Dead on arrival
>>108550519How hard can it be to support technologies that are 15+ years old? These people are just stupid and lazy.
>>108550519I got shilled this on Youtube today.https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/sase/prisma-browser lol
>>108550543Depends how standardized they are. C2D should be very standard...
>>108550543While also writing for more modern platforms? That's the problem. It's taking time away from optimization for newer paradigms because you keep dragging legacy compatibility along.Besides, it's open source. If there is a demand to have it run on older stuff and run better on that stuff then that's what forks are for.
>>108550543people using core 2 duos will submit pull requests for it I'm sure
>>108550519>IT'S CURRENT YEAR
>>108550578All the work has been done already though. Stupid & lazy is the problem.
>>108550543You need to give up on modern x64 instructions or create condition checks which is double work
>>108550519He is right, I'd imagine only dirt poor jeets still use 15 year old hardware.
>>108550551>agentic browser>company will be gone by 2027Just like the crypto companies. the CEO may as well be a jeet woman.
>>108550519>Project>Seems cool>The original project owner has a burnout>The project gets infested by typical rustafarians>The project immediately gets fucking gayDead.
>>108550614I imagine trying to carry legacy compatibility means having to write in a lot of case switches for the presence of certain processor features into the code.
>>108550519Who cares? Ladybird will never be a browser.
>>108550578>if you want x feature you should fork it and maintain it yourselfthis enrages and confuses the open-sores communitybtw 486 code is getting removed from linux. suck it leeches.
>>108550629I say this in maximal sincerity. I WISH Palo Alto networks would go out of business by 2027.i don't think it will though.
>>108550543Why should devs waste their times pessimising their vectorized code to such a low common denominator with maybe 1% of users?
>>108550685It might, because that ad they showed the world on Youtube was pretty shit.
>>108550519>Technology is le bad because it is le oldWhat is the real reason. Doing a John Oliver is not a reason.
>>108550654>>The original project owner has a burnoutIsn't Kling the original project owner?
>>108550519>C2Duo25 cent processor
>>108550519I'm sure all 20 users running XP on their Core 2 Duo will be devastated.
>>108550519he's rightespecially when you want a Javascript interpreter written in assembly
new goodold bad
>>108550543It's because they want to lean on SIMD as much as possible because all the talented programmers left the project(s), anyway RIP SerenityOS/Browser, it all went to shit when JT became a tranny and Andreas started fatmaxxing to impress a bunch of 20 year old polish memelords, it was fun while it lasted
>>108550519ho no, the 3 users world-wide won't be able to use this software, how will they recover
>>108550519No technical reason given.These are the equivalent of “vibe coders”They’re likely stealing code from other places but are depending on some high level libraries in binary form that can’t be re-compiled without using SSE instructions that don’t exist on core2 duo.It’s obvious they haven’t a clue about how software or hardware even works.Microsoft artificially pulled the same stunt by artificially requiring the popcnt instruction.They’re not even legitimate enough to bother figuring out their incompetence level. It’s likely just a startup scam.
>>108551617The root of all problems in "modern" tech right there.
>>108553225>Hardware acceleration is... Le bad!
Who gives A FUCK. They already decided months ago to troon it into Rust.
>>108550519>we aren't confident our browser will have performance good enough to run on older hardware
>>108553225JT wasn't even a Serenity dev, he was just working in the Jakt language with Andreas, which was indeed dead on arrival.
>>108550543If a single library stops supporting your ancient shitbox then you're out of luck. Feel free to fork and maintain it
>>108553338>Being intellectually lazy is... Le good!
>>108550543it's just annoying to support, especially if you use shitlangs like C/C++.
>>108550519Isn't it funny that we have all this great hardware now, but instead of using it to speed up existing use cases, existing use cases just get slower?
>>108550519i wasn't going to use it anyways just because the name is transcoded
>>108550626I'm comfortably wealthy and have a win xp/7 Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 with a gtx 970 in it, as well as an xp/8 dual boot with an Intel Pentium E6500 and a 750 in it, along with a variety of other machines runing everything from cpm through open solaris to suse to win 10 and 11, NT4, Win2K pro and symbos x80 etc etcYou just sound like a sad little fag to me you probably are very proud of a fag gatming spaceheater lgbt led box that youtube told you was kewl. I on the other hand actually like computers
>>108550543>These people are just stupid and lazy.You're stupid, retarded and a massive faggot.
>>108554461Well that sounds like a (You) problem. If you care so much about those ancient platforms, its up to you to support it them.Look at Steam hardware surveys for example. People like you barelly even register.It'd be retarded for eithe commercial or open source projects to support you, unless they had tons of resources to waste and nothing else better to do.
>>108553894>Intellectually lazyholy shit you're such a disingenuous larper it's unrealbasedlennials want to send computing back 25 years ago because they peaked in 2001 lol
I’m not going to buy a modern, proprietary goybook. Projects like this either need to support my X200 or go away.
>>108555680Ladybird has the potential to become the best browser but it sucks that it's stuck on linux.
>>108555351Nigga, run modern software on old hardware and tell me it got more efficient. Retard.
>>108550519And when exactly is it even supposed to arrive?
>>108555746After it eventually gets enshittified.
>>108555746They are planning an alpha at the end of the year.
>>108555750it's foss fa.m
>>108554461All of this crying when you can pick up a 3600 plus ram plus mobo for $150 and not be such a whiney faggot
XP-troons are the most annoying fucks in the universe
>WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TELLING ME THIS WONT RUN ON MY Commodore 64>WHAT THE FUCK BRO LAZY FUCKSKill yourselves.
>>108550519The best measure would be "is it actually viable to run on a period correct computer of the time?".The linux kernel is too big to run well on a 486 with 8MB of RAM now, so it makes sense to drop it.
>>108550519twitter really has a way of exposing how fucking stupid people are
Here you goYou can fix this yourselfhttps://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/blob/master/Libraries/LibJS/Bytecode/AsmInterpreter/asmint.asm
>>108556979There are llms that run on c64, what you thought of as sarcasm is objectively true
>>108550519they won't support windows, it was DOA even before your thread.
>>108557881>windowswhat year is it?
new update videohttps://youtu.be/h14rx8NrLic
niggas out there still using Windows XP and Core 2 Duos. write your own software if you insist on sticking to decades-old primitive technology
>>108550543implying that these optimised programs work better than old software. Who cares if it uses some bleeding edge shit when the old program still is faster. Programs are faster if they do less work. The browser is an exception to this I guess, because it's a runtime for running shit code, so it probably is optimised to run that garbage with a sensible performance. Javascript was a mistake.
>>108558009not sure where windows xp comes from, afaik ladybird doesn't have a windows port at all. up to date linux works just fine on core2duos
