Is entertainment the best use case for generative AI?I don't see how anyone but the most hyped up, sunk-cost fallacy kool-aid drinkers could ever think AI is suitable for engineering, research, or any critical task due to the simple fact that it hallucinates, and hallucination being inherent to the architecture of generative AI.Will the AI boom be able to sustain itself on chatbots and media generation alone?
>reddit meme>reddit spacingyep, go back
>>108533171Found the kool-aid drinker
>>108533163Humans hallucinate as well, Mendeleev dreamed the periodic table. If they come up with a decent verification model, bruteforcing tasks that have no deterministic solutions with AI might be a valuable research tool.
>>108534049That's not what hallucination means in AI
Honestly if they simply picked a model and focused on refining it and building a tool ecosystem around it it could actually be useful, it just wouldn’t be the universal everything machine they’re shilling LLMs as, and everyone seems determined to race for that when you’d still need to do all that even after there’s a “winner”
>>108533163I think so, yeah. Anything where actual, strict correctness is not required seems like the best use-case. Proper integration of AI shit into video games for instance might net us more reactive and interactive worlds where NPCs and such actually react to what's happening and what the player is doing.
>>108533171You are an homosexual
AI is for very serious cat research
