Oh boy! I need to consoom!
>>108621413Who is this for? How many people out there want an audacity mug?
>>108621423I ordered three. One for the office, one for home, one for white elephant exchange at the local audacity fan club
Reminder that you can just install Audacity 2.4.2 and it'll work just fine.
Looks sturdy enough.I respect that.
>>108621443None for your cuckshed?
>>108623846>None for your cuckshed?
>>108621413Meh. I'll wait for the Sneedacity merch to come out.
Audacity still mogs adobe audition. Kind of sad actually>>108621474Why would you give up recursive editing?
omg do they have a funko?
>>108621413That's better than 99.9% of all other open source projects that just begs for donations. They give you an option to get something for your money that's themed by the software you're already using.
>>108625854Yeah I agree with this. Merch is providing a good to the user using it's brand identity, so it also encourages companies to keep their product good so people want to be seen with their logo on their coffee mug. The only problem I have is it will almost certainly be made of Chinesium and I only buy euromade dishware when possible.
>>108625854>>108625925Strongly disagree. I don't want random china crap with a logo thats made for the trash. I rather just give some money.
>>108621413>selling junkThe audacity!
>FOSS asks for donations>complain about how annoying it is>offers you something tangible in return>complain about how cringe it is
>>108621423Would you get a Sneedacity mug instead?
>>108624630>>108626844Fuck off
>>108626866
>>108626944Fuck off
>>108626952
>>108621423the idiots don't even sell stickers. what a missed business opportunity.
>>108626972Fuck off
>>108626866>>108626952>>108626988>getting this mad at basically nothing
>>108627003Stfu, Faggot.
>>108627003I think he just wants a better logo.
>>108627023Fuck off
>>108621413they don;t have anything worth consuming,You can fit more books, mp3s, pdfs, wikis, porn and mp4s on 5TB than most anons will ever get though in a lifetime (assuming a physical media library in addition which any tech anon or kino lover or viyda lover will have by now).This shit is for mouthbreathing normies. Nerds have already moved their shit offline.The rate at which the internet is collapsing in terms of anything worth looking at at all is evident to anyone who's been using it for 20 years. YOu'll find if you try that there are about 200,000 or so books, about 20,000 albums and roughly 3000-4000 movies or TV series in terms of software about 1000 pieces. In terms of vidya about 20,000 if you are being extensive (only a few thousand worth much time). Publishing only became mass in the second half of the 19th century as papaer got cheap.That may sound strange byt xinema has only been around for 100 years, recorded music about the same and TV about 70 years. You'd be in a great year if it had 30 great movies and TV seasons (it did happen, occasionally. So even if you mas that out 30x100=3000. Same for pron, most of it is SD and most of it is shit. It's been arpound rougly 50 years and you would be pretty fucked up if you found more that 1000 movies and a few thousand shorter pieces worth a shit. Most books are books about other books, most media and vidya is bad remakes and clones. I'm being excessive with these numbers, lots of headroom. Fuck it go get everything you care about from youtube and I'd be shocked if it was more than 1000 MP4s. Same with art. Same eith key academic texts and fiction.TLDR: Media, literature, vidya and software output of civilisation is suprisingly small. Its eveidence we are in a simulation/God created place/Call it what you like. Loss of ancient libraries/music/art/etc was memory being deallocated.
>>108625925>Merch
>>108621413did Audacity backtrack on the logo change?i'm very pleased if they did.
>>108626866Kek. Get fucked.
>>108627520Fuck off
>>108626019But anon, that's still an option.
>>108626844>>108626944>>108626972>>108627023>UPDATE THE READMEEEEEE
>>108621474https://www.ocenaudio.com/whatis
>>108629555Yeh Ocenaudio is also decentalso nice trips>>108627312>SUFFAH MUSE GROUP
Will they go through with using the terrible new logo for no good reason?Or will they keep the old one that has become iconic and is recognized by everybody doing audio editing, and even many people that never used the program?
Why do obsessed, utterly irrelevant schizos always fixate on superficial bullshit like logo design or donation popups? Could it be that they don't actually use the software they stir flamewars with undertones of americattle identity politics adjacent subtext, like lundkike? No, that'd be so low iq, too unemployed, cannot be.
>>108631261ask a french person to give up the fleur de lis
>>108631261nobody likes shitty logos anon
>>108631281didn't they do that twice already?
>>108631261you're right, why the HELL would they replace an iconic logo? the company is ran by schizos.
