Fonts are technology What fonts do you use and why? For me, it's fast font for increasing readability and reading speedhttps://github.com/Born2Root/Fast-Font
>>108542693ive never used anything other than the default fonts on windows desuyours got me intrigued tho, have u actually noticed improvements in reliability when using fast font?my eye sight is kinda meh so idk maybe it could help me a bit
>>108542693this font makes me read slower baka
>>108543241> default fonts on windows desuLuxury is the default fonts in Postscript.All you really need in this life is a subset of that—the default fonts from PDF.
>>108542693fixed, the xterm default, everywherettf fonts literally slow down your terminal> Fonts are technologyyesttf fonts are literally slower to render, fonts shouldn’t run on virtual machines, they literally slow down the software using thempcf > bdf > ttf
>>108543241It helps me a lot. Usually I'm a slow reader because my eyes have trouble following the spot I'm reading in the line, especially when looking for the next line without skipping or re-reading the previous line
>>108542693I think I might have slight dyslexia, but feels like this font is really drilling into my brain.Might need to actually try out this one.Not pretty though, that's the downside.
>>108542693Are you dyslexic OP?https://opendyslexic.org/
MS Sans Serif traced to TrueType with simple AI-made script that converts the pixels to vector squares.Not really, though.
I use Comics Sans postunironically.
>>108543725Yeah I am. But fast font has an opendyslexic variant also, and that helps even better. https://github.com/Born2Root/Fast-Font/blob/main/fast-fonts/Fast_OpenDyslexic.ttf
>>108543854Surprisingly, they say that Comic Sans turned out to be perfect for dyslexia.
>>108543854
>>108543286i think its just for dyslexics
>>108543606yeah see, this guy obviously has dyslexia
>>108544467I've heard that for Open Sans, and that it's easier to read long numbers. I'm not dyslexic, so it's hard for me to be sure.
>>108545800
>>108545800It's definition (ii) and it's a double negative.Opposite of opposite of literal, or not not literally.Double negatives are perfectly fine linguistically. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative
>>108545800if it’s not a word, why it works when people use it?> reads like a word, sounds like a word, works like a word…unironically, it’s a wordI will be happy when it’s added to the dictionaryyeah, unironically :)
Comfy font
>>108543483nigga what the fuck is your computer if it can't render fonts instantly, do you seriously live on Pentium III or something?
>>108549994that's horrible.
>>108550267No
>>108542693helvetica, consolas
https://codeberg.org/problems_available/configs/src/branch/home/private-build-plans.Wub.toml
>>108550520This is a custom build of iosevka made with https://typeof.net/Iosevka/customizer
>>108550101my work requires the cpu to be close to 100% most of the time, so the available performance for myself is often close to a pentium III, yes