So what was the point?
>>108717028They hope it gets better eventually lol
>>108717028If you pay human employees, all your money ends up subsidizing the goyim to keep reproducing and shitting up the place.
>>108717028He just means, 'we failed until now to make humanz extinct. We try better'.
>>108717028no shit, there's 8 billion people and rising every day, plus they're the ones you're selling to anyway so you can't cut them out
>>108717028>why does njudea keep hawking an obvious investor scam
>>108717028They thought racks of servers would be more nice to own than humans, but discovered that wasn't the case. Nothing beats threatening an H1B hire with deportation when they don't immediately ask "How high?" when you tell them to jump.
>>108717028That's the dude in charge of DLSS by the way. In the past he has said video games still aren't realistic enough and that NPC models should also include things like the muscular and skeleton underneath as well as working organs and blood.
>>108717028Cope. Ai is gonna replace coders
To replace the unwashed masses, that someday could revolt against their billionaire masters
>>108717231Two more weeks
>>108717175Dude, what if you could, like, literally OWN humans? Has anyone ever thought of that?
>>108717028>So what was the point?The same point we have every quarter, Pinky.Try to make stonk price go up.
>>108717303AI Gimmick Got Quik Old, No Moar WorkeeNew 'Line Go Up' Gimmick Needed
>>108717028So by the time that this stuff is cost effective why wouldn't businesses just buy their own GPU's for their own purposes rather than paying a premium just to pay down Oracle/Anthropics/OpenAI/Etc's massive amounts of debt? Somebody will surely be offering a decent non-datacentre model by then.
>>108717028I fucking hate how words from CEOs can be considered news. Nothing they have to say is authentic and genuine. Just some gay little jumble of attempting market manipulation, and preserve self reputation.Off with their heads!!! C suite fags AND (journalists) alike. Fuck off NY TIMES onions typers. You too Washington Post onions diapers.you want to make real news and do something truly useful? Write a paper on the real costs of each, compare them, be explicit and verbose AND RELEASE IT YOU FUCKING FAGGOTS
>>108717028>the cost of the car is far beyond the costs of the horses
>>108717366its what happens when you live in a jewish system>inb4 sperging over me saying the nono jew wordsorry for pointing out reality
>>108717406Cars famously never were supposed to ever drive a profit, or actually serve a use
>>108717424>Cars famously never were supposed to ever drive a profit, or actually serve a useWhat?
>>108717424>Cars famously never were supposed to ever drive a profit, or actually serve a use
>>108717414I won't sperg on you bro, I'll just continue asking to **concretely** explain how the news are involved, and you'll mumble something about how they're always suppressing people, without saying why and I'll leave it at that
>>108717028It's not about the cost.It's about showing they goyim their place.
>>108717028I hope that's the part they hid from investors so they get sued into bankruptcy.
>>108717481>explain how the news are involvedDoes your dumb ass even know who owns "the news"?! It's billionaires you dildo. Use your fucking brain.
>>108718600I meant Jews, cutie
>>108717366Wait until you learn they are speaking specifically to software which parses their words and then trades accordingly.
>>108717028if LLMs could be as capable as humans couldn't you just scale them massively once at a huge upfront cost and create a giant imaginary AI company that can coordinate perfectly and extremely fast and then have them create better models
>>108717472>revenuengmi
>>108718829No you couldn't if it's cheaper to pay actual humans to do the job instead. LLMs aren't even as capable as humans in the first place.
>>108718829Yes. Somewhat. Running that shit still has costs, power, maintenance etc. isn't free, hardware depreciates in value, and you need to also keep pushing the models themselves or your competitors just overtake you. But yes, the idea of replacing expensive employees with capex is essentially the foundation of automation. However, the big if is if they'll ever be as capable as human beings. If we today can make an llm that can do pretty much everything a white collar worker can do for 100x the price, then it's just a matter of time until the LLM gets cheaper.However, if improving LLMs would be massively helped by existing LLMs, then OpenAI would have never lost its leadership position. I'm not saying LLMs can't help, but if they're so powerful that they could trigger essentially exponential growth in model development, then there'd be no point in releasing capable new models if you could instead keep them internal and in 2 or 3 years achieve an advantage that the competition will never be able to offset.
>>108717028>So what was the point?Pump up stock price
>>108717632>get to sit instead of being on your feet all day>get to move around on a platform so you're not stuck bored in a single corner>get a protective cage so you dont end up in a liveleak video>get a cool robot claw to control>get to be surrounded by robots and enjoy the futuristic tech vibes>get to avoid human interaction and annoying bosses and cooworkersI think the wagiecage has gotten a bad wrap. Its really just because its patented by Amazon and clouded by their notoriously bad work conditions.
>>108717028It doesn't matter because the government will bail them out, force regulations that make it the only option, or give them major contracts.Of course, this would collapse the entire system because currently it doesn't do anything for a country it has destroyed.
>>108717406There is a lot of states you can still use horse.
>>108717028>So what was the point?triggering the singularity so the elites don't have to dietheir goal was never replacing human workers, that is (or will be) a side effecttheir goal has been to create a superintelligence that can engineer negligible senescence for select individuals (themselves, favored children, fertile, attractive women with likely high reproductive success, and the engineers and specialists necessary to keep everything running)though it's likely that the lower-tier people will sort of be the Numenoreans to the elites' Elves; you might get a 200 year lifespan so you can keep working, but the elites will live basically indefinitely
>>108717028it could be skunk works /x/ tier way of controlling computer so everything you possibly could imagine is readymodelled if not product
>>108717069It won't. Despite their best, efforts, AI "companies" haven't successfully managed to abstract the power grid away
>>108717028>reads ai can code as well as humans>lays off 3/4 of staff and mandates ai>money saved, quarterly bonus unlocked>ai gets expensive, forced to use api>sorry guys, ai isn't as good as humans, no more ai>"you'll hire more software devs right?">nope, costs too much>quarterly bonus unlocked>time to peek inside those CTO magazines and business magazines to see what the next trend is so more bonuses can be unlocked
>>108719713yes 1988 office style very sleek and maybe fiero starts at parking floor
>>108717028Same with "the Cloud". Companies thought they were saving money by getting rid of employees to maintain their servers but once they were locked into Azure or AWS, the costs skyrocketed, and now they're paying far more than they did for the same service on prem. Microsoft and Amazon charge far FAR more to move data out of their platforms than they do for moving data in. This is to make the expense of going back on-prem too costly and now many companies want their data back on their own servers but can't afford to do so. It's fun karma to see these companies that endlessly look for ways to fuck over employees get kicked in the nuts by someone even greedier than they are. Too bad so many people have had their lives disrupted and careers effectively ended because some MBAbro never considered that the other MBAbros might fuck him as hard as he fucked his company's employees.
>“For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees,” Bryan Catanzaro, vice president of applied deep learning at Nvidia, recently told Axios.>An MIT study from 2024 backs up Catanzaro’s experience.Leaving out "For my team" from the quote and using a study published in January of 2024. Nice article, retards.
>>108717406Main benefit of cars over horses was that cars didn’t shit on the street.
>>108719655>It won't. Despite their best, efforts,inference costs have been going way down per unit of compute, they've only risen in absolute terms because the volume (flops, intops, tokens, whatever) has been growing faster.at any given fixed level of performance you can expect rapid cost decreases.
>>108722027AI will do exactly the same by replacing pajeet coders.
>>108717069can't they ask their AIs with 10000 5080s AI EDITION NWO KILLUMINATI MAX ULTRA EDITION PLUS how much calories it costs to run a human brain vs a $CURRENT_ERA machine??
>>108719106>LLMs aren't even as capable as humans in the first place.>LLMs aren't even as capable as some humansFTFY. Sadly, AI is smarter than about 40% of the population even though it doesn't actually have the ability to think.
>>108717028Right now.AI as an industry is very speculative at this stage so invest hard, waste money, and hope it pays off.
