take the pentium 4 extreme pill, it has>no intel me>64 bit support>pci-e>ddr3 ram>the ability to use sata drives>runs windows 11 and modern linuxdo you really need more?
>>108536192Yes, I need a computer that can run software from 2026.
>>108536192Doesn't have TPM 2.0 support though.
>>108536192shit is too slow, I need at least a Core 2 Duo
Blender won't even open on that anymore because it requires a CPU with SSE4.2 support.
>>108536192Take me back to 2004 bros...
>>108536192Was there intelME already in quad-core CPUs and core 2 duos as well?
>>108536192>ddr3 ramWhat about RDRAM?
>>108536192>do you really need more?Actually I'd like lower power consumption.Maybe some arm with clusterfuck of a setup would be better? Or do they have intelME alternative of their own?
>>108536192>2 core at bestYou don't know how much an upgrade in system usability is the jump from 2 to 4 cores. Modern OS and software lose their shit with less than 4 cores.
>>108536698Not true. 1-2 is a very big difference indeed.But 2 cores with HT is fine
>>108536433only started with the core line of cpus
>>108536406>(((simd)))oy vey
>>108536433Those can be fully disabled with zero problem.Richard Stallman runs Core 2 Duo Thinkpad T400s to this very day for this reason alone.
>>108536369What is the use case for TPM?
>>108536192go home piednoel, you're drunk
