[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.108730508
File: 433463634.png (45 KB, 197x171)
45 KB PNG
No.108730508 Archived
>yt music
>it's just yt videos
>premium doesn't even offer flac/lossless
>>
Anonymous
 No.108730623
No.108730623
>>108730508
slop sounds like slop regardless of its bitrate
>>
Anonymous
 No.108730634
No.108730634
>>108730623
I listen to super hidden and obscure Japanese lolicon-rape OSTs, it does not sound the same on .FLAC.
>>
Anonymous
 No.108732275
No.108732275
File: cover_youtube.png (1.98 MB, 1200x1067)
1.98 MB PNG
>>108730508
Who cares, you can't hear the difference anyway. Lossless is only good for archiving, and that's not what streaming services are designed for. You should store most of your music locally anyway.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.