>try to open a website>doesn't work well on Firefox and zen>doesn't work well on Vivaldi>works fine on chromewell sorry guys, the free internet bullshit aren't going to work when chrome alternatives aren't working well with many websites
>>108544978Life could be so simple.Also isn't Vivaldi chromium based?
>>108546952>braveis brave still the retarded perpetual malware downloader's browser of choice?
>>108546952yes but only chrome made the website fully work which is confusing...chrome seems to do better than most other browsers, I tried their new vertical tabs feature and it is amazing
>>108544978Looks like tits
>IMG_٢٠٢٦٠٤٠٧_٠٣١١٤٠.jpgThe fuck?
>>108544978People post this all of the time, yet they never list which sites don't work.
>>108544978>>try to open a website>>doesn't work well on Firefoxbeen using firefox for 15 years and I only encountered this issue twice:>google meethad to use it for a job interview and the audio wouldn't work. i assume this is google intentionally fucking over firefox users for not using their browser with their product>peacockwas trying to watch the olympics on it but apparently they have some insane DRM shit that only works with chrome and maybe safari. i tried spoofing my user agent but apparently it's also known to not work with linux so idk if that change would've worked fine otherwiseand that's it. neither things i care about using regularly. i've had ublock break plenty of sites, but if a site breaks from functioning adblock, it's a not a site i want to visit