Boomers have been stalling IPv6 adoption for 30 years because they're too retarded to configure a firewall instead of relying on NAT.
>>108699415i think you need to lower your cfg bro
>>108699415Yes, and this will continue. I will make sure of it.
>>108699415use-case?
>>108699415computer normie here, why does it matter which ip address i use
>>108699415I can filter a dozen countries, a full bogons list, and hundreds of thousands of undesirable addresses on IPv4 with 1.5 to 3 MB's worth of CIDR entries. Doing the same for IPv6 takes at least 5-10X the resources. It is more efficient to entirely block incoming IPv6 traffic on my servers, which is exactly what I end up doing on each and every one. Anyone that needs to access the servers I manage can do so over IPv4. Everyone relegated to IPv6 can get fucked. Not worth my time.
>>108700408If you use ipv6 then the system has enough addresses to give every home appliance in the world an ip address. If you use ipv4 we can't :(Don't you want your brand new fridge to have a three year old midrange tablet embedded in the door that shows you adds and you can't turn it off? What about being able to control your toaster with this convenient phone app (we removed the physical buttons)?
>>108699415NAT is done by a firewall.
I’m just tired of getting range banned for posting child models
>>108699415IPv6 leaks mac addresses. That's why nobody in tech wants to implement it if it can be avoided
>>108700475Literally my water heater in the basement. It'll be dead in a year; meanwhile, I've taken showers in homes with gas fired waterheaters from the 1940's that need a $5 valve replaced every 30 years.
>>108700527Privacy Extensions (RFC 4941) have been a thing for nearly 20 years.
>>108699415cgNAT already exists, ipv6 is obsolete.
>>108700475Your life is recorded in immense detail by the NSA with or without IPV6
>>108700744nobody asked about surveillance fed kun the post was about IoT being gay as shit
>>108699415BASED boomersI have disabled ipv6 on every single thing I'm in contact with and I'll never stop.u mad?
>>108700475We already have that now.They can serve you ads using IPv4, they can talk to other botnet devices on your lan using IPv4, they can scan and upload hostnames, MAC addresses, or other unencrypted traffic using IPv4, so I fail to see what advantage IPv6 gives them.You can block them with a firewall on IPv4 and you can block them with a firewall on IPv6, or maybe just don't buy a fucking fridge/toaster that connects to the internet.
>>108700529>app controlled water heatergrim
>>108699415I don't have ipv6 because my provider makes weird decisions. It is possible according to others if you have it on bridge mode and buy another router.
>>108699415I explicitly refuse to serve IPv6 because it creates a digital ghetto that's discriminatory towards the third world and phone users.
IPv6 causes too much overhead to be viable for consumer products.
>>108700475>give every home appliance in the world an ip addressWhy would anyone want this?
>>108702519Don't be anti-semetic
>>108702519>>give every home appliance in the world an ip address>Why would anyone want this?Well it's kind of the point of the internet, the peers/nodes ensure network stability
>>108702959No it isn't and you're avoiding the question.
We've had 3 days of over 50% adoption now, the increasing need for IPs by phones and scraper proxies means that traffic is being forced off of IPv4 and on to IPv6. With the router ban a lot of IPv4 only devices have been banned too. With Windows XP now finally dead there is no need for IPv4 routers anymore.
>>108702519Routers wouldn't have to break OSI model to do things like NAT, making them more efficient at actually routing at the IP layer. Generally should be fine since they don't use MAC addresses to generate ipv6 autoconfigs anymore, and a firewall can still block off probes for internal devices at the IP layer (for example blocking incoming ping or SYN packets).
>>108699415What the fuck am I looking at here
>>108700408To stop ISPs from hoarding IPv4 IPs, .e.g. I just discovered that my ISP has me behind a CGNAT so I can't use port forwarding, CGNAT wouldn't exist if IPv6 was widely adopted
>>108699415I really like this picture.
>>108699415
>>108700406/thread
># CONFIG_IPV6 is not setcry about it
>>108699415ah yes let me fucking remember more numbers. shut the fuck up
i tought boomers want bridge mode ipv4 and buy new nic each time instead fake mac
>>108699415>>108706135I was so confused by picrel. I thought i was losing it.
