I asked it about the "Nimitz House" under a bridge, and it correctly assumed "Nimitz" was a reference to the admiral, but it completely fucked up the rest
>>108634779I tried being more specific (without explicitly correcting it or giving it additional information), and it gave me this pic related
Yes probably nerfing it since Claude did it too
>>108634779>who is a famous figure in chess history (actually, a trick reference, since he was a naval admiral, not literally living in a house under a bridge).He wasn't a famous figure in chess history, and he did literally live in a house under a bridge.It hallucinated some chess riddle, and then in>>108634792and entire bridge in Fredericksburg, TX (his birthplace)Pic related is the house in on Yerba Buena Island, in SF.
>>108634779>>108634792>Honestly, this riddle is more of a pun than a strict logic problem, and it’s one that historically shows up in naval-themed chess puzzles where squares are named after admirals.>>naval-themed chess puzzles where squares are named after admirals.This is practically Terry Davis levels of schizophrenia.
>>108634811>Pic related is the house in on Yerba Buena Island, in SF.It's underneath the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, if that isn't evident.
>>108634779>Is ChatGPT getting dumber?Yes, they secretly restrict the token budget when they start running low on inference compute. This happened a lot with Anthropic about a year ago. The models are better in most ways, they just get fewer resources to answer questions, since the industry is back in another big crunch right now.
>>108634779Fake. AI is better than ever. You sound Luddite tho
It's always been pretty dumb for me.
>>108634924The funny thing is, I'm actually quite bullish on AI, even though I generally avoid using it.Playing around with GPT in 2023 and seeing that it could generate code that was syntactically correct, and often functionally correct, even in obscure languages was enough for me to realize it was over, or at least would be unless the tech hit a wall in the next year or so (which didn't happen).
If I go onto YouTube to look at all the ai and I spend a lot of time watching what it's offering as it's finished products these days it will never get any better. I wonder if the ai algorithms can be trained?>If there was an extension that could block every AI recommendation each time I refresh the page, how long before there is real AI (actually intelligent) content that comes up instead ?
>>108634924Well I will say you did make some new images, so good on you for that. Also, I guess programmers are just known as snailcat now
>>108635063you have to use>before:on youtube to filter out the slop.it's funny how there's never been more "content" on youtube, yet it's never felt more "empty," because the search feature just opens the floodgates to a deluge of slop (especially Indian slop).
