>if AGI is ever achieved, it will be in the hands of giant corporations We failed to make the Internet free. Will AI be the same?
>>108525056AGI converges to a cute maid with huge boobs. It doesn't matter who makes it, this is what it will turn into.
>>108525056I will leak the weights, dont worry
>>108525056idk food isn't grown by yourself anymore and it's pretty good. you can pay a little more for better food, so if you want the better agi it'll just cost more. not sure what you expect, it's not like you're running your own telco backbone for the internet either.
>>108525082Thanks for saving the world, anonymous Openai/anthropic/deepmind employee
>>108525056>The best hope for a free AGI is china What is happening in the world
>>108525138The bad guys won WWII and we have been living with the consequences of that for 80 years.
>>108525229In an alternate universe >Inukai Tsuyoshi isn't assassinated, the japanese military is reigned in, they never invade Asia>Sun Yat Sen doesn't give power to Yuan Shikai, China becomes a Democratic republic, not a communist dictatorship >America remains an isolationist country>Europe is kept in a balance by Russia, Germany and the British-French alliance, no large scale war breaks out
>>108525056Internet is still free, you just don't need the freedom, addiction is enough.AGI, singularities and other fairy tales do not exist in the real worls. If you were not illiterate you would understant that there's no such thing as infinite energy or infinite resources or infinite anything. It's a gimmick from math, which does not describe real world.
>>108525276Freedom is not "you don't pay money". It's the maximizing of the ability for individuals to exercise their free will to shape their lives. A citizen under a communist state who doesn't have to pay for food is not free.Many things are not infinite, but exponentials do exist and are extremely important. Human population, the number of connections in a network, the performance of CPUs, are all exponential in growth.
>>108525229you are evil
>>108525361Yes, and?No singularities due to AI are happening. Not now, not in near future, not ever. And math supports that if you build a correct model that acconts for available resources, not just a stupid graph with extrapolation. Last famous case when someone relied on something stupid like that, it was Marx creating communism.Internet if free. Go and get what you want. If you want.
>>108525106food has room for competitionthe first player to achieve agi makes all others irrelevantthat is what the bubble is built upon
>>108525056Were you expecting to run a super-intelligent artificial consciousness on your 20 year-old librebooted IBM stinkpad?
>>108525273All you get at that point is an even bigger war later on with stronger tech unless nukes still get made around the 50s and everyone gets too scared.Germany and russia wanted the war to happen and britain and france were both growing weaker because of the british empire commiting financial suicide in ww1 and France being decades deep into denographic decline. Something like the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact to start the war would have still happened.The eastern side was really the only preventable one. It happened because Japan felt they were next on the chopping block of european imperialism and got pushed off the edge by america antagonizing them after ww1 by doing things like forcing the british to break their alliance with them. If china becomes democratic and stable and alligns with the west, it might have still happened though.
>>108525505Super intelligence may not happen, but clearly the tech has enormous power, in the same way browsers, search engines, ISPs hard. And it is also clear it is being increasingly monopolized by a few. And this centralization is a broad trend in technology.
>>108525373the ukraine is azov naziyou lost nafo troon
>>108525642
>>108525056AGI won't be achieved in the nearest decade. What's happening right now is technocrats are trying to outdo themselves in creating an illusion of an AGI utilizing text prediction models that are based on linear algebra, and due to how inefficient this idea is they are pumping an economic bubble to gobble up all the hardware resources just to woo the investors into wasting their money on a stock that will nosedive.
>>108525056agi will require a giant datacenter to runand if it is achieved there will be massive global protests to give it human rights
>>108525056They'll unleash a bioweapon on the surface of the planet and live in bunkers for a while. You don't understand how bad things are gonna get. They've been building underground cities this past decade to sweep away any of those problems.
>>108525763yup, outed yourself do a 41% pronto
>>108525056>We failed to make the Internet free.Just a reminder that redditors have a large responsibility for this.
>>108526405wonder why they want them in space now
>he can't afford a small vera-rubin clusterjust stop being poor
>>108525505A lot of angry guys with guns can take away freedom, the technological bar isn't that high if TPTB are motivated and the populace aren't.
>>108525642>you lost nafo troonThe USSR was one of the bad guys in WWII too.
>>108525597This is not something to discuss here really. Not that such a problem does not exist, but it is not a tech problem at all. It's about finances. No matter what tech you crate if someone lobbies the lawmakers so that he would get a cut from the money flowing through your tech company and later regulates you out of existance in favour of his own thing, or just takes over your company etc.Nothing about it is a tech problem. It's finances, law, organized crime etc.
>>108525642>azov nazibased
