Should scrapers be applicable to DMCA if they scrape copyright content?
>>108707065should browsers be illegal?
>>108707181We should just make eyes illegal
>>108707065>Should scrapers be applicable to DMCA if they scrape copyright content?no. and if you're being targeted you simply move to a host where dmca notices such as this are completely ignored. scraping software isn't illegal. using it isn't illegal. but you're dealing with microsoft and they are the worst scum on this earth (along with apple, google, facebook and the pedophile elon musk). using github in the first place is low iq baboon shit for brains kind of thinking.
>provide public api that enables a behavior>someone writes software to use said api to engage is said behavior>YOU CAN'T DO THATyou can't accuse them of "circumvention" if there's nothing in place to circumvent
>>108707065reminder that Meta scraped many TBs of web data a few months ago and got away with it with zero consequences, so it is 100% legal. there was a court case for it that you can cite and everything. if fakkyu doesnt like it then they can go talk to The Zuck about it and I can guarantee you The Zuck would win.
>>108709092it is not allowed for you and you will be sued into oblivion. it is however, allowed for zuckerberg and zuckerberg will very unlikely face the wrath of FAKKU, lol
Piracy is only illegal if you don't have expensive lawyers
