Why does no one give a fuck about riscv?
>>108574109No use case.
>>108574109RISC-V is risky.
>>108574109Because it's chink competition. Censorship basically.I hope EU adopts this and it becomes global standard, I don't want to choose between chink and us backdoor. If someone can do it, it's Europe.
>>108574109i bet 30 bucks that if it becomes mainstream, it will be like arm with 3000 bootloaders and driver fuckery, but even worse
>>108574109Not a good design.
>>108574109Can't game on it so it failed Gaymer's decide what tech succeeds
>>108574109It might be the slow realization that the majority of the costs of any given CPU is the fabrication and development of the CPU and not the "underserved profits" that ARM and x86 vendors take.RISC-V so far has only really proven itself to be a way of cost reduction for CPUs in applications that don't rely on any specific architecture. Western Digital for example can save a few cents for the HDD controllers as they fully control the software stack anyway and can cross compile.For end user CPUs pretty much all RISC-V vendors are smaller than ARM/x86 vendors. Bigger vendors get better wafer prices period.
>>108574142Europe has been culturally, technologically and financially irrelevant since the end of WWII. You're an set of American vassal states, and the US is itself an Israeli vassal state.
>>108574142EU wants backdoors too. Have you seen the chat control stuff they keep trying to push through?
>>108574109Looks like A Counter Strike logo
>>108574491That's appropriate cause the first counter-strike servers were on a RISC-V platform.
>>108574109last time anyone was excited about risc-v was 2005 when he/she had tablet device while in public bus nokia did phablets no buyer as everyone piss poor
>>108574303>I MATTER! you have no dad
>>108574480Cope as you die in wars for Israel, while Europeans do not.
>>108574303You can with discrete AMD GPU. GPU drivers are the problem, not the cpu, when it comes to that.>>108574483Do you publically announce you want a backdoor?
>>108574480Europe is the world leader in sophisticated manufacturing
>>108574109I'm excited about RISC-V. I think it's really cool and that it continues to progress. But performance wise it is still behind even ARM. Software compatibility while not terrible, is also behind ARM. It needs to get much better in these area I think before people will take it seriously. I also wish they'd do a standardized BIOS/UEFI so that you didn't need a custom image for every device.
>>108574700>low cost commercial aircraft that ahmed can put together after a week of trade school>sophisticatedYou'd have been better off listing Zeiss or ASML. Europe is so far behind on ACTUALLY sophisticated aeronautics it's not even funny.
>>108574794manned combat aircraft probably only have one generation left before drones do all the front-line fighting.meanwhile civilian Airbus planes don't feature the crash_into_ground.exe feature that Boeing offers.
good for micro-controllersway behind ARM for phonelaptop or desktop are a joke.
>>108574109Is there a risc-v device for less than 200$ i can play doom and quake on?
>>108574794Any late cold war AA can drop this shit off your sky like it's nothing. Ask Russians, they have like a thousand of those pieces of scrap metal. It's only good for bombing towelheaded people in sandals, who can't fight back. Arabs were right when they called you a bunch of pussies. I thought they were mad about not having tech, but they were right.
>>108574466risc-v isn't about licensing costs, it's about complete avoidance of contractual obligation in general. you will never be allowed to make a FOSH arm processor, for example.
>>108574466And don't forget that when people use ARM they are not just using the ISA, but also the cores, and arm cores are the lead without competition in every field that is not competing with x86. >>108574109>https://sifive.vercel.app/press/sifive-raises-400-million-to-accelerate-high-performance-risc-v-data-center-solutionsMaybe we would see something in the future.>>108574992>FOSHThe last rpi pico had the option for a open source riscv processor, performance was slightly behind the M33.
>>108574255This.It's supposed to be free but everyone uses it to shove more locked down firmware into their system.
>>108574109it only sounds good because no one uses it. the minute someone tries to use it for something useful they will hobble it with DRM and all kinds of shit to protect their investment.>>108575055>sifive aims at huge expensive chips they won't be selling to consumers, just like arm with the agi shit.
>>108574109
>>108575812so, which risc architecture did they mean, and how did it turn out?
>>108574109it is popular but not for consumer phones and computers
>>108574109Better question:Why is RISC-V even a thing when SuperH is off-patent now?RISC-V and AVR started as undergrad assignments that got a "C-" so I can't see how they even got this far.
RISC architecture is gonna change everything.
>>108574142Everyone shitposting with RISC-V instead of x86 or ARM won't mean there's no backdoors in those processors.>>108576842How's the "C-" relevant to the design itself?
>>108574957VisionFive 2 might be able to do it. 1.5ghz cpu, which I think goes up to 2.0ghz. 8 gb ram
>>108578587You're right, the biggest bottleneck is the SD card it's slow, and the NVMe is technically less secure/free, but you can use that in a pragmatic way. So,that is the reason why I got myself a VisionFive 2.There is a Lichee Pi which is even faster, if you want to break bank. :p
>>108574142>I hope EU adopts this and it becomes global standardyou mean, start fabbing it? do we have fabs to get it to any usable speeds?risc-v is at best not even penium speeds, is it? even on chinese/tsmc (best) fabs?
>>108576842>Why is RISC-V even a thing when SuperH is off-patent now?and what we would do with superH and why?
>>108576842>SuperHI was there, Gandalf, three thousand years ago...
>retarded 4-byte instruction length limit>no carry flag>dozens of extensions needed to do anything useful>no instruction to detect extensionsx86 doesn't have these problems.
Last I looked there were ultra cheap IoT processors, but beyond that basically useless
