[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Sources:
>https://www.techpowerup.com/347906/intel-binary-optimization-tool-changes-code-execution-with-heavy-vectorization

>https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/geekbench-investigates-up-to-30-percent-jump-with-intels-ibot-performance-gain-attributed-to-newly-vectorized-instructions

>https://videocardz.com/newz/geekbench-6-7-released-with-core-ultra-200s-plus-bot-detection

Why are people arguing if it is cheating or not when the real issue is that this is an explicit arbitrary remote code execution vulnerability? I mean, even assuming that the code always produces the exact same same results, it is still a very lame coverup for allowing them to also do anything they want as long as the user does not notice it.
>>
>>108562502
>NOO YOU CAN'T MAKE MY COMPUTER FASTER IT'S UNFAIR
>>
File: 1767648507745149.jpg (163 KB, 700x934)
163 KB
163 KB JPG
>>108562502
Isn't like 90% of a gookbench score:

A) How fast you can hardware encode/decode JPG.

B) How fast you can hardware encode/decode H.264.

C) How fast you can hardware encode decode AES encryption?

Anyway x265 seems like the go-to if you're not a brainlet since it just tests how fast the actual CPU is, not hardware encoders.
>>
File: chad-hdd.jpg (65 KB, 497x404)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>108562521
I just made my computer faster with -mcpu=native --param=l1-cache-size=32 --param=l1-cache-line-size=128 --param=l2-cache-size=1024 -falign-loops=32:7:16:3 -falign-jumps=16 -O2 -fvect-cost-model=dynamic.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
>>
>>108562601
would compiling the kernel with these flags help much
>>
>>108562568

likely would to have 8K pron watch it with 720P tv and compare gpu temperatures
>>
File: 1624849262257.gif (344 KB, 256x192)
344 KB
344 KB GIF
>>108562641
Probably not, aligning loops and jumps can get you like 7-8% performance uplift depending on the workload, but it can also make your performance worse, too.
>>
>>108562641
The Kernel in particular is already fine tuned with lots of compiler hints and layout decisions.

Even in generic terms, using explicit cache and alignment values can backfire horrendously if there is a mismatch. I would only use -march=native, which implies mtune, instead.
>>
>>108562502
hyper threading led to spectre and meltdown, what nuclear clusterfuck will this corner-cutting lead to?
>>
>>108562521
Replacing all the code with mov [score], MAX_SCORE doesn't make the former faster and is called cheating.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.