[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HBS2Y9gb0AA1Bpq.jpg (798 KB, 2150x3740)
798 KB
798 KB JPG
This month on broken vibecoded slop, they've fucked up which theme extension values map to which parts of the UI despite the API and docs not changing in the past 10 years. Almost all themes now have the wrong low-contrast color for the active tab and omnibar.
>>
File: Chrome Matte Black.png (57 KB, 976x221)
57 KB
57 KB PNG
what it's supposed to look like post-2022 material 3 fischer price UI redesign
>>
File: bright as fuck.png (22 KB, 902x198)
22 KB
22 KB PNG
147
>>
Explain this in layman terms
>>
>>108552964
google does not test their software before deploying it
>>
This commit refers to the change as a fix https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/d738ec5755b0cdf72c36d825eb1f2e6780e0e287
but it's very clearly completely changing the baseline behavior with no justification given. It's pretty clear the point of kColorOmniboxResultsBackground https://source.chromium.org/search?q=kColorOmniboxResultsBackground
is very different to the point of kColorToolbarBackgroundSubtleEmphasis https://source.chromium.org/search?q=kColorToolbarBackgroundSubtleEmphasis
and that the old behavior is correct. The old behavior is additionally what the Material color picker themes use https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:chrome/browser/ui/color/material_omnibox_color_mixer.cc;l=30
as was already obvious from the fact that only web store themes broke and not color picker themes. The bug report https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/485258057
references a regression incoming since 143 but no behavior changed in 143, I was there. We see the red herring first schizobabbled by the exact asshole that signed off the commit https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/485258057#comment4
Absolutely garbage systems and culture.
>>
I want the angled tabs UI back so fucking bad.
>>
>>108552984
Treating PRD as the test environment is now standard corporate practice to save money.
>>
>>108552964
I don't think laymen should be on /g/.
>>
>>108553207
If the bug report is correct then it's a tint, not a color, that needs adjusted in your theme. But I downloaded 130 to check and the bug report is wrong.
>>
I didn't know themes still worked or were still supported. I haven't seen anyone using one since like 2013.
>>
>>108552905
Fknd one human being willing to write 25k loc of c++ in 2026 for free.
>>
>>108552964
OP is made because the shade of grey in his address bar became 10% more light and now he wants to kill himself.
>>
>>108558533
it's a lot more than 10%
>>
>>108552909
>>108552913
Lol does Chrome still not support native transparency from W11 and/or macOS?
>>
>>108561191
It dose on Windows 11 albeit behind a flag. Mica. I'm pretty sure it used to support Aero out of the box by default so I'm not sure what's changed in the past 15 years ah hell who am I kidding
>>
On the plus side, allowing extensions access to specific sites is FINALLY working again. That was broken for 2 entire major versions.
>>
>>108553535
I just want the tab and address bar to take up less space. It's nearly doubled in the past 3 years and is well more than double what it was back when it was good. Very likely whoever made that decision uses a 16:10 mac and it never crossed their mind that other people might not.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.