Is it just my impression or AI companies literally don't know how much (they can/should) charge for their AI model?
ai bubble was already popped.
>>108642089Because they’re all in a gold rush mentality trying to become the next Amazon
>>108642089
>>108642129just pay up goyim, the house prices cannot afford themselves.
Apportioned fixed costs + variable costs + margin
Why don't they ask their AI?
>>108642089that's meaningless until they know how much the public is willing to payif it's less than the cost to provide the service, then your business is dead, and you probably should have figured that out a bit sooner
>>108642089They can charge what they want as long as someone is willing to pay.>>108642129The free Rate limits are pretty reasonable for individuals. You can just come back later. If you need an immediate answer then you pay.>>108642196They will probably make most of their money from businesses and government contracts, etc. The idea that normal people are going to pay for an AI model is really dumb. You better be doing something revolutionary (not slop) that makes people's lives immeasurably better for that.
>>108642129Stop spamming, codetrans>>108642089Keep seething, Luddite. You don’t know what you are talking about
>>108642292Go to bed libtard, soon the ai bubble will pop.
>>108642089※
>>108642292good goyim
>>10864208918+ website
It's by design. They plan on getting everyone hooked with their free tool, then they'll start charging "tokens" by use. Oh what's that? You used your AI to help you do your technical job?? Get ready to start paying to access the work history and the help you need because you're not as technical as you thought
>>108642353kys
>>108642364Vibe coding is essentially selling drugs to children.
>>108642295Two more weeks, trans
>>108642449More like 5 minues, grandma.
>>108642269you think AI can survive off a b2b model only no charging money from normal consumers at all?
>>108642196>the public is willing to paybasically nothing. companies however, they will pay 25-50% of an employee's salary for one
>>108642089They asked AI to set the prices.
>>108642449It already popped, data centers are cancelled.
>>108642089Right now their goal is to get as many users as possible.More users means more investors.The shift happens when the investments can no longer cover the losses.Then everyone will hike their prices and only the biggest survive because they can spread the cost of training their model over more users.Once the competition is dead they will hike prices more and more to maximize profits.How far they can take this will largely depend on how many competitors are left and the discipline of the cartel those competitors will eventually form.
>>108642089They do, with the API pricing. The subscriptions are just there to fill in the demand so their GPUs are running 100% of the time, no waste.
>>108642089They don’t even know how. Per token kind of works but really it doesnt
>>108642292>Stop spammingThe pot calling the kettle black
>>108642089Right now it's not about charging but capturing the market. If you have the majority of the market and your competition is dead, you can charge w/e.
>>108642364This and flagrantly obviously this.>create dependence on llm’s in as many situations as possible when it is free>…>start charging shitloads of money and enshitify every response to be 100% advertisementI don’t have a conceptual problem with any version of “AI” available right now but the business model is disgustingly obvious.
>>108642089They hook you on with cheap price, create dependency and then hike cost. Netflix model.
>>108643787Cope, this is a lie>>108644308You are gay and shartybrown therefore subhuman
They know what they have to charge isn't realistic at all.
>>108642292did ai replace artists yet?it's been years now
>>108644816Arrest, you can't handle the truth>>108644816Cry more grafgreen, gzdoom lost and you're a subnormal
