[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Is it just me, or have all major search engines over the last few months/a year lost a lot of accuracy?
I also noticed that you get the same results regardless on whether you search with google, duckduckgo, or whatever
>>
>>108650978
there are whole grifter guru shit revolving around 'search engine optimization'
i hate those niggers so much
>>
I also noticed you posted this thread months ago
>>
>>108650988
alternatives? there has to be an old version of google available somewhere right?
>>108650989
no I didn't
>>
this shit was literally like 2 days ago in a reply limit thread but youre pretending that you've come to this conclusion spontaneously. ive seen this behavioral phenomenon constantly on this board.
>>
>>108651012
post link and I'll delete this thread
>>
>>108650998
idk, you can do before:year thing on google becuase seo shit got extremel worse with ai
>>
>>108651043
that will give me old results with the new engine, not new results with the old engine like I want
>>
>>108650978
It's been like this for literal years, Anon. How have you only just noticed? SEO's ruined search engines many moons ago.
>>
>>108651056
idk about 'old engine'
local searx or many other alternative search engines? but tb h >>108651061 desu
>>
>>108651061
I noticed retard, but it was still usable until recently
>>
>>108650978
>you get the same results regardless on whether you search with google, duckduckgo
This is not true. Google still provides more accuracy.
>>
>>108650978
people have been saying search engines have been regressing for years but i must admit i haven't noticed it. Google feels the same to me as it always did.

I once got into an argument with someone over it. He insisted modern search was absolute dog shit so i asked him to give me an example and he literally showed me this search
>"gl unwind"
and he was mad that opengl documentation weren't the first result on the page lmao
>>
>>108650978
yes. they want you to use their dogshit AI to search now. (and it's often wrong, too)
>>
>>108650978
I use Kagi because of this. When your free trial expires just sign up with a new email or alias.
>>
>>108650978
The results are less accurate but it doesn't really matter, the AI answers everything for us and it's better than the results would have been.
>>
I hate that Google search is still the most competent one even though it's been enshittified by Sukdeeps for the last ten years+. I tried giving Brave search a try and it can't ever retrieve a first-party result for a topic that Google gets on the first try.
>>
>>108654618
sometimes I want to search for a specific video or meme and AI doesn't help with that.
Sometimes I write the video's title word by word and it doesn't appear
>>
>>108650978
>enshitification
it's deliberate. this video explains in detail: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ai-fC-2Bpo
>>
>>108650978
They have been useless for at least half a decade.
>>
>>108655383
>watch a half an hour video bro
how about you go fuck yourself bro?
>>
File: 1753279137549368.png (133 KB, 1860x612)
133 KB PNG
it's AI. if normal search works well you won't try the AI shit for searching. how else can the middle managers get their AI gainz for their bonuses.
>>
it's going to be really bad when people crack how to optimize their websites for AI recommendation.
>>
It all went downhill ever since Google lobotomized reverse image search because it started getting good enough to find people on social media. I haven't used a search engine to find something I didn't already know exists for nearly a decade at this point, it just can't do what I want it to.
>>
>>108650988
It's gotten to the point where I'm forced to use Claude sometimes because the search results are just too shit. I'm grateful that StackOverflow is still running; high-quality stuff there.
>>
>>108650978
>Is it just me, or have all major search engines over the last few months/a year lost a lot of accuracy?
Can confirm. I use a lot of searching as part of my job and the implosion in quality is quite clear. Even search results on pages 2 and 3 are mostly drivel and I have to keep on searcing to find what I need.
>>
>>108650978
I noticed that putting something in quotes or using a - to exclude something doesnt actually do anything now. I literally get the exact same results. I think they do it to push us to AI because that now gives better responses.
>>
>>108650978
>over the last few months/a year
Search engines have been dogshit for at least six years now

>>108650988
This. SEO killed search engines.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.