It's the same shit with AMP; they are trying to sell you a solution to a problem that they created themselves:>if you didn't had to load a shiton of JavaScript on the page, it would load way faster.>it would even save the the greedy capitalist bastard site owner money by not having to send 50MB to a user who just wants to read 2MB worth of content.>it would make the user experience better because lazy loading is not instantaneous; when the user scrolls, they have to wait a second for the content to load. It's not instantaneous.I imagine someone will eventually develop an extension that essentially lies to the site regarding the actual viewport, saying you have a monitor with a height much bigger than it actually is so that it triggers the loading of such elements. Site owners have proven themselves unworthy of knowing when you scroll down to a given page section.Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
>>108526889noscript/umatrix fixes that
>>108527392Enjoy your empty page. Sites nowadays are booby-trapped with JS.
>>108526889You should have tried the original Mosaic. That didn't lazy load anything at all, and you could wait for several minutes for resources to be loaded before anything rendered at all.I remember preferring xgopher because that at least was quick, even if it looked like ass.
>>108527650i've never come across a site worth visiting that had this.
