Is Windows Defender the only decent Microsoft product?
Bitlocker is fine.
>>108572640kek no. it protects microsoft software, not any installed third party software.it also cant detect cryptominers and rootkits. its free because its shit
>>108572640it only exists to tell you that you're running a "virus" if you attempt to install cracked software. trash software trash company
It keeps telling me I have a "settingsmodifier" virus because I block microsoft telemetry domains in the hosts file lmao
>>108572640I've used bloatware like Nortons AV, malwarebytes and Super-Anti Spyware that detected infections that Defender didnt.the reason why you think Defender is so good is because its not detecting anything and you think that means you're safe.I use all this bloatware in my job using various AVs installed on customers machines.
>>108572650bitlocker is glowie backdoored. its useless
>>108572640no.
>>108572650MS gives your keys away if the authority/govenment ask for them.>>108572887>>108572890It goes against things like Avast, Defender is better in that department, you still want MBAM to do a scan here and there.>>108572892Every other AV will detect 'hacktools' the same way.
>>108572640It's honestly pretty decent yeah.
I installed a risky russian crack that added itself to the exclusions list in Defender and thats all it took to bypass defender. pathetic
>>108572650ask yourself why Microsoft want to keep your encryption keys "safe on the cloud" and why you cant opt out of that
>>108572640It would be very good but like all microsoft software, it does not acknowledge your free will. You cant turn it off, you cant stop it from running in the background, you can neuter it with herculean effort but it will always be there
