>2027>AI still isn’t capable of altering the board position to a Scholar's mateWhen will you guys accept it is snake oil?
>>108562334>response 1If it *could* create this phot flawlessly, what would be your next excuse? >response 2it’s only like 5 years old bro>response 3ok? It’s also an expert hacker and has solved a few unsolved math proofs>response 4so you’re just gonna ignore the 99.9% of all cases that it *can* do? That would have needed to be MANUALLY designed just a few years ago? You know much time this shit saves?>response 5if they wanted it to be good at drawing scholar’s mate, then they would train it on that. It’s just a matter of time.>response 6I’m guessing you’re not even using the pro version. Not to mention the internal models.>response 7but can you create that photo, yourself? I doubt it.>response 8imagine using a hammer to cut a pizza
But it *is* however capable of altering the RAM landscape by hundreds of dollars to a checkmate.
>>108562334at least the hands are good now
>>108562417>if they wanted it to be good at drawing scholar’s mate, then they would train it on that. It’s just a matter of time.The fact you have to reinforce this specific scenario to get it right, it really shows the limitations of this tech.
>>108562649yeah…. and it took 4 billion years for humans to get it right. So… yeah..
>>108562334roosters are ruthless and unforgiving opponents.
>>108562334same thing as AI coding people expect magic button to just go 100% to completion and more when it's an assistant toolAI do heavy lifting you finish it in photoshop
>>108562417lmao
It's just a shitty image generator that's pretending to be intelligent.I get more kicks out of a chess engine that only evaluates positions based on pieces on the board alone.
mightly cock
