>be me>buy ewaste>owner asks what I'm gonna put on it>randomly say BSD>"cool! send pics when you install it I'm curious to this whole BSD thing">researching>freeBSD and openBSD seem like the only decent options>idk about freeBSD's neuroticism about licensing>idk about openBSD's neuroticism about securityAny propaganda one way or another, nona?
I don't understand the question. I would eat the orange with the peel. Would I still get the $17.6 billion?
>FreeBSD or OpenBSD?macOS BSD.
>>108653929and how exactly am I gonna get that to run on an atom
if you wanna just get something up and running quick use nomadbsd. it’s an express install of freebsd you can put on a usb stick
Cuck license
>>108653846openBSD is kind of slow, but easier to understandfreeBSD is like a halfway point between openBSD and Linuxmake sure to verify hardware support in both cases.
>>108654002>errata: n/ahow humblethey do seem to have i386 releases too so I guess I might check it out. I have no problem with customizing though, and was planning on using this system.>>108654092This is the reason so much of my code is GPL'd. I hate companies so badly.
>>108653846Ghostbsd is easy apparently. I am probably gonna try it too at some point.
>>108654132slow as in heavy?
>>108654142No, slow as in slow. OpenBSD is very simple software and foregoes a lot of stuff to maintain that simplicity. It is genuinely bad at multicore workloads.
>>108654163well that should be ok, seeing as I'm on one and a half cores, right? Or does that make it even worse?Realistically my use case is probably just watching standard definition anime, listening to music, and doing visual editing in a terminal, so it's not exactly strenuous (which is why I picked this laptop up)
