawsuit
>>108523259>someone makes H.266problem solved
>>108523558Or the fact vendors have to now disable hardware encoders in some markets because of it.
>>108523293May the rope find you soon.
>>108523558There are no royalty free codecs. There are only royalty codecs and codecs that have yet to be claimed as royalty and will be claimed under royalty in the coming future
