Which way?
>>108683547This is not an accurate representation of reality.The open source systems that people use like github are not open source. They are formatted and formatted poorly by people who are primarily closed source...
>>108683547Also... Competing AI models... Really these different models can be integrated to work together...I don't think they are really competing, more so a marketing strategy.
If anything it's a state level competition within the companies.There is multiple state actors which are looking to take a tech advantage by uncovering information relevant to AI tech.
As far as idea stealing goes, Chinese workers are always there... Distributing tech to the communist government.
>>108683547Pick the best tool for the job.
Then the AI model china supposedly leaked does not have a link.
gratis weights do not make open source. also nobody has 1tb of ram except the same megacorps you're complaining about. especially now.
>>108683547I would be fine with closed source if it's good. I was fine with Windows XP, I was even fine with 7 even though I hated it more than XP. The problem is that when closed source starts to get bad, you have no idea what is causing it, what kind of drama is happening behind the scenes, or if the whole thing isn't falling apart and you're playing the scraps of a dying empire. Most of us aren't subscribed to the freetard model of computing where absolutely everything on your computer needs to be able to be drop-shipped to every person on the internet at a moment's notice and a web of GNU and GPL licenses allow free as in freedom. Most of us just want something good and all of these shit companies have jeeted themselves and are now racing toward a cliff at breakneck speeds.In 10 years, we've gone from people being mad that Windows 10 was replacing Windows 7 to people being mad that every update to Windows 11 destroys some piece of hardware on their computer and you can't turn it off. If MacOS wasn't such a trash fire as well, people would flock t othat.
>>108683547Deepseek V4's own team evaluated it as approaching Opus 4.5, which was good, but still decent behind 4.6 and 4.7, and definitely behind GPT 5.5. Not to mention Anthropic has Mythos and, if the conjecture is correct, 5.5 isn't the real new "omnimodal" model OpenAI supposedly has, it's a distillation of it onto GPT 5.4, or it's a smaller variant of it.
>>108683660>you have no idea what is causing itSure do. That's what disassembling is for.
>>108683677translation:>we scraped gpt data to train our model and when we ask it the same questions, it spits back gpt's answer 90% of the timechinese LLMs are total trash, they only evaluate on what they trained on which is why they make up complete bullshit for anything outside the extremely narrow window of a "hello world" python app
>>108683678Even if you disassemble it and find the exact technical causes, you can't reassemble the political and business reasons a decision was made. We talk about open source drama on /g/ a bunch but it's good we can see that stuff in the light. Can you imagine the drama shitstorm that happened behind closed doors for shit like three control panels or no local accounts on install in Win 11?
american ai companies are ending up with 1tril market cap evalsopen models existing is a thread to them, but they're building the ecosystem where big companies build a reliance on their service which funnels a lot of money to the eventual winner
>>108683707Irrelevant for the process of fixing the program.
