Decentralized git forge built on bluesky's protocol. Have you used it? is it worth moving my crack shit there?What I hate so far:- $3m Venture capital from ex-CEO of github and others- Indian developers moved to the EU- Atproto is trash so there's no private repos- Servers are named after furry dick (seriously)- Ugly as sin- Nix CICan someone who knows the bluesky shit tell me if:- they can take down nig+ license, hard truths repo and other shit?- they can take down leaked source code?- will they do a https://blog.codeberg.org/we-stay-strong-against-hate-and-hatred.html- who exactly pays for this shit? like can i start uploading my encrypted files there as a free storage?
>>108718268use case?
>>108718352uhm... atproto?oh and making sure forgejo never takes off, we wouldn't want a non-vc funded git forge now would we
>>108718268>bluesky's protocolATProto is a vibecoder's playground and clique who can't go one hour without volatile petty highschool drama. You don't want your git hosting anywhere near it.
>>108718404>says 'retard'>gets added to the chud block list>cant clone linux anymoreholy shit we need to get rid of this shit before fosstards start moving there
>>108718268>- Indian developers moved to the EU
>>108718268I'll start pushing shit GitHub DMCAed and see what happens
nix ci? based....
>>108720738On paper... I don't want to rewrite all CI workflows yet again, did that once for Gitlab. At least Forgejo has reimplemented the GitHub actions API
>>108718268>VC backedI’m good famalam
>anything /p/edoskyyikes
>>108721587Take advantage of it anon, those fuckers are wasting billions on hosting all this shit
>>108720756or you could quit being a nigger and instead use a real ci solution instead of crying over shitty git frontend vendor lock in? nah, scratch that, it's better if you continue to cry over microsoft vendor lock in. we need more comedy in the dump.
>>108722712>employer is on GitHub>writes all CIs to use the cheap actions>employer switches to Gitlab>writes all CIs to use that awful spec>employer switches to Gitea>writes all CIs to use woodpecker>employer switches to tangled>writes all CIs to use nixGitHub actions won and have the least friction
>>108722839>more sperging over vendor lock in>why yes i use microsoft :tm: service :rights reserved: insteadAs I said, stop being a retarded nigger and you wouldn't find yourself with such issues. You spamming commit history with "updated <.goy_brand_tm.xml>" isn't real work and never will be.
>>108718352Honestly this. The whole point of git is you can do whatever you want. The forge isn't that important.
>>108722916nta, but how is forgejo reverse engineering github actions bad?though personally im a docker truther, just write once and keep forever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever
>>108721587I didn't realize it was a 4chan board
>>108718268radicle.xyz already exists
>>108723073slow but i hope it succeedstangled is sucking all the air out of the github alternatives with all the vc money for marketing. Radicle is the better choice on decentralization but has no money to scale
>>1087230351x fogejo1x github1x dockerbonus context: fogejo is a meme fork of a not so meme fork of another project.bonus annoyance: the boomerism of calling everything "reverse engineered" Oh fucking gee whizz, I wonder why I'm tempted to laugh at you homos for inventing problems, getting into vendor lock in wars, and for shilling some other new shiny thing. You're acting as though you're so based for shipping a minimal platform agnostic build script, and then you shit up your sentiment by brining docker into this. No project ever had these invented issues having deployed jenkins or teamcity.
>>108723085>Oh fucking gee whizz, I wonder why I'm tempted to laugh at you homos
>social coding
>>108723186>mentions half a dozen registered trademarks>blatant fanboying>nuhuh youre the redditor >source: you sworeI hate nu-/g/
