>looks nicer >less cluttered bezel>more ergonomic shape>fakes are much less common due to its obscurityWhy would anyone want an F-91w over this?
>>108614273>no calculatorpass
because I don't live in japan where they are readily available and I'm not going to bother importing a 10 dollar watch from the other side of the planet for negligible and debatable improvements
For me it's A158>>108614296>>no calculator>passAcutally you can if you change the board to Sensorwatch https://www.crowdsupply.com/oddly-specific-objects/sensor-watch-prohttps://github.com/joeycastillo/second-movement/blob/main/legacy/watch_faces/complication/rpn_calculator_face.c
for me, its 5610u
>>108615027crazy stuff nice
my thread is better than yours OP>>>/tv/219779158
>>108614273This watch shows that the owner is an autistic virgin.Why would you want this?It would be better to wear no watch and look at your phone than to use this.
>>108615037Based, literally does everything a watch should.
>>108614273Thanks, but I prefer my Casio with a side of fish.
Just passing through...
>>108615139>Mr. Noseberg, we found another one who isn't looking at his phone at all times like a good goy!>-What?! When was this??>Just now sir, I reported to you immediately.>-Quick, initiate the shaming protocol and call him a virgin! We can't let one slip through!
>>108617142Cheap knock off, American companies only know how to copy, no creativity or innovation at all
>>108615139>>108615139>This watch shows that the owner is an autistic virgin.Casio is eternal. I wear an A1000+A700 hybrid as my daily driver and women often comment on how stylish I look. Granted I wear tailor made suits and such but it doesn't subtract from it.
>>108614273Same terrible backlight. Same plastic front screen, same shitty band that disintegrate after 3 months. DW-291H is the minimum casio I would get that have all the boxes checked. >>108616190The original band is kind of shitty at least if you compare it to 5000u. But yes it is great watch. I wish they made 5510u. The 5500 series have only one watch and it is with negative display and not solar powered. What I hate about Casio is that they have probably 300 models with different 2-20 versions each but the ones worth buying are <30, they can trim the production and not produce 200 versions of dw-5600 that are some shitty colab like swatch do.
>>108614273>Poor people watch Lol lmao lmfao ROFL ROFLMFAO
Poor people should not be allowed to experience joy.
>>108617350>Poor people should not be allowed to experience joy.Exactly
i wanted a lorus but the fuckers dont sell in brazil, is either orient for analog or casio for digital.
>>108617418Give me one of your white phat assed Brazilian wymanz and I'll send you one.
>>108614273for me, its the F-14>the least clustery bezel>only shows time (data at a press of a button)>never been duplicated>cleanest look
>>108614273The second to F91w is obviously the A168. It has all the features, plus a better backlight. I have a golden-colored one like picrel, although I mostly wear a f91w >>108615037I really wanted to get one for sports but held off on buying it. Does the battery last forever if you don't keep it in the dark?
luke smith had one of these in his latest video
>>108617258Pipe down chink.
>>108614273I don't want to take a pic of my actual watch but I have this. Full steel case and bracelet and a sapphire crystal. It will last forever. You haven't lived until your Casio has a world map. The planet will shift its tectonic plates and look different before this Casio gives up.
>>108617609>Does the battery last forever if you don't keep it in the dark?If you wear it outside for 1 or 2 days a month, that's more than enough to recharge it. I've got one of the models with analog hands and I fully charged it over the course of a couple weeks of daily wear.>picrel from the GWN-Q1000 manual (the best one)
>>108617780>>108615037just disable the auto light if you are gona spend weeks in darkness or hiding it under a shirt.I noticed that the auto activated light hogs a lot of battery. It activates when you flick your wrist in a certain angle
>>108614273Women repellent
>>108614273They wouldn't. They'd want an F-105W over both of them because it actually has a good backlight.>t. AE-1200WH haver
>Nooooooo i need to less mass-produced, mass-produced digital watcherooni!!11
>>108614273I hate that collabs are 300-500$
>>108620174>AnalWhat kind of collab is that?
>>108620218ANA - All Nippon Airways
Thoughts?
>>108620229dark like my soul
5 alarmsI do wish they would beep indefinitely until acknowledged though.
i use a non-meme model casio as a pocket watch attached to my keychain (the strap is long since lost)a coworker gave it me thinking i lost it since the strap was broken and it laid at the bottom of a ladder, i said "no, i've never owned that model of watch" and he just shoved it in my hands saying something like "well if anyone comes looking for it i'll tell them you have it, it's not my problem anymore"
>>108615139Appeal to women fallacy
>>108620543It was destined for you, just like the ring to rule them all
>>108620577i unironically loathe people who get gear for fashion reasons because i have a fuckton of "gear" that has just fallen into service for me. stuff from thrift shops, stuff i've "acquired" at work, etc. even my multiool is a military-issued one, but the one i actually have is not the original one i was issued, it's one i "acquired" after losing my first one and the "acquired" one has had a longer story (and the one i lost surely was picked up by someone else and has its own story now)most stuff i own is used because most stuff i buy new doesnt survive. the used stuff comes with a story i dont know and it carries on. muh heirloom fallacy or whatever its called, the thing where old stuff looks good by grace of being the only surviving example, where even when its consoomer slop made by machine the machine that made it itself must have entered a fey mood
You are welcome!
>>108615027>https://www.crowdsupply.com/oddly-specific-objects/sensor-watch-prois there something like it for the gshock?
>>108620592>>108620543Kill this nigger on sight.
>>108614273why does it need to say WATER REIST on the face of the watch, are they worried people will forget?
>>108620639Clear indication is probably necessary by law because you have actual retards who can't bother looking things up.
>>108620639it sells
>>108620647>Clear indication is probably necessary by lawthere are many watches out there that are water resistant without proclaiming it on the watch face>>108620649so does corn syrup
>>108620639It's not about it being useful, it's about showing others that it could be.
>>108620669>hey man, is that watch water resistant?>yeah
>>108620678Wow! Such an outdoorsman! But it's not even a G-Shok... So sigma male.....
>>108620639It's water resistant, not waterproof, which means that there's an amount of water/submersion after which the watch is actually affected. On Casio watches, the "WATER RESIST" label fades as you approach that point.
>>108620705G-Shocks are for people who need to be reminded that their battery lasts 10 years every time they look at their watch>>108620709That's actually useful, I didn't know that
>>108620709I, for one, just try not to fall overboard.
>>108620715>I didn't know thatYeah that's probably because I made it up.
>>108620737That would explain it
>>108620737>>108620741i'd have believed it; my chinky ebike has special moisture-reactive stickers to tell you when the interior of the battery housing has gotten moisture in it
vibration-based time signal is very convenient
