>>108566366
I think they shred them. Cool, right?

>>108566366
i guess giving back to producer for recycling
thats why we see so less in secound hand market

>>108566378
Why would the juden not want money and sell it to goyim like me?

File: nvidia_h100_1_94_1.png (568 KB, 1500x1135)

568 KB PNG

>>108566838
Do you have use for a datacenter GPU that doesn't even have display outputs? There really isn't much of a market for them

>>108566888
yeah you're right
they should just punch a hole through every single gpu once they're done with them

>>108566366
>what happens if their gpus are obsolete?
they keep working
>do they buy new ones?
eventually
>what about the older ones?
recycled, refurbished, sold
>how could they sell so many?
need a lot to train models fast

>>108566888
fucking obviously I do, yes. the issue is that everyone listing their h100s for sale was only able to justify buying them by claiming they would take 6 years to depreciate, and is trying to sell them at a price that would make sense if that were true. nobody is paying $20,000+ for a fucking h100

>>108566366
I think we reached the limit of Moore's law, hardware isn't getting any better, and things produced now are not going to be obsolete until we get quantum computers

>>108566838
nVidia could buy them back and shred them

>>108566838
Nvidia has contracts with them so that they destroy it once they are done using them and in exchange they get to have a nice discount that's better than just selling them again.

>>108567065
>>108567060
proof?

>>108566888
Yes, run models.

There is cost analysis for the gpus and they don't just vibe purchase whatever they feel like. Generally there is an expected life and revenue per-gpu with the idea that the gpus will be sold at some point. Hopper was supposed to be phasing out right now but compute is in such high demand that Hopper units are re-contracting at higher rates than 12 months ago.

>>108566888
what kind of larping shill retard are you???

>>108567039
it's over ...