[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1774418807369765.gif (1.71 MB, 550x338)
1.71 MB
1.71 MB GIF
I want to play around with RISC-V (like compiling my stuff for it and making my linux stuff work on it), which computer is the best?
I kind of like the SiFive HiFive Unmatched Rev B, expensive but not too expensive to be out of my reach.
Anyone is into this stuff here?
>>
StarFive VisionFive 2 has the best hardware support and has reasonably strong hardware, but it's kind of pricey. Maybe you can get one used.
>>
File: bigbrain.png (861 KB, 1080x1351)
861 KB
861 KB PNG
>>108607958
>play around with RISC-V
>>
>>108607958
After following all the RISC-V hype since around 2018, I have yet to see a single board that isn't slow. They're so slow that even Red Hat complained about build times.
At this point, if all you want is a non-arm, non-x86 machine, I would recommend finding a cheap POWER8 server on ebay. I myself bought a dual-cpu S822L for about $300, which runs circles around the fastest RISC-V machine.
>>
>>108608026
>After following all the RISC-V hype since around 2018, I have yet to see a single board that isn't slow. They're so slow that even Red Hat complained about build times.
heaving 100% open architecutre is nice, isn't it?

also, security benefits? how RISC-V., and others, stand against cpu level backdoors?

also, at silicon level (I hope in 10-20 years we will fab own cpus at local lab, in 20-40 at home)
>>
>>108607991
It's fun.
>>108608026
China and Europe are trying to decouple themselves from Burgertech, I trust that they will invest ton of money in it and make RISC-V performant in the near future.
>>
File: toilet rack.jpg (547 KB, 961x1115)
547 KB
547 KB JPG
>>108608120
>heaving 100% open architecutre is nice
Having 100% open what? ISA? You do realize this doesn't mean anything about the actual core or SoC being "open"?
>how RISC-V., and others, stand against cpu level backdoors?
What does that even mean? You have a bunch of chinese startups producing chips. ISA being open doesn't mean anything else about your piece of hardware is going to be open.
>>
>>108608026
reason being is riscv hasnt gotten a bunch of currently proprietary instructions that many modern computers have access to afaik avx2 neon whatever im not a genius but they are lacking lots of hardware acceleration its just a shit cpu that js to do everything in software surely that will change as adoption rises
>>
>>108607958
you want something using the spacemit shit.
>>
>>108607958
Wanted to say you can get orange pi rv2 for like $60 and then checked price. It's $160 now, wtf is happening.
>>
>>108608120
This one does have cpu schematics available

https://www.crowdsupply.com/baochip/dabao
and you can verify the CPU design, they elaborate on it in the article.

Other than that... there is a risc v ttl project

https://github.com/chenzhuoyu/TTL-RISC-V

by definition, completely open.

and some open cores for fpga implementation.

Unfortunately, lithography at home on micrometer scale is not feasible yet but the goys from the hackerfab are working on it.
>>
>>108607958
You could go very low and build your own TTL CPU, here a RISC-V example:
https://github.com/chenzhuoyu/TTL-RISC-V

Here is an open CPU design (which you can verify... they elaborate on how)

https://www.crowdsupply.com/baochip/dabao

and then there are a bunch of open core implementations for FPGAs

Unfortunately, going + - 1µm in precision for homelab lithography is still an ongoing research project on... the goys from the hackerfab are working on it.
>>
>>108608209
>>heaving 100% open architecutre is nice
>Having 100% open what? ISA? You do realize this doesn't mean anything about the actual core or SoC being "open"?
open ISA seems like the first step,
later openhardware/opencores VHDL/Verilog,
a TTL implementation schematics
an silicon/ASIC plan (layers for fabbing)
and one day actually fabbig it at TSMC / some other fab
>>
>>108608379
>open ISA seems like the first step
power ISA is both open and royalty free AND mature (unlike riscv)
>>
File: sickOS.png (159 KB, 339x505)
159 KB
159 KB PNG
>>108608379
"Yes please give me RV64IMAFD CPU. Please give me RV64I1p0M1p0A1p0F1p0D1p0 CPU" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
>>
>>108608863
>"Yes please give me RV64IMAFD CPU. Please give me RV64I1p0M1p0A1p0F1p0D1p0 CPU" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
Man I'm happy for you. Or so that this happened. Wut?
>>
>>108607958
I recommend Banana Pi BPI-f3 as it has Armbian support. That's what I have anyway. It ain't fast, but then again none of the RiSC-V chips are.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.