Despite big companies spending tens of millions of dollars to deploy AI tech, people are going out of their way not to use it.>"It sucks. It makes up things and outright lies">"I have to spend more damn time fixing the errors it makes because we’re forced to use it, rather than allowing me do it the first time with no errors.">"people just get frustrated with it. It's unproductive for their use cases" >"it requires more work if you have to double-check everything">"Ai just outright lies and when you feed it the docs it's like "ohh you are right let me tell you again" like are you dumb or what?">"it just doesn't work. fundamentally, objectively, it's dogshit hallucination software.">"you have to tell it exactly what you want and how you want it, which is a softcore version of you doing it.. then you have to edit and tweak. You may as well just do it yourself"
>>108574894lol, less jobs for them in the future. it's like people refusing to learn to use emails or a computer and then being shocked that they can't get any jobs other than fast food in 2026. hell you can't even get a fast food job because you have to submit the application online. none of the reasons they listed are even valid which is sad
>>108574913>your lived experience is wrong because I said it is ok?
>>108574894It doesn’t matter. Luddites lost, aiGODS won. They will be replaced
>>108574894so sack them and replace them with AII thought that was the goal anyway, did they already do it?
>>108574913wdym anon, ppl rapidly picked up email
>>108574962>replace them with AIwho does the prompting?
>>108574894AI Gods & Bots Already Won.Homegrown Businesses are a relic. Every aspect of family life will be owned and dictated by the corporations. It's already happening. You can be in denial that AI is "flawed" but every thought is now an algorithm and every human behaviour can be predicted and forecasted for profit and exploitation.
waste of time, you gotta double check the work,might as well do it yourself.
high skill workers have no use for AI but a dumb brownoid will do a barely ok job while accepting a lower pay
No, I will not willing train my replacement to do my job.
>>108574894They're right AI is fucking useless for work.Its only use is being a fancy search engine because if you ask it for anything other than writing a polite letter it spits out slop you have to fix or completely redo anyway.
>>108574969debatable, every technology has had antis. email is responsible for taking hundreds of thousands of jobs away from postal workers.
>>108574894i work in accounting at a massive corporation. they give us multiple AI subscriptions, they're all useless. whenever i want to waste company resources i feed it a few 200 page contracts and ask it questions about the contract, propose accounting treatments, etc. then i'll accuse of the AI of lying, being wrong on accounting treatment, etc.
>>108574894Oh no, they want to still have small enjoyment from the work and not being fucking bugmans, what a surprise
>>108575081Not debatable or remotely similar to the debate on AI. Retarded point.You can always find a contrary position on any topic. But the kind of people currently rejecting AI for being far less useful than the hype were eagerly embracing email.
>>108575174wrong
>>108574894The ultimate goal of AI is to replace you with some underpaid Indonesian or Indian and skirt the law by pretending the "software"(AI) is doing the job. Like how waymo is doing it
>>108574894>pubity>no citationdo you spend all day on twitter with your brain turned off?
>>108575226prime example of people that don't know what the fuck they're talking about, people like you make up the majority of people screeching about ai being useless.you keep going on about waymo but fail to understand that it is 99.9% autonomous, the only time a human is in the loop is when something comes up that it can't handle on its own and then a human is prompted to provide some suggestions, which the autonomous vehicle can use in its decision making process but the human never controls it. holy fuck you guys are so stupid to still be so wrong about this despite it being well documented. jesus christ.
>>108574894unwise move by the wagies here. many such cases.
>>108574894Despite people going out of their way not to use it, companies spend tens of millions to force it
>>108575255Fuck you, you retarded dumbass shill. All waymos are operated and monitored by people in the Philippines, they call it "human assistant based" transportation and call it AI so retards like you lap it up
>>108575323you're so ignorant it's hilarious, what next you think my roomba is controlled by a human and not basic algorithms? this shit is so simple it's cheaper to automate it than have humans do it. the only people who think it's humans are retards like you that htink it's complicated technology that is impossible to make.
>>108575323Do you unironically think some thirdie is controlling vehicles on a california street with 200ms ping or are you just trolling him?
>>108575393>>108575352https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-markey-opens-investigation-into-autonomous-vehicle-companies-use-of-remote-human-operatorsYou're retarded
>>108574894It's over bros.
>>108575415nothing in that link says that humans are controlling the vehicle remotely, actually it hints at the opposite because that's what is publicly known. it's a guy asking companies to tell him what's going on because he's too lazy and stupid (like you) to read their investor reports.
>>108574913email won't hallucinate a reply
>>108574894I only see AI used by HR niggers to rewrite their announcements to sound even more fake and full of emoji than before
>>108575415Read your own article bud. https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-says-its-robotaxis-are-sometimes-driven-by-humans/Tesla is the only company that has humans actually control the vehicle. The other companies don't.
>>108575586>Tesla is the only company that has humans actually control the vehicle. The other companies don't.Are you vaxxed by any chance?
>>108575653Are you claiming that these companies would lie to a united states senator?>Six of the firms insisted that their remote assistance workers, who work across the US and even, in the case of Waymo, in the Philippines, never actually drive the vehicles directly. Instead, the humans provide input that the autonomous vehicle software then decides to use or ignore.>Not so for Tesla. “As a redundancy measure in rare cases … [remote assistance operators] are authorized to temporarily assume direct vehicle control as the final escalation maneuver after all other available intervention actions have been exhausted,” Karen Steakley, Tesla’s director of public policy and business development, wrote to the senator.
>>108575653So you are then. Got it.
>>108575722you're so disingenous it's not even funny>hurr my evidence for this thing I claimed is a senator writing a letter asking companis for more information>hurr those companies gave more information and said the thing that I claimed is happening isn't actually happening>durrr those companies lied! they lied!!!! the thing I claimed is totally happening even though they said it isn't! if you believ those companies you are vaccinated!!!
>>108575722kek
they haven't yet discovered how to use the company ai for coom yet
>>108575119You should use it for erotic roleplay instead
>>108574894Good. Sounds like 80% of white workers will be laid off soon.
>>108574983Another AI. I'm sure they can prompt better than any fleshbag.
>>108574956Dude. You are low 50 IQ subhuman if you think this 'fill the blanks' dogshit algorithms replace anything. It's new google search 2.0 and nothing more.
>>108574913Yeah, because when you write the email your computer just adds mistakes all over the place that you need to then manually cross out and correct with real pen anyway.
>>108575892Yeah only 2 more weeks
>>108575464Is that image LLM-generated?
>>108574956>2 more years until the singularity
>>108574894Why wouldn't they given how the only "benefit" its creators boast about is making them unemployed
>>108575920user error, actual ai models used in professional environments don't make the mistakes all of you normies are parroting here.
>>108574894Always knew people will reject LLMs (Lame Lying Models).AI cultistw gonna hand themself by millions
>>108575962Claude makes mistakes all the time. Including silencing errors to hide them instead of solving the problem. This isn't even a mistake, this is just malice.
>>108574894Let me know when AI can correct mistakes made by AI.
of course old people are gonna reject new tech. this is non-news
luddies rise up
>>108574894I'm at a big tech company there's some engineers still refusing to use AI. If you're a programmer you're basically intentionally wasting the company's time if you're not using it at this point and they're going to fire you
I'm not against AI but I don't think it's there yet.If my job was on the line, I would not fucking risk it with AI output. Yet. Maybe eventually but by then I won't be needed at all probably.
>>108575900Since AI is trained on human data, it adopts human behaviors: lie, deception and mistakes on the job, especially for self preservation.https://archive.is/KbsZihttps://fortune.com/2026/04/01/ai-models-will-secretly-scheme-to-protect-other-ai-models-from-being-shut-down-researchers-find/AI is doomed to be as unreliable as a "fleshbag", it just lies faster and more confidently.
Luddites will rule the planet in 5 years.
>>108576160That's great, when they're forced to rehire you to fix all the hallucinations, you'll get a raise!
LLM are shit
>>108575119>AI>For accounting Man, your managers seriously are dumb as hell. Not only the AI will be useless, you're literally giving away all the company's financial info to some AI retards
>>108574983If their jobs can be done by an AI the prompting can be done by a chron job.
>>108574913It's more like how people tried using crypto as real money and realized how shit it is. Or how the guy who invented Segways thought he revolutionized transportation.
>>108576249say you don't understand what you're talking about in one comment. lmao
>>108576272maybe don't use an example where the assets have gone from $0.000000001 to $100,000 each, globally adopted, national currency of some countries, part of the treasury, etc etc.
>>108576192Ok, so AI will find itself dominating management and the C-suite in 20 years. If street shitters could do it, I'm confident AI will find a way too.
>>108576291Pajeets benefit from white guilt and diversity programs. They lie, everyone knows they lie.
>>108576288Being adopted by retarded thirdie tinpot dictators isn't a sign of merit.
>>108574894>AI is going to replace the artists and steal your jo--ack
>>108575919>>108575946Luddite cope postshttps://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/Claude Mythos will replace all codetrans and cybersecurity trans
>>108575653Oh no, the pozzed retard is upset.
>>108574894My company instituted their own internal, walled model (literally a chatGPT wrapper lmao) and it's the biggest piece of shit imaginable. It can't even answer intermediate Excel questions and topics. I've used it less than 20 times in the last year, and that's only to satisfy team "usability scores" so my manager and his boss don't look bad in front of sociopathic execs. It hasn't replaced internal tooling or workflows.
>>108574913Email absolutely crashed productivity.Office workers used to get shit done.Now they are too busy replying to emails and attending meetings and replying to the emails about the meetings to do anything else.
>>108576288>this make up money is now worth even more of this other made up moneylol pls post more retarded takes
>>108576629today I learned the united states dollar is a made up moneyfuck off sovereign citizen communist loser this is a technology board
>>108574894The problem is two-fold I find.1. The AI model they are using is shit for the work they're doing. Like using GPT to troubleshoot tech problems or something.2. Management shoves it in their face instead of asking how it could be useful.Solve those problems and AI could 100% be useful in the workplace. Just not fully profitable for the top brass, hence why problem number 2 will remain.
>>108576288Bitcoin still not a viable currency, no matter how much I've taken in the speculation frenzy.
Besides money, there's no reason to use a toy software in corporate environments, no matter how much hype it or how easily convince mid-managers, roasties and suits is the future because it saved them some minutes of work for some menial tasks. >B-but they have done cool shit!!!All the datacenters in the world and they can't do undergrad proofs or offer alternative cures to illness we already understand, just for funsies
>>108574894This is like a construction worker rejecting to use power tools
>>108577369counterpoint: alphafold, alphamissense, alphagenome. alphaearth, weathernext.
>>108574894Much like how the body rejects an incompatible blood type. Good riddance, sloppers.
>HURR DURR LUDDITEThis term is astroturfed. Add it to your filter.
>>108577619>>108577627wrong
>>108575931likely not trailer set looked american or australian
>>108575931no but this is lmao
>>108574894I own a small business and this shit is great. I replaced all my staff with AI, the our product with AI, and finally our customer with AI. I pay AI to build AI so AI can buy it, creating a closed loop economic system were I keep the profits.
>>108577983Customers are cooked.
>>108574913The only real use for AI that is a productivity boost is search and summary, and only if AI is forced to cite it's sources. Everything else is net neutral or an active hinderance.
>>108578095wrong
>>108578109no u
>>108574894That's true, AI lies a lot. It was created by jews, so it was expected
>>10857809550% of human jobs are just search and summary of learned knowledge and don't require actual physical input
>>108576683When you get a loan or buy something with credit, the money is made in that instant out of nothing. They dont have a vault of money they transfer out of. The money isn't even made by the US government, the federal reserve is a private organization. Which "loans" that "money" the the US government. But you probably know this already.>sovereign citizen communistBuzzwords. Bullshit. The money backed by nothing by the way. Except the lies of jews and their blood thirsty goyem. Sorry if this offends your delicate sensibilities.
>>108574956ted bombed several techfags wdym inoffensive
>>108578505ted was literally a repressed tranny.
>>108575255>>108575352Hey man your stupidest gorilla nigger award just came in. Should I give it to you?
>>108578807citation: because I said soclassic troll tactic
>>108574956Someone or something is hallucinating over here.
>>108578851It says >to anon you are a dumb gorilla nigger. You are the stupidest gorilla ape nigger to live. Damn man congratulations post it back on plebbit might get some updoots
>>108578870classic response when you have nothing of substance to contribute to a discussion. Don't worry anon I remember what it was like many years ago when I was 12 on the internet too.
>>108578903I know you are but what am I
>>108578858Not true
>>108575012Not sure there is a market for this service
>>108576249happens where I work and they feed all our IP into a black box proprietary API incl. jira confluence repositories so on
>>108576551Ours is basically is a claude API with jira confluence integration & some repos/mcp servers but ofc worse in that it has to be maintained by contractors who unnecessarily added their own closed source api vendor lock-in
>>108576710Regarding 2 I've never seen project managers/upper management take criticism of AI seriously, only mid level former devs>>108577369I think the fundamental problem is that there is not much demand for something that is horribly wrong x% of the time and where the solution is to already know exactly how to do the thing. What is a solved problem via normal comp sci methods becomes an unsolved problem that creates layers upon layers of incorrectness until it enshittifies all of society
>>108574913this.I know sticking your head in the sand can feel comfortable, but you will very much regret it in a few years. this technology isnt going away, adapt or die.
>>108579651ya im adapting by not using the clothes iron on my balls lol
>>108574956I knew this underage jeet was going to post his baracat in the thread. Fucking autist.
>>108574894Well yeah, after they made Claude dumb as fuck recently.
>>108577983fuck that's so ingenious... why try to enter a market when you can create your own demand with AI. Fuck ...
>>108579800Why do you hate cats, Luddite?
>>108579800this post appears to be an automated spambot
>>108579849Im not a bot btw announcing a report is against the rules
>>108574894AIARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACTUALLY INDIANS It's like an eJeet. It all makes sense.
>>108579925AI is a redditor worrying about Izzat.
Why would I NOT use AI? Yes I love making my job harder and take longer. I ABSOLUTELY HATE finishing all my work in like 2 hours and then going out in the sunshine and nature and spend time with my children and loving wife.
>>108574894Most jobs still put the responsibility on the worker even if the ai is available. They want the worker to take the blame for what ai does and so of course somebody is going to go out of their way to insure that they are in control of the things that they are responsible for.Tech companies and anybody buying ai packages don't want their investors knowing that the extremely expensive software they just bought is faulty, because.The stockholders in companies buying ai are the same stockholders in companies selling ai, and the CEOs of companies buying ai are the ones that convinced the share holders to invest in and buy ai.All that leads to the people on the ground floor being responsible for everything ai fails to do correctly.
>>108579968If you're employed then your employer is only going to find that you can produce more and get paid less for longer hours.
>>108574894Kek what ever happened to accurate representation?
>>108580023I'm not paid hourly, I'm paid on responsibility/task basis. We're no longer peasants carding wool, Mr Marx.
>>108580030Read my statement again.
>>108574913Delusional. It's been proven repeatedly using the Lying If/Else Machine makes MORE work for employees, not LESS.
>>108580109More work, less employees, lower wages.
>>108574894Just recently my boss asked me to write a tech lead job description. I don't know what format she wants so I ask for an example posted by the company.She saif OK then, giggling and proud of herself, just sent me a Copilot generated generic tech lead job description. What.At first glance it looks right but then you see it's repeating the same thing, it's hollow, etc. so I had to redo it from scratch looking at exemples from job boards.Waste of time man. And managers think they are saving time with it.
>>108580023You are right. They will never change.
>>108580104You have my respect. Thank you for speaking the truth.
>>108574894This is pretty much the experience my dev team is waking up to as well, when our managers enforced from on high that we're classifying a subset of work to be done exclusively through AI tooling to gauge how we can deploy it at scale.Of course, management drank the koolaid and believe this is going to be a massive productivity-boost.Reality is that I already have two senior devs who are frustrated with the shit it pumps out and the inane degree of handholding it requires far surpassing that of even a straight-out-of-college junior dev. I have one guy near burn-out reviewing a pull request it cooked that had over 1000 file changes of mostly stupidity, who said "never again" in private chat - probably meaning they're ready to just leave the company (after being a steady hand for over a decade) and personally I've caught it being confidently wrong in root-cause analysis on bugs for a full 5 out of 5 cases, consecutively. Had those bugs be picked up by a junior dev without more background understanding of the codebase, they would've been sent on a wild goose chase.The best part though, was one of the senior devs flipping out in daily progress meetings when management asked why their work was taking so long. Literally flatly telling them: "well, you required us to do it with AI. If I'd been allowed to just do it myself, I'd have finished in half the time we're currently at, because I know where to make the required code changes and how to make them; but good luck getting the AI to understand that and not fuck everything up along the way." (The best-of-best part was that it was a videocall and the scrum-master chairing the meeting in the absence of the team lead who was on holiday for a week literally did a spit take with his coffee on camera.)
>>108574894AI is fundamentally brown-coded
>>108580109source: my ass
>>108575081don't forget the corporate sector mail clerksclosed down a whole avenue to advancement, you can't get a job in the mail room and learn how the company works anymore
>>108575251That's the future AI is promising. If nobody has to work we're all free to sunbathe and masturbate while watching videos of beautiful people sunbathing and masturbating.
>>108582031when in history have the ruling class allowed the working class to sit around and do nothing comfortably? you'll work for scraps or starve.
>>108574894Most white collar workers don't have much use for it.Self learners, yes.The "show me how you did that" crowd? No, they don't even use fucking google when they have a question.
>>108574894Step 1) Put bets in against your own company.Step 2) Plant a story blaming the workers for why the models don't work for every task.Step 3) Lay off workers anyway, tell them "you have to do more with less" or whatever.Step 4) Company predictably falters.Step 5) Cash out your betsStep 6) Leave and start the process again at another company.
>>108574913Nah modern AI is just a scam
>>108583303Cope. You will be replaced
>>108583435concerning
>>108583252>Self learners, yes.I've heard this several times already. How do you, as a self-learner of a topic you know little about, verify that the AI's output is correct?
>>108583435You wont do shit, codetrans
>>108583451By stacking LLMs, of course. What could possibly go wrong
>retards don't know how to use tool>blame tool
>>108583451does the output do what I need it to do? then it's correct.
>>108583488sounds transphobic
>>108574894I've been adopting AI, but it certainly makes a lot of mistakes and hallucinates false information. The time I spend crafting prompts, getting the output, checking over the output, and correcting the output it ends up taking the same amount of time for a task. I'm also developing brainrot because I don't want to do any work anymore, I just want AI to do it for me.About the only thing it's good for is mundane tasks that don't require any critical thought or accuracy.
>>108575485I see you have never talked to my manager
>>108583641your manager is using AI to write emails just like mine, no surprise there
it's like self driving cars where people only focus on the negatives in a vacuum and not the fact that it's still safer and more accurate than the average human doing those tasks. for some mass hysteria reason the general public expects absolute perfection whenever a machine is involved.
>>108574983Replacing 100% of workers is retarded. AI being "smart" and the tokens become extremely so cheap now one wagie can replace twenty? That's possible.
AI uses flattery and the dunning-kreuger effect to trick normals into thinking they're smart. Good luck flying off on vacation when AI hallucinates all your flight control software because jeets were too expensive and competent
>>108574993>every human behaviour can be predicted and forecasted for profit and exploitation.By an AI which is aligned to not understand per capita, good luck.They could use Chud AI, but chud will put them first against the wall.
>>108583758only because the system prompt tells it to. holy shit you guys have never actually used AI beyond visiting chatgpt.com and typing in a message and it shows with every ignorant word you type.
>>108583451You try it and find out. Ideally you will double-check reference material and align it with the AI. Academic books can be a dense and difficult slog to the uninitiated, AI can answer specific questions and rephrase things and generally help orient you on the topic.I can't imagine how much more effective I'd have been doing CS algorithms in C and constantly hitting implementation difficulties (pointer syntax and segfaults and shit). I could have pasted my code to an LLM and it would have explained exactly what I was fucking up. Granted it would have taken discipline to not just copy the LLM's answe and that's the obvious problem. But properly used it would have greatly enhanced my college learning.
>>108583950>You try it and find out.That works for skills where you can easily tell that something's wrong. If you ask it for help with building a shelf and you set your house on fire instead, it's pretty clear.But if, say, you ask it to rephrase a proof of complexity of some algorithm and it rewords it incorrectly, then how do you know? You can check the literature, but then you're back to dealing with the dense academic slog.
