[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Eo2Z6EyU0AAJ-Yf.jpg (40 KB, 722x349)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>AI bros really think that if they stack enough [ 0 , 1 ] ranges they can replicate 1 quadrillion synaptic connections.
>>
why don't researchers just build an artificial brain? replicate the neuron then pay a bunch of people to spend a weekend laying out like a billion of them and connecting them all together
are theyu stupoid?
>>
>>108542235
You couldn't do more with it than you can do with natural brains currently
>>
>>108542235
Current supercomputer clusters can sim the whole cerebral cortex of a mouse, 9 million biophysical neurons and 26 billion synapses.

If Moore's law wasn't dead we'd be a few decades away from human brain simulation.
>>
>>108542207
>>
>>108542235
People have already tried that. The real question is: will it make money? If not, will it be able to scam investors for eternity?
>>
>>108542264
Perhaps it's for the best.
If you can sim it, you can record it, if you can record it, you can copy it, with those conditions, Technical immortality is possible and with it, the end of mankind.
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitter_lesson
>>
>>108542264
Not anywhere close.
Even the mouse is not fully simulated and it's a rough shitty simulation, if you did that with a human brain it'd be worse than demented.
>>
>>108542310
Baby steps.
You have to crawl before you walk

But as far as we know, with enough compute, it is possible
>>
>>108542303
that's a lot of words just to say "complex algorithms hard, simple algorithms easy"
>>
>>108542324
That's an assumption, a true simulation may really on qm effects that you couldn't even simulate properly on silicon.
>>
>>108542340
>Consciousness is quantummmmmmm
post disregarded
>>
>>108542207
Technically, with enough if-else gates you can encode arbitrarily complex behavior, so yes.
>>
>>108542377
NTA but
>quantum biology isn't real
We don't know dick about intelligence. And it would be very difficult to understate quantum effects on biology in general, much less something as complex as the human brain.
>>
>>108542264
YouTube science lady says that supercomputer nerds claim to have achieved the capacity to simulate a human brain and are going forward with the project.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ppbvaNzZ-tk
>>
>>108542394
Can you really? It is something people say when they don't know some things are not solvable with Math at all.
>>
>>108542507
If it's not solvable by math then it's not important
>>
>>108542491
man made horrors beyond my comprehension you say?
>>
>>108542491
Does that sound efficient to you?
>>
>>108542377
go learn something, tons of biological processes rely on quantum mechanics. Thinking it would be any different for the brain is ignoring all the data we have in everything else.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.