what is the playable frame rate?
>>10869240860fps
>>108692408usually 30 but it feels bad compared to 60
for emulation, 100% of the target machineotherwise, 60 fps
>>108692417>fully playable
>>108692408I think 60 fps is fine in single player games
i like to see 90 or higher. lower is fine if i cant feel* it.*if i have the inkling to check its most likely not high enough.
>>108692408>krashde
>>108692408human eye can't see more than 24 fpsfuck off to >>>/v/
>>108692408minimum 120hzplayable 240hz
>>108692771>human eye can't see more than 24 fpsI can't tell if this statement is bait or unironically spouted by low iq poorfags lol
>>108692771It is proven, anything more is a waste of computing power
>>108692408In the early 2010s when I was a $200 acer laptop poorfag I used to play shit like Borderlands 2 at 16-20fps for hundreds of hours with friends. This was a laptop that couldn't play 720p anime without lagging no matter the video renderer I used. It overheated trying to extract a large .rar file once. Those were the best years of my life.
It depends.The absolute minimums for me areVR: 70fpsFirst person shooter with mouse: 60 fpsThird person game with gamepad: 30 fpsRacing games: 30 fpsTurn based strategy and Point&Click adventures: who cares.Double the numbers and I'll have a good experience. Well, except VR because my headset and wifi can't handle 140fps.
>>108692408Depends on how desperate and how ignorant you are. I've been playing on PC since the 90s and anything resembling 20 fps was playable for us back then because what were we going to do, we were stupid kids. When I had to play certain games on console because they're exclusive I adapted to sub 30 fps too. Now I aim for 60 as it feels like the minimum frame rate with acceptable latency, if I can get more I will lower the settings and aim for 120.
90 fps should be the minimum, 60 fps made sense when everyone was playing shitty consoles on shitty tvs.
