[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: av1-vs-vp9.jpg (57 KB, 890x500)
57 KB JPG
which one
>>
I wish this site would finally support AV1.
>>
File: SVT-AV1-4.0.png (77 KB, 1505x490)
77 KB PNG
>>108673445
AV1 since it's a bigger jump from H.264. VP9 is the Webp of video codecs, in improvement but not a huge groundbreaking one. More importantly encoding AV1 for similar quality is not only faster compared to VP9 but x264 slow as well. Best bang/buck I guess.
>>
Avif won.
>>
>>108675462
nobody uses it
>>
>>108673445
I convert everything that comes out of my camera to AV1 in Matroska with Opus as sound.
>>
>>108673445
not jewgle that's for sure
>>
>>108673445
AV1, but why not consider Theora



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.