[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Vacuumcleaners are technology.

I've had a 150usd ish xiaomi stick vacuum cleaner for a few years now and it's just trash and I'm really tired of the way I have to clean it. I'm constantly left with shit in my eyes and nose.
Looked at local/online stores and dyson is the only brand that have the external chute type of cleaning. Their brand-tax is massive, as the three models I'm looking at are at 900-1000usd.

You do clean your floor, right, anon? What are you using?
>>
>>108565100
Cordless Dysons are trash. At least the one we had would blow dust *away* unless you approached it from exactly the correct angle, and the battery life wasn't that great if you actually wanted to use it on the mode that is worth using.

I got a Miele C3. Not as convenient as a cordless, sure, but I'm happy with it.
>>
>>108565179
If they are trash, why are everyone copying them?

I'm never dealing with bags or cables ever again.
>>
I bought a cordless dyson a decade ago and now everyone in my family has one. they work fucking great. you can get the old v8 model refurbished directly from dyson on ebay for less than $200.
>>
>>108565100
>people actually buy chinese vacuum cleaners
What do you do when the app terminates service? I don't know if this one requires an "app" (and it seems unlikely) but chinese trash is always like this.
>>
>>108565100
>You do clean your floor, right, anon? What are you using?
I click my room on my phone and hit vacuum then mop
thats it
I'm not using a handheld vacuum like a caveman boomer from the 1900s
>>
File: 565603.png (673 KB, 1025x1018)
673 KB
673 KB PNG
>>108565100
i need dyson quality but it MUST TAKE 18V makita battery for me to buy it at dyson prices.


its literally that easy for dyson.

they just dont know.
>>
>>108565281
Same reason everyone copies Apple. But I'm not saying that all cordless vacuums are trash, just that my experience with Dyson ones has been. Other brands might be better, idk.
>>
>>108565358
No apps are needed, grandpa.

>>108565398
Don't you have things on your floor?

>>108565410
Ryobi has one and it takes it's own batteries from other machines, seems great for a bigger household.

>>108565425
Xiaomi is usually good at their copies, but them and the other copies are all the same china price, or just straight up discontinued for years since they were bad.
>>
>>108565451
>Don't you have things on your floor?
The arm in the picture picks it up, dingus. Besides, how the hell do you vacuum normally if stuff is on the floor? Go around it? That's stupid. And what kind of child leaves stuff on the floor anyway?
>>
>>108565100
I don't like carpeting, I rather have a hard floor that can be swept & mopped,

Ever pull up carpeting that been there for 20+ years? Lots of fine dust under there that vacuum cleaners won't get and I am sure temperature changes will bring some up plus walking on it will unsettle some and bring it into the air too
>>
>>108565666
and carpet is all plastic now so... enjoy your microplastics.
>>
>>108565100
I have a dyson v11 that I bought for around $500 and I fucking love it. Same as this anon >>108565312, everyone that uses it wants one. Been a couple of years and the battery is still fine. The battery isn't going to last too long on max, which you really need for carpet, so if you're intending to clean an entire house worth of carpet in one go you'll be disappointed. But I only have carpet in the bedrooms and it kicks ass. My bed is pretty low, but it can still reach all the way in there, even in the tight side with only 3-4 ft clearance from the wall. My mother got a v8, which I wouldn't recommend. Battery doesn't last as long, the canister is tiny and it doesn't seem to have as much suction on carpet.
I just checked amazon and I'm kind of amazed this thing still sells for almost $600 wtf. I guess on the bright side they don't seem to discontinue these every 1-2 years so I might be able to get an OEM replacement battery if mine every gets weak. That's been my one worry.
>>
>>108565179
i think cordless are all trash. battery tech simply cannot deliver the suction power that a 2kW wired motor can.
i paid £500 for a cordless Miele thinking it would be better but it collects dust instead (ironic, i know) and use a corded shitty £100 vac that i bought years ago instead



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.