Required government ID is basically inevitable for every social media site if they want any chance of stopping AI bots. This includes 4chan
>>108559092youd think that is why big tech pushing it
Required execution is basically inevitable for every frog poster
If it keeps the kiddies out, then I'm all for it.
>>108559092they want ID purely for surveillance reasons, not for le safety of le children
>>108559092that's not a method that would stop ai spam bots you COLLOSAL IDIOT. you need live biometrics i.e. active iris detection, vital signs monitoring, etc.
>>108559662*keeping out le children or le spam botsalso doing it for surveillance AND profit
>>108559666checkedalso it'll get there sooner than we think. 10-15 years maybe
>>108559092Indians are actually worse than bots. And this doesn't even solve both problems
>>108559662No, parents want ID for "le safety of children" (putting it that way reveals you as a pedo btw) but FAGMAN is willing to do it because of the data they will gain.
If it keeps the wumaos and russian psyops off our internets then it's a good thing, no?
>>108559092That wont stop them.At all.
>>108559092Meanwhile, Uggbhuddhu Ngubugdhu in Africanistan rejoices because he made 400 Africanistan Dollars (0.00000004USD) and all he had to do was give someone his useless government ID. What are you gonna do, be a racist and ban his entire country? All his neighbors are doing it, too.
the internet is basically over. i won't even be able to say hi to my frens.
I don't see any issue with age verification.
>>108559794>(putting it that way reveals you as a pedo btw)Every time the government (and often industry as well) wants crackdowns on freedoms it's always child safety that gets invoked as one of the primary reasons even when it's transparently bullshit. Pic related.Not saying there aren't a lot of predators nor bad shit out there but parents should pay more attention to their kids' smart-device use and raise them to recognize scams and predatory behavior so they don't fall for them.
>>108559092I don't know why people care about bots so much. I see a cool post, I respond to it. What difference does it make to me if it's a person or a bot? And if I want real information, I won't be getting it from a random post on the internet.
>>108560230t. bot
>>108560102That's because there are legions of troon pedos with their "cartoons" out there trying to groom kids. The fact that FAGMAN piggybacks on those genuine concerns doesn't make those concerns fake. You must be 18 to post here, btw.
>>108560230I feel that way whenever I see three dozen people chime in on a reddit post saying "This is fake!" or "Can't anyone else tell this is obviously AI?!?!?" as if their drivel that contributes nothing is somehow more valuable than an ai driven anecdote or funny joke.
>free 3 months of 4chan Gold if you photo ID
>>108560266>The fact that FAGMAN piggybacks on those genuine concerns doesn't make those concerns fake. And? We already have parental controls in phones, computers and video game consoles; the concerns need not be real when the implementation of child safety is entirely invasive and exploitative, give children's data to random sites? Force everyone to partake in the same invasiveness when supposedly only children are affected by the consequences? It's complete bogus.
